The Foreign-Policy Parallels Between Trump and the Ayatollahs Are Uncanny
Share
[aggregation-styles]
Defense One
Defense One
It’s hard to imagine two parties more at loggerheads than President Trump and the Iranian leadership. They seem to look for every opportunity to undermine each other and attack each other. The strange thing, though, is they seem to have very similar instincts when it comes to foreign policy. That tendency makes them more combative to each other, but it also has a silver lining. Neither one is nearly as willing to go toe-to-toe as it might otherwise seem.
The parallels are uncanny. To start with the obvious, each side sees surprise as an instrument of leverage, and each actively searches for ways to be unpredictable. In this worldview, slow and deliberate policy processes are for losers—they merely cede advantage to the adversary. Both seek to seize the news cycle, and each seems determined to zig when everyone expects them to zag. Each time one side stuns the world, it is not by accident; it is by design. And it happens over and over again.
In addition, each side is deliberately disruptive. Each is dismissive of the concept of a rules-based international order, which it sees as a conspiracy to deny their country its due. They come to their skepticism from different places: Trump often views foreign countries as freeloaders, benefitting from U.S. protection while contributing little to the common good. Iranians view much of the world as co-conspirators in an U.S.-led effort to weaken, subjugate, and humiliate Iran. Still, they come out in the same place.
The parallels are uncanny. To start with the obvious, each side sees surprise as an instrument of leverage, and each actively searches for ways to be unpredictable. In this worldview, slow and deliberate policy processes are for losers—they merely cede advantage to the adversary. Both seek to seize the news cycle, and each seems determined to zig when everyone expects them to zag. Each time one side stuns the world, it is not by accident; it is by design. And it happens over and over again.
In addition, each side is deliberately disruptive. Each is dismissive of the concept of a rules-based international order, which it sees as a conspiracy to deny their country its due. They come to their skepticism from different places: Trump often views foreign countries as freeloaders, benefitting from U.S. protection while contributing little to the common good. Iranians view much of the world as co-conspirators in an U.S.-led effort to weaken, subjugate, and humiliate Iran. Still, they come out in the same place.
By Jon B. Alterman | 16 Dec 2019
RELATED TOPICS:
What’s Behind the Northern Lights That Dazzled the Sky Farther South Than Normal
Science /
16 hours ago
Are Male Voters Reluctant to Vote for a Woman? Harris’ Backers Are Confronting the Question Head On
Politics /
16 hours ago
Playful Pup Renny Leaves Street Life Behind, Awaits Adoption in Fresno
Animals /
2 days ago
Another Top City Official Quits in Los Banos as Critical Election Looms
Politics /
2 days ago
Madera County Farmland Conversion Program Begins With $10 Million in State Funds
Water /
2 days ago
Sanewashing? The Banality of Crazy? A Decade Into the Trump Era, Media Hasn’t Figured Him Out
Analysis /
2 days ago
Latest
Videos
Science /
16 hours ago
What’s Behind the Northern Lights That Dazzled the Sky Farther South Than Normal
Politics /
16 hours ago
Are Male Voters Reluctant to Vote for a Woman? Harris’ Backers Are Confronting the Question Head On
Weather /
4 days ago