Share
In political circles, the underdog usually issues the challenge to debate. But in California’s 21st congressional district the incumbent is calling out his rival.
Rep. David Valadao (R-Hanford) challenged Democrat TJ Cox to two televised debates Monday.
“I am very excited to discuss the issues that matter most to our community, from improving access to much-needed water to investing in career-technical education to delivering on our commitment to veterans,” Valadao said in a news release.
Cox Accepts
“We’re happy to debate, and we’ll reply very shortly,” Cox told GV Wire.
Valadao’s proposal calls for two debates Oct. 25. One would be a one-hour forum on KSEE-24 and KGET-17 in Bakersfield (both are NBC affiliates owned by Nexstar). The second debate would be in Spanish with “no interpreters or voice-over translators” to air for 30 minutes on Telemundo.
National poll watchers have mixed opinions on the race. FiveThirtyEight’s Nate Silver gives Cox a 64.34% probability of winning. However, Cook Political Report and Larry Sabato’s Crystal Ball say the district is likely Republican.
According to the Secretary of State, CA-21 has 45% Democratic registration and 28% Republican.
History on Valadao’s Side
Valadao led Cox in the June primary, 63%-37%.
Valadao won the House seat in 2012 with 58% of the vote. He has been reelected by similar margins — 58% in 2014 and 57% in 2016.
Brian Thompson, Not Luigi Mangione, Is the Real Working-Class Hero
4 hours ago
City, County of Fresno Reach Tax Agreement. Can Building Move Forward?
17 hours ago
Fresno Police Release Video of Gun Battle That Killed Gang Member, Injured Sergeant
19 hours ago
Supreme Court Will Take Up a Challenge Related to Tough CA Vehicle Emissions Standards
21 hours ago
Why CA Needs to Double-Down on Its Apprenticeship Programs
22 hours ago
Fresno Council Changes Rules on Presidency, Vice Presidency
22 hours ago
De’Vondre Campbell Won’t Be With 49ers After Refusing to Play: Shanahan
22 hours ago
Woman Accusing Jay-Z and Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs of Sexual Assault Acknowledges Inconsistencies