Demonstrators protest outside the Center for Disease Control, in Atlanta, after the Trump administration began mass layoffs of 10,000 staffers at U.S. health agencies under the Department of Health and Human Services, including the FDA, CDC and the National Institutes of Health, in Atlanta, Georgia, U.S. April 1, 2025. REUTERS/Megan Varner/File Photo

- Trump asks Supreme Court to revive mass federal layoffs blocked by judge, part of plan to downsize U.S. government agencies.
- Judge ruled Trump exceeded authority by ordering agency layoffs without congressional approval; 9th Circuit upheld injunction against the executive order.
- Unions and local governments challenge Trump’s restructuring; Supreme Court now asked to intervene after lower courts blocked downsizing of 20 agencies.
Share
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Donald Trump’s administration asked the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday to halt a judicial order blocking mass job cuts and the restructuring of agencies, part of the Republican president’s campaign to downsize and reshape the federal government.
The Justice Department’s request came after San Francisco-based U.S. District Judge Susan Illston blocked large-scale federal layoffs, known as “reductions in force,” in a May 22 ruling siding with a group of unions, non-profit groups and local governments that challenged the administration.
The case involves the U.S. Departments of Agriculture, Commerce, Health and Human Services, State, Treasury and Veterans Affairs, among others.
Trump directed federal agencies in February to “promptly undertake preparations to initiate large-scale reductions in force” as part of his administration’s restructuring plans.
Illston wrote in her ruling that Trump had exceeded his authority in ordering the downsizing.
“As history demonstrates, the president may broadly restructure federal agencies only when authorized by Congress,” Illston wrote.
Judge Blocks 20 Agencies From Making Mass Layoffs
Illston on May 9 had initially blocked about 20 agencies from making mass layoffs for two weeks and ordered the reinstatement of workers who had lost their jobs. She continued most of that relief in her May 22 ruling.
The San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in a 2-1 ruling on May 30 denied the Trump administration’s request to halt the judge’s ruling.
The 9th Circuit said the administration had not shown that it would suffer an irreparable injury if the judge’s order remained in place and that the plaintiffs were likely to prevail in their lawsuit.
“The executive order at issue here far exceeds the president’s supervisory powers under the Constitution,” the 9th Circuit wrote, calling the administration’s actions “an unprecedented attempted restructuring of the federal government and its operations.”
Trump’s administration has sought relief from the Supreme Court in a growing number of cases following rulings by lower courts impeding various policies since he returned to office in January.
—
(Reporting by John Kruzel; Editing by Will Dunham)
RELATED TOPICS:
After Years of Undrinkable Water, Our Rural California Community Finally Has Hope
15 hours ago
Musk Calls Trump’s Big Beautiful Bill ‘a Disgusting Abomination’
15 hours ago
US Tariffs Could Put Air Safety at Risk, Aerospace and Airline Industries Warn
16 hours ago
Trump to Sign Order Doubling Metals Tariffs, White House Says
16 hours ago
Millions Invested in Land for Innovation Village. Will It Be a Fresno Game-Changer?
16 hours ago

Hegseth Orders the Name of Gay Rights Activist Harvey Milk Scrubbed From Navy Ship

Knicks Fire Coach Tom Thibodeau After First Eastern Conference Finals Berth in 25 Years

After Years of Undrinkable Water, Our Rural California Community Finally Has Hope
