United States Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth speaks during a media conference after a meeting of NATO defense ministers at NATO headquarters in Brussels, Thursday, Feb. 13, 2025. (AP/Virginia Mayo)

- Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth reportedly shared classified U.S. military strike details on a civilian messaging app, Signal.
- The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg was accidentally added to the chat and observed senior officials discussing war plans.
- Critics, including former Army JAG officer David French, argue Hegseth's negligence demands immediate consequences or resignation.
Share
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|

David French
The New York Times
I don’t know how Pete Hegseth can look service members in the eye. He’s just blown his credibility as a military leader.
On Monday, The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg published one of the most extraordinary stories I’ve ever read. President Donald Trump’s national security adviser, Michael Waltz, apparently inadvertently invited Goldberg to join a Signal group chat (Signal is an encrypted messaging app) that seemed to include several senior Trump officials, including Stephen Miller, Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth.
A National Security Council spokesperson told The Atlantic that the chat “appears to be authentic.”
No one apparently noticed Goldberg’s presence, and he had a front-row seat as they debated Trump’s decision to attack the Houthi rebels, an Iran-backed militia that had been firing on civilian shipping in the Red Sea.
Account ‘Pete Hegseth’ Sent Classified Information
Then, at 11:44 a.m. March 15, the account labeled “Pete Hegseth” sent a message that contained “operational details of forthcoming strikes on Yemen, including information about targets, weapons the U.S. would be deploying and attack sequencing.”
This would be a stunning breach of security. I’m a former Army JAG officer (an Army lawyer). I’ve helped investigate numerous allegations of classified information spillages, and I’ve never even heard of anything this egregious — a secretary of defense intentionally using a civilian messaging app to share sensitive war plans without even apparently noticing a journalist was in the chat.
There is not an officer alive whose career would survive a security breach like that. It would normally result in instant consequences (relief from command, for example) followed by a comprehensive investigation and, potentially, criminal charges.
Federal law makes it a crime when a person — through gross negligence — removes information “relating to the national defense” from “its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted or destroyed.”
It’s way too soon to say whether Hegseth’s incompetence is also criminal, but I raise the possibility to demonstrate the sheer magnitude of the reported mistake. A security breach that significant requires a thorough investigation.
Nothing destroys a leader’s credibility with soldiers more thoroughly than hypocrisy or double standards. When leaders break the rules that they impose on soldiers, they break the bond of trust between soldiers and commanders. The best commanders I knew did not ask a soldier to comply with a rule that didn’t also apply to them. The best commanders led by example.
What example has Hegseth set? That he’s careless, and when you’re careless in the military, people can die. If he had any honor at all, he would resign.
—
This article originally appeared in The New York Times.
c. 2025 The New York Times Company
RELATED TOPICS:
Dollar Doubts Dominate Gathering of Global Economic Leaders
1 day ago
Shedeur Sanders’ Long Wait Ends When Browns Take Him in the 5th Round of the NFL Draft
1 day ago
Only About Half of Republicans Say Trump Has Focused on the Right Priorities
1 day ago
Shedeur Sanders Is Still Waiting for a Call as the NFL Draft Enters the Final Day
1 day ago
Paul Skenes Strikes Out 9, Wins Duel With Yamamoto in Pirates’ Victory Over Dodgers
1 day ago
Eovaldi Outlasts Verlander as Rangers Beat Giants
1 day ago
Will California Meet Newsom’s 2035 EV Deadline? It Won’t Even Hit the 2026 Target
15 hours ago
Categories

Will California Meet Newsom’s 2035 EV Deadline? It Won’t Even Hit the 2026 Target

Is It Bad to Chew Gum All Day?

Dollar Doubts Dominate Gathering of Global Economic Leaders

Shedeur Sanders’ Long Wait Ends When Browns Take Him in the 5th Round of the NFL Draft

Only About Half of Republicans Say Trump Has Focused on the Right Priorities

Wired Wednesday: What’s the Future of Fresno Unified and the Superintendent Position?

Zakaria Draws Parallels Between Trump’s Tariffs, Failed 1930s Economic Policies
