Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
What Will Supreme Court Decide on Union Dues for Public Employees?
Inside-Sources
By InsideSources.com
Published 7 years ago on
February 27, 2018

Share

Demonstrators surrounded the U.S. Supreme Court Monday during oral arguments in a case that will decide whether to outlaw mandatory union dues in the public sector.
Lead plaintiff Mark Janus argues in his legal challenge that mandatory union dues violate his constitutional rights. He argues that workers should have the right to choose whether they want to fund a union or not. Those opposed counter that unions are critical to protecting workers and upholding their rights and should be compensated for that.


News Analysis
Connor Wolf
The American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) is the specific union the lawsuit is challenging with the aim of setting a legal precedent that would impact all public-sector unions. Janus v. AFSCME Council 31 could very well become one of the most critical labor-related lawsuits in the country’s history.
Mark Janus addressed the crowd shortly after oral arguments. He was at the podium for less than a minute as hecklers shouted over him by chanting “shame” – in a likely reference to the hit fantasy series Game of Thrones. He thanked the crowd before leaving. Attorney Jacob Huebert took to the podium shortly after him when the heckling began to die down.
“We are pleased how everything went in the courtroom today,” Huebert, who is helping to represent Janus, said. “We remain very optimistic. This is the biggest case for worker rights in a generation, and we’re hopeful that the Supreme Court will restore a worker’s right to choose whether they want to give money to a political advocacy group like a union. And hopefully, the court will say clearly that when you get a government job, you don’t leave your rights at the door.”
Huebert works as the director of litigation at the Liberty Justice Center. The group has provided legal assistance in the case alongside the National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation. The groups are hoping the court overrules a decades-old decision that has upheld mandatory union payments.

The Law as It Stands Today

The U.S. Constitution bans compelled speech, like being forced to fund political activities. Labor unions currently can require dues in states without right-to-work protections so long as nonmembers have the option of paying a nonpolitical fair-share fee. The lawsuit argues that public-sector collective bargaining and political lobbying are the same, and thus all payments should be optional.

“This is the biggest case for worker rights in a generation, and we’re hopeful that the Supreme Court will restore a worker’s right to choose whether they want to give money to a political advocacy group like a union.” — Attorney Jacob Huebert
Democrats and others on the left typically believe that unions are critical to protecting workers and upholding their rights. They warn that optional dues could diminish the ability of unions to fulfill that goal because some workers might free-ride on the benefits by not funding the union. They also warn that the case is a corporate ploy to undermine those protections.
“We stand united in fighting a rigged system that rewards the super-wealthy at everyone else’s expense,” AFSCME President Lee Saunders said in a statement. “And we will not rest until we build an economy where everyone has a voice on the job, a seat at the table and a chance to succeed.”

Law’s Opponents Argue That It Forces Union Representation

Mark Janus supporters have contested the workers are being forced to accept union representation. Some workers might not even want the benefits their workplace union is fighting for – but still are legally obligated to fund those activities. Seniority policies, for example, reward workers based on how long they’ve been working as opposed to how hard.

We stand united in fighting a rigged system that rewards the super-wealthy at everyone else’s expense. And we will not rest until we build an economy where everyone has a voice on the job, a seat at the table and a chance to succeed.” —  AFSCME President Lee Saunders
The Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI) has filed legal briefs and issued coalition letters against mandatory union dues as the case has worked its way to the highest court. CEI released a report Jan. 24 arguing that unions should choose to form as member-only groups to avoid the free-rider problem.
“No worker who wants to serve the public should be forced to pay union fees against their will and at the risk of losing his or her job,” CEI labor policy expert Trey Kovacs said in a statement provided to InsideSources. “Since collective bargaining in the public sector is inherently political, it is a blatant violation of the First Amendment rights of public-sector workers. Everyone deserves the freedom to choose how they are represented at work and where their money goes.”
Labor unions that are members-only aren’t obligated to represent non-members. Labor unions generally decide not to become members-only because exclusive representation blocks other labor groups from trying to organize an established bargaining unit. But that also means they have to represent every worker in that workplace even if they don’t pay dues.

Will Supreme Court Overturn Mandatory Dues?

The U.S. Supreme Court is being asked to overturn its decision upholding mandatory fees during the 1977 case Abood v. Detroit Board of Education. The court found in that case that unions could require fees from nonmembers. It also established the nonpolitical fair-share fee.
Labor unions and their supporters have also argued that the state workers are being used in a corporate scheme to undermine worker rights. The Economic Policy Institute (EPI), a progressive research nonprofit, tackled the issue Feb. 21 in a paper that allegedly found the case is a coordinated effort financed by wealthy donors.

Justice Gorsuch Likely Is Deciding Vote

The U.S. Supreme Court heard a nearly identical case back in 2016. Rebecca Friedrichs eventually lost that case with the court split after the death of Justice Antonin Scalia. Justice Neil Gorsuch was appointed to fill the empty seat. He is likely to become the deciding vote in favor of the state workers against the union.


Associate Justice Neil Gorsuch 
Labor unions could lose a lot if the justices rule against mandatory dues. The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) reported that the union membership rate stands at 34.4 percent for public-sector workers, but only 6.5 percent for private. But the true impact is still unknown since its unclear how many workers will actually choose to leave.
The U.S. Supreme Court could make a decision anytime in the coming months. Most observers expect that a ruling is likely when the current term ends in June.
About the Author
Connor Wolf discovered his love for writing and politics at a young age while growing up in Connecticut. He eventually had the chance to pursue his passions when entering the world of journalism. Since that time he has covered labor policy, business and financial regulations. Follow him on Twitter. He wrote this for InsideSources.com.
 

DON'T MISS

What Are Fresno Real Estate Experts Predicting for 2025 and Beyond?

DON'T MISS

First California EV Mandates Hit Automakers This Year. Most Are Not Even Close

DON'T MISS

US Bond Funds Suffer Fifth Weekly Outflow on Tariff-Driven Inflation Fears

DON'T MISS

Trump Warns of Economic Slowdown Unless Fed Cuts Rates

DON'T MISS

Fresno County Will Sell Naming Rights for Clovis and Reedley Libraries

DON'T MISS

Steph Curry Scores 31 Points in the Warriors’ Victory Over the Rockets in Game 1

DON'T MISS

Pope Francis, First Latin American Pontiff, Dies on Easter Monday

DON'T MISS

Chargers in Need of Help at Wide Receiver and Tight End in the NFL Draft

DON'T MISS

Magic Happens When Kids and Adults Learn to Swim. Tragedy Can Strike if They Don’t.

DON'T MISS

Big Fresno Fair Board Will Be Led by an American Sikh for 1st Time

DON'T MISS

AI ‘Friend’ for Public School Students Falls Flat

DON'T MISS

Is a ‘Friend-Apist’ What We Really Want From Therapy?

UP NEXT

Steph Curry Scores 31 Points in the Warriors’ Victory Over the Rockets in Game 1

UP NEXT

Pope Francis, First Latin American Pontiff, Dies on Easter Monday

UP NEXT

Chargers in Need of Help at Wide Receiver and Tight End in the NFL Draft

UP NEXT

Magic Happens When Kids and Adults Learn to Swim. Tragedy Can Strike if They Don’t.

UP NEXT

AI ‘Friend’ for Public School Students Falls Flat

UP NEXT

Is a ‘Friend-Apist’ What We Really Want From Therapy?

UP NEXT

Yemen’s Houthi Rebels Report US Strikes in the Capital and a Coastal City

UP NEXT

Progressive Icon and Ex-US Rep. Barbara Lee Wins Race for Mayor of Oakland

UP NEXT

Humanoid Robots Run a Chinese Half-Marathon Alongside Human Competitors

UP NEXT

Bakersfield Push to Restore Kern River Seeks to Revitalize City

Steph Curry Scores 31 Points in the Warriors’ Victory Over the Rockets in Game 1

16 minutes ago

Pope Francis, First Latin American Pontiff, Dies on Easter Monday

2 hours ago

Chargers in Need of Help at Wide Receiver and Tight End in the NFL Draft

24 hours ago

Magic Happens When Kids and Adults Learn to Swim. Tragedy Can Strike if They Don’t.

24 hours ago

Big Fresno Fair Board Will Be Led by an American Sikh for 1st Time

24 hours ago

AI ‘Friend’ for Public School Students Falls Flat

1 day ago

Is a ‘Friend-Apist’ What We Really Want From Therapy?

1 day ago

Yemen’s Houthi Rebels Report US Strikes in the Capital and a Coastal City

2 days ago

Progressive Icon and Ex-US Rep. Barbara Lee Wins Race for Mayor of Oakland

2 days ago

Humanoid Robots Run a Chinese Half-Marathon Alongside Human Competitors

2 days ago

US Bond Funds Suffer Fifth Weekly Outflow on Tariff-Driven Inflation Fears

(Reuters) – U.S. bond funds came under heavy selling pressure in the week to April 16, highlighting concerns that U.S. President Donal...

4 minutes ago

Wall Street street sign
4 minutes ago

US Bond Funds Suffer Fifth Weekly Outflow on Tariff-Driven Inflation Fears

President Donald Trump listens to remarks during a swearing-in ceremony for Administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Mehmet Oz in the Oval Office in Washington, D.C., U.S., April 18, 2025. (REUTERS/Nathan Howard/File Photo)
10 minutes ago

Trump Warns of Economic Slowdown Unless Fed Cuts Rates

11 minutes ago

Fresno County Will Sell Naming Rights for Clovis and Reedley Libraries

Golden State Warriors' Stephen Curry (30) scores against Houston Rockets' Tari Eason (17) and Jalen Green (4) during the first half of Game 1 of an NBA basketball first-round playoff series in Houston, Sunday, April 20, 2025. (Scott Strazzante/San Francisco Chronicle via AP)
16 minutes ago

Steph Curry Scores 31 Points in the Warriors’ Victory Over the Rockets in Game 1

FILE PHOTO: Newly elected Pope Francis appears at the window of his future private apartment to bless the faithful, gathered below in St. Peter's Square, during the Sunday Angelus prayer at the Vatican March 17, 2013. REUTERS/Tony Gentile/File Photo
2 hours ago

Pope Francis, First Latin American Pontiff, Dies on Easter Monday

24 hours ago

Chargers in Need of Help at Wide Receiver and Tight End in the NFL Draft

24 hours ago

Magic Happens When Kids and Adults Learn to Swim. Tragedy Can Strike if They Don’t.

24 hours ago

Big Fresno Fair Board Will Be Led by an American Sikh for 1st Time

Help continue the work that gets you the news that matters most.

Search

Send this to a friend