Published
5 years agoon
By
gvwireAnyone who has seen the movie “Charlie Wilson’s War” knows that a single congressman provided great help to the Afghan Mujahideen during the Soviet war in Afghanistan. Later, these same rebels would target the United States.
“It’s worth remembering these precedents (Afghanistan, El Salvador) as the Trump administration prepares to reimpose sanctions on Iran as part of its withdrawal from the 2015 nuclear deal,” Beinart writes.
“The academic literature is clear: Far from promoting liberal democracy, sanctions tend to make the countries subject to them more authoritarian and repressive.
“The reason is that sanctions shift the balance of power in a society in the regime’s favor. As sanctions make resources harder to find, authoritarian regimes hoard them. They make the population more dependent on their largesse, and withhold resources from those who might threaten their rule.”
In arguing against stiff sanctions on Iran, Beinart also cites the example of Iraq.
“After toppling Saddam in 2003, the Bush administration discovered that governing and rebuilding Iraq was far harder than it had predicted,” Beinart says. “Ironically, that was partly because America’s own sanctions policies had made Iraq a less modern, less secular, less educated society than it had been 15 years before.”
You can read Beinart’s piece at this link.
‘No going back’: Iran Protests Now 100 Days In
An Iranian Masterwork Opens With Its Director Behind Bars
Fresno Islamic Center to Host Shab-E Yalda, Iranian Solstice Storytelling Event
Actress Jessica Chastain Says Ukraine in Focus Overlooking Iran Because it’s ‘Mostly White’
Pundits in Iran Slam China’s Support for the United Arab Emirates
Ayatollah’s Niece Urges World to “Stop Any Dealings” with Iran and Support the Protesters