Stephanie Lazarus loses her chance at parole, with family relief and testimonies highlighting the painful cold-case murder. (Shutterstock)

- Stephanie Lazarus' parole was rescinded in the cold-case murder of Sherri Rasmussen in 1986.
- The parole board heard emotional testimony from Rasmussen's family members before making their decision.
- Lazarus was linked to the murder after 23 years through DNA evidence, securing her conviction in 2012.
Share
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
LOS ANGELES — A chance for parole was rescinded Wednesday for a former Los Angeles police detective serving a sentence of 27 years to life in the cold-case killing of her ex-boyfriend’s wife in 1986.
Stephanie Lazarus was convicted in 2012 of killing Sherri Rasmussen, a 29-year-old nurse who was bludgeoned and shot to death in the condo she shared with her husband of three months, John Ruetten. She wasn’t arrested until 2009.
Parole Rescinded After Family’s Plea
The state Board of Parole Hearings heard arguments from lawyers on both sides during a hearing Wednesday that lasted about 90 minutes. The three commissioners then met privately and returned with a decision to rescind a previous grant of parole, according to attorney John Taylor, who represents the Rasmussen family.
Taylor said the family was relieved by the decision.
“Lazarus had her parole time up front, evading arrest for 23 years after the murder. She has expressed no remorse for the cold-blooded execution of Sherri Rasmussen committed while she was an LAPD officer. It’s unfair to the family that she should now go free and enjoy her life while receiving her LAPD pension,” Taylor said in a statement following the board’s decision.
Related Story: Accused Los Angeles Bus Hijacker Charged With Murder, Kidnapping
A select committee of the parole board determined last November that Lazarus was eligible for parole. The full board took up her case in May but the final decision was delayed until this week. An attorney for Lazarus couldn’t be located Wednesday.
Testimonies At The Hearing
Rasmussen’s sisters and widower gave emotional testimony during May’s hearing about their pain and described Lazarus as a conniving criminal who used her police training to cover up the killing.
At her trial 12 years ago, prosecutors focused on the romantic relationship between Lazarus and Ruetten after they graduated from college. They claimed Lazarus was consumed with jealousy when Ruetten decided to marry Rasmussen.
Related Story: Man Sentenced to Life for Tulare Murder After a Softball Game
Cold Case Cracked By DNA Evidence
The case hinged on DNA from a bite mark prosecutors say Lazarus left on Rasmussen’s arm.
Lazarus was not a suspect in 1986 because detectives then believed two robbers who had attacked another woman in the area were to blame for Rasmussen’s death.
No suspects were found and the case went cold until May 2009, when undercover officers followed Lazarus and obtained a sample of her saliva to compare with DNA left at the original crime scene, police said.
Prosecutors suggested Lazarus knew to avoid leaving other evidence, such as fingerprints.
Lazarus rose in the ranks of the Los Angeles Police Department, becoming a detective in charge of art forgeries and thefts.
RELATED TOPICS:
Fresno Police Want Your Tips to Solve Taylor Washington Homicide
2 hours ago
Derek Carr Explains Mysterious Retirement. He Didn’t Want to ‘Just Take the Saints’ Money’
4 hours ago
Were Cuts in Rooftop Solar Payments Legal? CA Supreme Court Hears Arguments
4 hours ago
Biden’s IRS Doubled Audits on the Wealthy, Data Shows
5 hours ago
Supreme Court Rules Catholic Charity Exempt From State Unemployment Taxes
6 hours ago
Israeli Military Strikes Beirut’s Southern Suburbs
35 minutes ago
Categories

Israeli Military Strikes Beirut’s Southern Suburbs

Wondrous Webster Has the Makings of a Wonderful Family Member

Trump Threatens Musk’s Government Deals as Feud Explodes Over Tax-Cut Bill

Fresno Police Want Your Tips to Solve Taylor Washington Homicide

Derek Carr Explains Mysterious Retirement. He Didn’t Want to ‘Just Take the Saints’ Money’

Were Cuts in Rooftop Solar Payments Legal? CA Supreme Court Hears Arguments
