Share
SAN FRANCISCO — The California Supreme Court blocked a measure Wednesday that would divide the state in three from appearing on the November ballot.
The justices ordered the secretary of state not to put the ballot initiative before voters, saying significant questions have been raised about its validity. The court now will consider a challenge from the Planning and Conservation League, an environmental group that argued splitting up California would drastically change its government structure beyond what can be accomplished through a simple ballot initiative.
The justices Wednesday ordered the secretary of state not to put the initiative before voters, saying significant questions have been raised about its validity.
“We conclude that the potential harm in permitting the measure to remain on the ballot outweighs the potential harm in delaying the proposition to a future election,” the justices wrote in a unanimous ruling.
They said time constraints forced them to rule on the issue immediately.
Draper’s Response
Venture capitalist Tim Draper, who spent more than $1.7 million on his “Cal 3” initiative, has tried for years to split the state, arguing it has become ungovernable because of its size, wealth disparities, and geographic diversity. His last attempt to divide California in six didn’t gather enough signatures to make the ballot in 2016.
“The whole point of the initiative process was to be set up as a protection from a government that was no longer representing its people. Now that protection has been corrupted,” Draper said in a statement. “Whether you agree or not with this initiative, this is not the way democracies are supposed to work.”
The environmental group’s lawsuit says major changes to the state’s government structure require approval from two-thirds of the Legislature before being considered by voters or a state constitutional convention.
Draper has argued that the measure doesn’t go beyond what voters can enact through an initiative. If passed, it would be only the first step toward splitting the state, he said.
The initiative, which could appear on a future ballot if the court ultimately rules in its favor, seeks to divide the state into Northern California, California and Southern California.
Its supporters argue the state has become ungovernable because of its size, wealth disparities, and geographic diversity.
Northern California would comprise the Bay Area, Silicon Valley, Sacramento and counties north of the state capital.
California would be a strip of land along the coast stretching from Los Angeles to Monterey.
Southern California would include Fresno and the surrounding farming communities, reaching all the way to San Diego and the Mexican border.
RELATED TOPICS:
Pre-Tariffs Stockpiling Boosts US Goods Trade Deficit to Record High
33 minutes ago
US Job Openings Fall in March; Layoffs Decline
36 minutes ago
Trump’s First 100 Days: America First President Is Overturning World Order
37 minutes ago
Fresno County Farmer Sentenced to Prison in $650,000 Crop Insurance Fraud Case
16 hours ago
Where Were the Most Car Crashes in Clovis? Police Release List
16 hours ago
Protesters to Rally in Brooklyn After Pro-Israel Crowd Assaults Woman
17 hours ago
Selma Teen’s Death May Be Tied to Fentanyl, Police Say
17 hours ago
Blast Kills at Least 26 People in Nigeria’s Northeast, Residents Say
17 hours ago
Fresno Police Arrest Teen With Stolen Gun
20 minutes ago
Categories

Fresno Police Arrest Teen With Stolen Gun

Canada’s Liberals Celebrate a Stunning Win and the Populist Challenger Loses His Seat

White House Denounces Amazon for Plan to Disclose Cost of US Tariffs

Pre-Tariffs Stockpiling Boosts US Goods Trade Deficit to Record High

US Job Openings Fall in March; Layoffs Decline

Trump’s First 100 Days: America First President Is Overturning World Order

Wired Wednesday: What’s the Future of Fresno Unified and the Superintendent Position?

Zakaria Draws Parallels Between Trump’s Tariffs, Failed 1930s Economic Policies
