Share
Courthouse News Service
OAKLAND, Calif. (CN) — A federal judge found California’s ban on “offensive” personalized license plates unconstitutional Tuesday, ruling it constitutes viewpoint discrimination under the First Amendment.
State regulations require the bureaucracy to refuse configurations that are “offensive to good taste and decency,” based on criteria that includes obscene, vulgar, or sexual language, or has “a negative connotation to a specific group.”
Lead plaintiff Paul Ogilvie, a disabled army veteran, sued the DMV in March after it rejected his request for a plate stating “OGWOOLF,” a military nickname that the DMV construed as a reference to a gang affiliation. The DMV also rejected a request for a “SLAAYR” plate, paying homage to the California rock band, because it was deemed “threatening, aggressive, or hostile.” A gay man had his request for a “QUEER” plate rejected as well.
By Maria Dinzeo | November 24, 2020
RELATED TOPICS:
Gomez Guilty of Murdering Los Hooligans Bass Player
9 hours ago
Biden Says It Was a Mistake to Say He Wanted to Put Trump in a ‘Bull’s-Eye’
9 hours ago
Tesla CEO Elon Musk Appears to Confirm Delay in Aug. 8 Robotaxi Unveil Event to Make Design Change
12 hours ago
Smittcamp Asks Court to Drop His Lawsuit Against Controversial NW Fresno Project
13 hours ago
Measure P Arts Grants Spark Debate and a Meeting Tonight
13 hours ago
Tedford Exits Fresno State Football. Tim Skipper Is the Next Bulldog Up.
13 hours ago
Trump Receives Enough Delegate Votes to Officially be Republicans’ Nominee
14 hours ago
Man Dies After Rescuing His 2 Children in Mississippi River