SACRAMENTO — Law enforcement agencies in California must release police misconduct records even if the behavior occurred before a new transparency law took effect, a state court of appeals has ruled.
The ruling applies to police agencies statewide, including the attorney general’s office, unless another appellate court steps in and rules differently, said David Snyder of the First Amendment Coalition.
“These records are absolutely essential for the public to be able to see what the police departments are doing with respect to police misdoubt,” said Snyder, whose group intervened in the case. “These agencies have enormous power over Californians and so transparency of those agencies is absolutely essential in order to be able to hold them accountable.”
At least one agency reversed its prior decision to deny access to old records after the ruling came in. Sacramento County Sheriff Scott Jones said he would release records dating back five years after reading the court of appeal’s decision, the Sacramento Bee reported.
Mike Rains, an attorney for the Walnut Creek Police Officers Association and other police agencies seeking to block the disclosure, said he doesn’t see the decision as setting precedent on the merits of the case but that agencies are likely to take guidance from it unless another court rules differently.
Release of the Records Does Not Change the Legal Consequences
His clients do not have an issue with releasing records of misconduct produced after Jan. 1, Rains said, but see the release of old records as a privacy violation.
California lawmakers voted last year to require police agencies to release records on police shootings and officer misconduct to the public. Police unions had sought to block old records, with some law enforcement agencies even destroying them. Attorney General Xavier Becerra also declined to release records from his office, saying the intent of the law need to be clarified by the courts.
The appeals court ruled on March 12 but only made the opinion public Friday.
The rulings by a panel of three justices said the old records can be released because the action triggering their release — a request for public information by reporters or others — occurs after Jan. 1. The justices also noted the release of the records does not change the legal consequences for officers already found to have engaged in misconduct.
“The new law changes only the public’s right to access peace officer records,” the justices wrote.