Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
Judge Rules Council President's Extortion Case Will Continue
By admin
Published 2 years ago on
November 10, 2022

Share

A judge ruled that the attempted extortion case against Fresno City Council President Nelson Esparza will move forward.

Esparza, charged in July, is accused of threatening then-City Attorney Douglas Sloan’s job if he did not work for the “majority” of the council, believed to be the liberal bloc of four led by Esparza.

Attorneys for Esparza argued at the hearing that Esparza’s conversation with Sloan was protected by the attorney-client privilege. Without that as evidence, the case should be thrown out.

Fresno County Superior Court Judge Brian Alvarez said Esparza waived that privilege when he filed a defamation lawsuit against fellow city councilman Garry Bredefeld last May. In court papers, Esparza detailed his side of the conversation with Sloan. The lawsuit was dropped in June without a hearing.

Esparza downplayed the setback, speaking to reporters after the hearing.

“We remain unconcerned and undeterred about the status of the case. We’ve said from the beginning that we look forward to the process and the proceedings and moving forward. We’ll look forward to exonerating the case on the basis of the facts. Again, we continue to look forward to proving that,” Esparza said.

(Watch) Douglas Sloan Testifies in Esparza Case

He also thanked his supporters, some of whom appeared with him in the courtroom. Fresno Councilman Miguel Arias and State Center Trustee-elect Robert Fuentes were those who attended on Thursday.

“Most of the community sees the case certainly for what it is,” Esparza said.

Esparza pleaded not guilty on Oct. 27 to two counts — a felony attempted extortion charge and a misdemeanor violation of the city charter.

The case moves to the preliminary hearing stage — a hearing to review evidence — Tuesday at 10 a.m.

Fresno City Councilman Nelson Esparza (center) leaves the Fresno Superior Court, awaiting his evidentiary and preliminary hearings. (GV Wire/David Taub)

Sloan Testifies

Both sides say that Esparza and Sloan met privately on April 22, 2022, a day after a City Council meeting. The exact recollection and tenor of that conversation are disputed.

Sloan testified that he was “making the rounds” in the city council offices, and met with Esparza about a council discussion the previous day about Sloan’s job performance.

“He made what I would call a demand or a threat,” Sloan testified. He repeated the claim several times during his testimony.

“It began with him saying, I’m just going to cut to the chase. I’m standing between you and you losing your job. From now on, you go to work only for the council majority. And I responded with, ‘So what do I do if the others ask me to do something?’ And he said, Come talk to me. And then I said, Where is Luis (Councilman Luis Chavez) on this? And he said, It doesn’t matter. That was the whole conversation,” Sloan testified.

Sloan left his Fresno job shortly after the alleged incident with Esparza for the city attorney position in Santa Monica.

Prosecutor Victor Lai also called Fresno County District Attorney Senior Investigator Marshall Varela as a witness. He testified about his role in investigating the case for the prosecution, confirming he interviewed Sloan.

Former Fresno City Attorney Douglas Sloan testifies at an evidentiary hearing for Fresno City Council President Nelson Esparza. (GV Wire/Jahz Tello)

Esparza’s Defense Argues Privileged Communications

Esparza’s attorney, Scott Quinlan, cross examined Sloan, trying to pin down when communications are privileged, and when they are not. Both sides argued several legal theories.

“This is not your run-of-the-mill examination,” Alvarez said, recognizing the complexity of the case.

Alvarez said whether the Esparza-Sloan conversation was privileged “was debatable.”

“I don’t have to decide that question because I think the very clear answer to the court is that that any issue with regards to any claim of privilege has been waived by Mr. Esparza and the filing the civil lawsuit,” Alvarez said.

Judge Brian Alvarez deliberates on an objection during an evidentiary hearing for Fresno City Councilman Nelson Esparza. (GV Wire/Jahz Tello)

No Transparency from City Council

It has been 140 days since the Fresno City Council took a June 23 vote in closed session to fund Esparza’s legal defense.

Open meeting laws mandate that votes taken in closed session must be reported in open session of a government meeting. That has not happened in this case.

Once again, the City Council discussed Esparza’s case in closed session at its most recent meeting on Nov. 3 without revealing the vote from five months ago.

Councilman Luis Chavez said the council is working on that.

“These councilmember votes, I think is going to be public at some point. I think we should be public. So I’m looking forward to that conversation soon,” Chavez told GV Wire earlier this month.

He said that there is no individual councilmember that is blocking information from being released.

I don’t think anybody’s been an obstacle. I think we just want to make sure — at least I’ll speak for myself — I just want to make sure that whatever we’re doing conforms with the law and that we’re doing it not just for a specific case, but that we’re very consistent. If we have to report certain decisions, that we need to be consistent and report all of the decisions that fall under that criteria,” Chavez said.

Part of the problem is a dearth of legal advice. The City Attorney’s office is conflicted out because they are directly involved in the Esparza case. The City Council received advice from an outside attorney, Jim Sanchez — a former Fresno city attorney himself.

Jim Sanchez was retiring. They obviously notified us and we obviously have to secure another,” Chavez said.

A legal memo authored by Sanchez and Matthew Lear advised the council to reveal the June vote publicly. GV Wire sent the City Council a “cure” letter on Oct. 24, requesting the council reveal its vote. The body has 30 days to respond.

Defense Argument: Conversation Privileged

In court filings, Esparza’s legal defense team argued that the conversation with Sloan was protected under attorney-client privilege, and therefore exempt from being used as evidence. The motion cited evidence code, the city charter and the Rules of Professional Conduct for attorneys.

“At no time did Mr. Esparza authorize his counsel to disclose the contents of that communication,” the Esparza motion said.

The defense acknowledged an attorney should report a violation to a “higher authority in the organization,” but do so without revealing confidential information.

Opposing Esparza’s motion in court papers, District Attorney Lisa Smittcamp and senior deputy Victor Lai argued several reasons why there was no breach.

Esparza already waived his right to confidentiality when he filed a lawsuit against fellow councilman Garry Bredefeld in May, she wrote.

Another defense from the DA office: because Sloan did not offer advice during the conversation with Esparza, there would be no breach of confidentiality.

“If, in the interaction, there was no information transmitted, nor legal advice given, it is not covered by the privilege,” the response said.

The DA office also argued that:

  • There is an exception to the privilege rule for crimes/fraud;
  • The city, not an individual, holds the right to confidentiality;
  • The motion to dismiss was premature on technical grounds.
  • They would send a letter to the interim City Attorney asking to waive privilege.

In response, Esparza’s legal team refuted Smittcamp’s arguments. It asserts Esparza did have attorney-client privilege; and just because Esparza discussed the case in his civil lawsuit, that does not mean privilege was waived.

“The People should be required to make its prima-facie case, without reference to the alleged communication, that a crime or fraud was occurring. If they cannot establish a prima-facie case of a crime or fraud to which the conversation at issue related, then the conversation is presumed to be protected by the attorney-client privilege, and the case should not proceed,” Esparza’s attorney W. Scott Quinlan wrote.

DON'T MISS

What Are Fresno Real Estate Experts Predicting for 2025 and Beyond?

DON'T MISS

First California EV Mandates Hit Automakers This Year. Most Are Not Even Close

DON'T MISS

Fresno Woman, Tied to Fentanyl ‘M30 King,’ Sentenced to Federal Prison

DON'T MISS

Tesla Settles Wrongful Death Lawsuit Claiming Sudden Acceleration in Ohio Crash

DON'T MISS

Trump Is Dismantling the Education Dept. How That Might Harm Special Ed

DON'T MISS

Special Interests Pour More Than Half a Billion Into CA Lobbying

DON'T MISS

Texas Walmart Shooter Who Killed 23 Avoids Death Penalty by Pleading Guilty

DON'T MISS

Chevron Announces First Oil at Ballymore Project in US Gulf

DON'T MISS

Fresno Barbershop Shooting Leaves Man Dead, Two Others Injured

DON'T MISS

Vance, Modi Welcome Significant Progress on India-US Trade Deal

DON'T MISS

White House Denies Report It Is Searching for New Defense Secretary

DON'T MISS

Israeli Spy Chief Hands Court Scathing Rebuke of Netanyahu Bid to Sack Him

UP NEXT

Special Interests Pour More Than Half a Billion Into CA Lobbying

UP NEXT

Fresno Barbershop Shooting Leaves Man Dead, Two Others Injured

UP NEXT

White House Denies Report It Is Searching for New Defense Secretary

UP NEXT

Valley Crime Stoppers’ Most Wanted Person of the Day: Satbir Singh

UP NEXT

Merced College Breaks Ground on $21 Million Center Geared for Tomorrow’s Ag Jobs

UP NEXT

Fresno Police Arrest 11 for DUI During Weekend Enforcement

UP NEXT

Zakaria Draws Parallels Between Trump’s Tariffs, Failed 1930s Economic Policies

UP NEXT

Trump Stands Behind Hegseth After Attack Plans Shared in Second Signal Chat

UP NEXT

One Man Dead After Kings River Rescue Attempt in Fresno County

UP NEXT

Fresno County Will Sell Naming Rights for Clovis and Reedley Libraries

Special Interests Pour More Than Half a Billion Into CA Lobbying

1 hour ago

Texas Walmart Shooter Who Killed 23 Avoids Death Penalty by Pleading Guilty

2 hours ago

Chevron Announces First Oil at Ballymore Project in US Gulf

3 hours ago

Fresno Barbershop Shooting Leaves Man Dead, Two Others Injured

3 hours ago

Vance, Modi Welcome Significant Progress on India-US Trade Deal

3 hours ago

White House Denies Report It Is Searching for New Defense Secretary

4 hours ago

Israeli Spy Chief Hands Court Scathing Rebuke of Netanyahu Bid to Sack Him

4 hours ago

Valley Crime Stoppers’ Most Wanted Person of the Day: Satbir Singh

5 hours ago

Steeply Discounted OD-Reversal Medicine Now Available to Any Californian

5 hours ago

Merced College Breaks Ground on $21 Million Center Geared for Tomorrow’s Ag Jobs

5 hours ago

Fresno Woman, Tied to Fentanyl ‘M30 King,’ Sentenced to Federal Prison

A Fresno woman was sentenced Monday to six years and eight months in federal prison for her role in a conspiracy to traffic fentanyl, cocain...

5 minutes ago

5 minutes ago

Fresno Woman, Tied to Fentanyl ‘M30 King,’ Sentenced to Federal Prison

A Tesla logo is shown on a Model Y vehicle in Encinitas, California, U.S.,October 20, 2023. (REUTERS/Mike Blake)
24 minutes ago

Tesla Settles Wrongful Death Lawsuit Claiming Sudden Acceleration in Ohio Crash

33 minutes ago

Trump Is Dismantling the Education Dept. How That Might Harm Special Ed

California Lobbyists and Special Interests
1 hour ago

Special Interests Pour More Than Half a Billion Into CA Lobbying

El Paso Walmart mass shooter Patrick Crusius, a 21-year-old male from Allen, Texas, accused of killing 22 and injuring 25, is arraigned, in El Paso, Texas, U.S. October 10, 2019. (Mark Lambie/Pool via REUTERS/File Photo)
2 hours ago

Texas Walmart Shooter Who Killed 23 Avoids Death Penalty by Pleading Guilty

A Chevron gas station sign is seen in Austin, Texas, U.S., October 23, 2023. (REUTERS/Brian Snyder)
3 hours ago

Chevron Announces First Oil at Ballymore Project in US Gulf

Jampier Quintero, 44, was killed and two others were injured in a shooting Saturday at a Fresno barbershop, with police still searching for suspects. (Fresno PD)
3 hours ago

Fresno Barbershop Shooting Leaves Man Dead, Two Others Injured

India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi meets U.S. Vice President JD Vance at his residence in New Delhi, India, April 21, 2025. India's Press Information (Bureau/Handout via REUTERS)
3 hours ago

Vance, Modi Welcome Significant Progress on India-US Trade Deal

Help continue the work that gets you the news that matters most.

Search

Send this to a friend