Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

West Bank Town Becomes ‘Big Prison’ as Israel Fences It In

4 days ago

Trump Says He’s Willing to Let Migrant Farm Laborers Stay in US

4 days ago

US Electric Vehicle Tax Breaks Will Expire on Sept. 30

4 days ago

Eyeing Arctic Dominance, Trump Bill Earmarks $8.6 Billion for US Coast Guard Icebreakers

4 days ago

Trump’s Sweeping Tax-Cut and Spending Bill Wins Congressional Approval

4 days ago

Americans Celebrate Their Independence With Record-Breaking Travel Numbers

5 days ago

US Supreme Court to Decide Legality of Transgender School Sports Bans

5 days ago

Nvidia Set to Become the World’s Most Valuable Company in History

5 days ago

Poll: 41% in US ‘Extremely Proud’ to Be American, Near Historic Low

5 days ago
Walters: Pension Benefits Hinge on State Supreme Court Case
By admin
Published 7 years ago on
December 13, 2018

Share

California’s public employee unions suffered a potentially heavy blow this year when the U.S. Supreme Court declared that they could not charge “fair share fees” to non-members.


Opinion
by Dan Walters
CALmatters Commentary

Many unions have declared that those seeking to drop their memberships must wait until contracts with state and local governments expire and/or they must pay “service fees” if they exit.
Union leaders and their political allies – essentially the entire Democratic Party – feared that the ruling (Janus vs. AFSCME) would entice many civil service workers to drop their union memberships, sharply reducing dues income that has been a prime source of political campaign financing.
Those fears were hopes for those on the other side of the state’s political spectrum – conservative interest groups and Republicans. So far, however, the fallout has been scant.
Many unions have declared that those seeking to drop their memberships must wait until contracts with state and local governments expire and/or they must pay “service fees” if they exit. Those provisions have touched off a flurry of lawsuits contending that such footdragging violates the Supreme Court’s decision.
Meanwhile, public employee unions are awaiting another judicial decree, this one from the state Supreme Court, that also has high stakes.
Six years ago, Gov. Jerry Brown and the Legislature enacted a relatively mild reform of public employee pensions – lowering potential benefits for new workers, compelling employees to make bigger contributions and eliminating maneuvers that allowed workers to inflate their pension checks.

Reducing the Huge ‘Unfunded Liabilities’

All were aimed at slowly reducing the huge “unfunded liabilities” plaguing the California Public Employees Retirement System (CalPERS) and local pension trust funds, thanks to investment losses during the Great Recession, surging baby boomer retirements, longer lifespans and, finally, very sharp increases in benefits in the last decade.
Several unions disliked the reforms and sued, saying they violated what’s been termed the “California rule.” It’s a long-standing assumption, based on a 1955 state Supreme Court ruling, that pension benefits in place at the moment of a worker’s hiring can never be reduced without equivalent compensation.
One suit, brought by a state firefighter union, challenged the governor’s elimination of “airtime” – the ability for a worker to purchase additional years of service credit – on the assertion that it violated the California rule.
The suits resulted in a flurry of somewhat contradictory appellate court rulings, thus opening the legal door for the state Supreme Court to not only decide the specific issues, but possibly render a broader judgment on whether the California rule is sacrosanct.
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments on the merged cases this month and it was evident that its justices are somewhat uncertain over whether to issue a narrow ruling on airtime and other specifics of the governor’s reforms, or delve into the California rule.

Freezing Pension Benefits Already Earned

One appellate ruling in a Marin County case, involving the reform plan’s elimination of “pension spiking,” essentially declared that the California rule isn’t binding as long as employees receive “substantial and reasonable” pensions.

Were the Supreme Court to adopt that attitude, it would open the door to freezing pension benefits already earned by employees and adopting lower benefits for future work.
Were the Supreme Court to adopt that attitude, it would open the door to freezing pension benefits already earned by employees and adopting lower benefits for future work.
Such a ruling would please local government officials, who are faced with rapidly rising demands from CalPERS for more money to shrink the trust fund’s stubborn unfunded liability, driving some cities to the brink of insolvency and/or forcing them to ask voters for more taxes.
It would give city officials leverage to place pension benefits on the table during union contract negotiations. It would give unions a black eye for trying to overturn Brown’s reform. And it would give the governor, who took personal charge of the pension legal battle, a big bullet point in his legacy.
CALmatters is a public interest journalism venture committed to explaining how California’s state Capitol works and why it matters. For more stories by Dan Walters, go to calmatters.org/commentary

DON'T MISS

What Are Fresno Real Estate Experts Predicting for 2025 and Beyond?

DON'T MISS

First California EV Mandates Hit Automakers This Year. Most Are Not Even Close

DON'T MISS

Netanyahu Nominates Trump for Nobel Peace Prize

DON'T MISS

Netanyahu Meets Trump at White House as Israel, Hamas Discuss Ceasefire

DON'T MISS

Trump Executive Order Seeks End to Wind and Solar Energy Subsidies

DON'T MISS

US Threatens California With Legal Action Over Transgender Sports Law

DON'T MISS

US Veterans Affairs Will Cut Nearly 30,000 Jobs, Far Fewer Than Planned

DON'T MISS

Houston Astros Donate $1M to Help Recovery From Texas Floods

DON'T MISS

Tucker Carlson Aired Interview With President of Iran

DON'T MISS

California Fails to Stop 23andMe Founder From Re-Acquiring Company

DON'T MISS

Madera County Multi-Agency Effort Leads to Arrest of Felony Suspect in Atwater

DON'T MISS

Fresno Police Arrest DUI Driver During Crackdown on Illegal Street Racing and Sideshows

UP NEXT

California’s Politics Drifts Right While New York’s Leans Left

UP NEXT

How Trump’s ‘Big, Beautiful Bill’ Will Make China Great Again

UP NEXT

July 4th Quiz: Test Your Knowledge of the Founding Fathers

UP NEXT

Presidential Election Reveals Big Shift in California Voting Patterns. Will It Last?

UP NEXT

From Victims to Perpetrators: Israeli Soldiers’ Nazi Comparisons and the Unfolding War Crimes in Gaza

UP NEXT

Dear Mayor and City Council, Fresno’s Housing Bottlenecks Are a Modern Form of Redlining

UP NEXT

A Path Forward on Immigration Reform That Strengthens America

UP NEXT

Israel Faces Genocide Accusations Amid Gaza Food Aid Killings

UP NEXT

I Detest Netanyahu, but on Some Things He’s Actually Right

UP NEXT

Much of LA’s Community of Immigrants Is Hiding, Leaving a Hole in the Fabric of the City

US Threatens California With Legal Action Over Transgender Sports Law

6 hours ago

US Veterans Affairs Will Cut Nearly 30,000 Jobs, Far Fewer Than Planned

6 hours ago

Houston Astros Donate $1M to Help Recovery From Texas Floods

6 hours ago

Tucker Carlson Aired Interview With President of Iran

6 hours ago

California Fails to Stop 23andMe Founder From Re-Acquiring Company

6 hours ago

Madera County Multi-Agency Effort Leads to Arrest of Felony Suspect in Atwater

6 hours ago

Fresno Police Arrest DUI Driver During Crackdown on Illegal Street Racing and Sideshows

6 hours ago

July 4 Weekend Was No Picnic for Fresno-Area Firefighters. How Bad Did It Get?

8 hours ago

Tulare County Seizes 300 Pounds of Illegal Fireworks Over Fourth of July

8 hours ago

US Proposes Rules That Could Boost Oil, Gas Output in US West

8 hours ago

Netanyahu Nominates Trump for Nobel Peace Prize

WASHINGTON – Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Monday told President Donald Trump he had nominated him for the Nobel Peace ...

5 hours ago

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu looks on during a bilateral dinner with U.S. President Donald Trump (not pictured), at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., July 7, 2025. (Reuters/Kevin Lamarque)
5 hours ago

Netanyahu Nominates Trump for Nobel Peace Prize

U.S. President Donald Trump meets with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., July 7, 2025. (Reuters/Kevin Lamarque)
5 hours ago

Netanyahu Meets Trump at White House as Israel, Hamas Discuss Ceasefire

A wind farm is shown in Movave, California, U.S., November 8, 2019. (Reuter File)
5 hours ago

Trump Executive Order Seeks End to Wind and Solar Energy Subsidies

U.S. Secretary of Education Linda McMahon testifies before a Senate Appropriations hearing on U.S. President Donald Trump's budget request for the Department of Education, on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., U.S., June 3, 2025. (Reuters File)
6 hours ago

US Threatens California With Legal Action Over Transgender Sports Law

United States Department of Veterans Affairs logo and U.S. flag are seen in this illustration taken April 23, 2025. (Reuters File)
6 hours ago

US Veterans Affairs Will Cut Nearly 30,000 Jobs, Far Fewer Than Planned

A group of search and rescue workers paddle a boat in the Guadalupe River in the aftermath of deadly flooding in Kerr County, Texas, U.S., July 7, 2025. (Reuters/Sergio Flores)
6 hours ago

Houston Astros Donate $1M to Help Recovery From Texas Floods

6 hours ago

Tucker Carlson Aired Interview With President of Iran

Attendees visit the 23andMe booth at the RootsTech annual genealogical event in Salt Lake City, Utah, U.S., February 28, 2019. (Reuters File)
6 hours ago

California Fails to Stop 23andMe Founder From Re-Acquiring Company

Help continue the work that gets you the news that matters most.

Search

Send this to a friend