The legal dispute over Marilyn Monroe's former home pits preservationists against property owners, showcasing the clash between historical significance and development interests. (Instagram: @SaveIconicArchitecture)
- Fans and conservationists rejoice as Marilyn Monroe's former home is recommended for landmark status.
- The lawsuit highlights the clash between preserving Hollywood history and property development rights.
- Public outcry and political actions lead to the nullification of demolition permits.
Share
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
In January, fans and conservationists were celebrating as the Los Angeles Cultural Heritage Commission endorsed Marilyn Monroe’s home for landmark status, safeguarding the property from demolition.
However, the new owners of the Brentwood estate didn’t share the enthusiasm. They filed a lawsuit against the city of L.A. on Monday, seeking permission to demolish the house.
They argued that city officials had acted unconstitutionally by pursuing landmark status for a house they believed didn’t meet the criteria for historic cultural monument status, accusing them of engaging in “backdoor machinations.”
Related Story: Kendrick Lamar and Drake’s Feud: A Timeline
The lawsuit was filed by Brinah Milstein and her husband, Roy Bank, who acquired the Spanish Colonial-style home last summer for $8.35 million. Their plan to combine it with their adjacent property was thwarted by the efforts to preserve Monroe’s last residence.
Monroe’s Original Purchase
Monroe had purchased the house in 1962 for $75,000 and tragically died there six months later at age 36. The house bore the phrase “Cursum Perficio” in Latin on its front porch, signifying “The journey ends here.” However, the inscription’s origin is a mystery.
While fans and conservationists argued for the historical and cultural significance of the property, Milstein and Bank contested these claims. They highlighted the numerous alterations made to the house over the years, stating, “There is not a single piece of the house that includes any physical evidence that Ms. Monroe ever spent a day at the house.”
Related Story: Four-Time Grammy Winner Debuts Song Inspired by College Protests
The lawsuit also noted the nuisance caused by tourist attention to the property despite its obscured view from the street.
The battle intensified in September 2023 when a demolition permit was issued, prompting public outcry and a subsequent move by L.A. City Councilmember Traci Park to begin the process of declaring the house a historic cultural monument.
Milstein, during a January meeting with the Cultural Heritage Commission, suggested relocating the home instead of designating it as a landmark. However, the outcome of this proposal remains uncertain.
This legal dispute echoes recent controversies over the preservation of historic homes, such as the demolition of the Zimmerman House by Chris Pratt and Katherine Schwarzenegger, sparking debates about the balance between preservation and development in urban settings.
Read more about this story at this link.
RELATED TOPICS:
Netflix Is Airing 2 NFL Games on Christmas Day. Here’s What to Know
47 minutes ago
Hall of Famer Rickey Henderson, Baseball’s Stolen Base King, Has Died at 65
48 minutes ago
Tiger’s Son Secures Ace, Bernhard Langer Wins Playoff Over Woods at PNC
49 minutes ago
Fresno Police Arrest 11, Issue 28 Citations at DUI Checkpoint
1 hour ago
Nordstrom to Be Acquired by Nordstrom Family and a Mexican Retail Group in $6.25 Billion Deal
2 hours ago
Visalia Missing At-Risk Man Found Dead in Sequoia National Forest
2 hours ago
Stafford’s TD Pass to Higbee After Rodgers’ Turnover Leads Rams Past Jets
2 hours ago
Tulare Man Shot in Face, Police Investigating Early Morning Incident