Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
California Court: Old Police Misconduct Records Are Public
gvw_ap_news
By Associated Press
Published 6 years ago on
April 3, 2019

Share

SACRAMENTO โ€” Law enforcement agencies in California must release police misconduct records even if the behavior occurred before a new transparency law took effect, a state court of appeals has ruled.

โ€œThese records are absolutely essential for the public to be able to see what the police departments are doing with respect to police misdoubt. These agencies have enormous power over Californians and so transparency of those agencies is absolutely essential in order to be able to hold them accountable.โ€ โ€” David Snyder of the First Amendment Coalition
The 1st District Court of Appealโ€™s decision released Friday settles for now a debate over whether records created before Jan. 1, when the law took effect, were subject to disclosure. Many police unions have sued to block the records release, while public information advocates argued the records should be disclosed.
The ruling applies to police agencies statewide, including the attorney generalโ€™s office, unless another appellate court steps in and rules differently, said David Snyder of the First Amendment Coalition.
โ€œThese records are absolutely essential for the public to be able to see what the police departments are doing with respect to police misdoubt,โ€ said Snyder, whose group intervened in the case. โ€œThese agencies have enormous power over Californians and so transparency of those agencies is absolutely essential in order to be able to hold them accountable.โ€
At least one agency reversed its prior decision to deny access to old records after the ruling came in. Sacramento County Sheriff Scott Jones said he would release records dating back five years after reading the court of appealโ€™s decision, the Sacramento Bee reported.
Mike Rains, an attorney for the Walnut Creek Police Officers Association and other police agencies seeking to block the disclosure, said he doesnโ€™t see the decision as setting precedent on the merits of the case but that agencies are likely to take guidance from it unless another court rules differently.

Release of the Records Does Not Change the Legal Consequences

His clients do not have an issue with releasing records of misconduct produced after Jan. 1, Rains said, but see the release of old records as a privacy violation.

โ€œPolice officers used to have a privacy right. We donโ€™t believe it changes the rights of privacy to those records that were created prior to Jan. 1.โ€ โ€” Mike Rains, an attorney for the Walnut Creek Police Officers Association
โ€œPolice officers used to have a privacy right,โ€ he said. โ€œWe donโ€™t believe it changes the rights of privacy to those records that were created prior to Jan. 1.โ€
California lawmakers voted last year to require police agencies to release records on police shootings and officer misconduct to the public. Police unions had sought to block old records, with some law enforcement agencies even destroying them. Attorney General Xavier Becerra also declined to release records from his office, saying the intent of the law need to be clarified by the courts.
The appeals court ruled on March 12 but only made the opinion public Friday.
The rulings by a panel of three justices said the old records can be released because the action triggering their release โ€” a request for public information by reporters or others โ€” occurs after Jan. 1. The justices also noted the release of the records does not change the legal consequences for officers already found to have engaged in misconduct.
โ€œThe new law changes only the publicโ€™s right to access peace officer records,โ€ the justices wrote.

DON'T MISS

First California EV Mandates Hit Automakers This Year. Most Are Not Even Close

UP NEXT

CAโ€™s Big Pension Funds Lost Billions in Stock Market Selloff. Can They Recover in Time?

Fake Student Aid: California Colleges Detect More Fraudsters Stealing Millions

36 minutes ago

Trump Administration Freezes $1 Billion for Cornell and $790 Million for Northwestern

44 minutes ago

No Joke. Jay Leno Helps Fresno Legislator Advance Car Bill

โ€œTonight Showโ€ legend Jay Leno is teaming up with a a state legislator representing Fresno to make life easier for car enthusias...

4 minutes ago

4 minutes ago

No Joke. Jay Leno Helps Fresno Legislator Advance Car Bill

19 minutes ago

New Plan to Accelerate CA High-Speed Rail Construction Deserves Attention, Support

28 minutes ago

CAโ€™s Big Pension Funds Lost Billions in Stock Market Selloff. Can They Recover in Time?

36 minutes ago

Fake Student Aid: California Colleges Detect More Fraudsters Stealing Millions

The campus of Cornell University in Ithaca, N.Y., April 10, 2023. The Trump administration has frozen more than $1 billion in funding for Cornell and $790 million for Northwestern amid civil rights investigations into both schools, two administration officials said. (Heather Ainsworth/The New York Times)
44 minutes ago

Trump Administration Freezes $1 Billion for Cornell and $790 Million for Northwestern

The Immigration and Customs Enforcement Processing Center in Aurora, Colo., March 21, 2025. The Internal Revenue Service has agreed to help homeland security officials find immigrants they are trying to deport, according to court records, committing to sharing information in what would be a fundamental change in how the tax collector uses its tightly regulated records. (Michael Ciaglo/The New York Times)
49 minutes ago

Top IRS Officials Said to Resign After Deal to Give ICE Migrantsโ€™ Data

An attendee wears a shirt featuring images of former President Donald Trump during a rally for Trump in Waco, Texas, March 25, 2023. (Mark Peterson/The New York Times)
54 minutes ago

Why Did So Many People Delude Themselves About Trump?

55 minutes ago

Nuggets Fire Coach Malone and Wonโ€™t Extend GM Booth in Stunning Move

Help continue the work that gets you the news that matters most.

Search

Send this to a friend