Demonstrators protest outside the Center for Disease Control, in Atlanta, after the Trump administration began mass layoffs of 10,000 staffers at U.S. health agencies under the Department of Health and Human Services, including the FDA, CDC and the National Institutes of Health, in Atlanta, Georgia, U.S. April 1, 2025. REUTERS/Megan Varner/File Photo

- Trump asks Supreme Court to revive mass federal layoffs blocked by judge, part of plan to downsize U.S. government agencies.
- Judge ruled Trump exceeded authority by ordering agency layoffs without congressional approval; 9th Circuit upheld injunction against the executive order.
- Unions and local governments challenge Trump’s restructuring; Supreme Court now asked to intervene after lower courts blocked downsizing of 20 agencies.
Share
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Donald Trump’s administration asked the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday to halt a judicial order blocking mass job cuts and the restructuring of agencies, part of the Republican president’s campaign to downsize and reshape the federal government.
The Justice Department’s request came after San Francisco-based U.S. District Judge Susan Illston blocked large-scale federal layoffs, known as “reductions in force,” in a May 22 ruling siding with a group of unions, non-profit groups and local governments that challenged the administration.
The case involves the U.S. Departments of Agriculture, Commerce, Health and Human Services, State, Treasury and Veterans Affairs, among others.
Trump directed federal agencies in February to “promptly undertake preparations to initiate large-scale reductions in force” as part of his administration’s restructuring plans.
Illston wrote in her ruling that Trump had exceeded his authority in ordering the downsizing.
“As history demonstrates, the president may broadly restructure federal agencies only when authorized by Congress,” Illston wrote.
Judge Blocks 20 Agencies From Making Mass Layoffs
Illston on May 9 had initially blocked about 20 agencies from making mass layoffs for two weeks and ordered the reinstatement of workers who had lost their jobs. She continued most of that relief in her May 22 ruling.
The San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in a 2-1 ruling on May 30 denied the Trump administration’s request to halt the judge’s ruling.
The 9th Circuit said the administration had not shown that it would suffer an irreparable injury if the judge’s order remained in place and that the plaintiffs were likely to prevail in their lawsuit.
“The executive order at issue here far exceeds the president’s supervisory powers under the Constitution,” the 9th Circuit wrote, calling the administration’s actions “an unprecedented attempted restructuring of the federal government and its operations.”
Trump’s administration has sought relief from the Supreme Court in a growing number of cases following rulings by lower courts impeding various policies since he returned to office in January.
—
(Reporting by John Kruzel; Editing by Will Dunham)
RELATED TOPICS:
Trump Says Netanyahu’s Trial Should Be Canceled
8 hours ago
Trump Signals US May Ease Iran Oil Sanction Enforcement to Help Rebuild Country
9 hours ago
CIA Says Intelligence Indicates Iran’s Nuclear Program Severely Damaged
10 hours ago
Upscale Woodward Park Area Apartments Sell for $19 Million
11 hours ago
Trump Administration Orders CA to Strip Trans Athlete of Medals
12 hours ago
Three Mile Island Nuclear Plant Reboot Fast-Tracked to 2027
12 hours ago
Democratic Lawmaker Pleads Not Guilty to Assaulting US Agents at Immigration Center
12 hours ago

Israeli Settlers Raid West Bank Town, Troops Kill 3 Palestinians

West Nile Virus Detected in Mosquitoes in Fresno County

Trump Says Netanyahu’s Trial Should Be Canceled

Trump Signals US May Ease Iran Oil Sanction Enforcement to Help Rebuild Country

CIA Says Intelligence Indicates Iran’s Nuclear Program Severely Damaged
