Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
Farmers in West Fresno County to Consider 200% Groundwater Pumping Fee Hike
SJV-Water
By SJV Water
Published 1 month ago on
August 1, 2025

A western Fresno County groundwater agency hopes to increase pumping fees by about 212% as part of a plan to avoid state intervention. (GV Wire Composite)

Share

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

A western Fresno County groundwater agency hopes to increase pumping fees by about 212%, from $8 per acre foot to $25 per acre foot, in a bid to avoid state intervention.

Monserrat Solis

Monserrat Solis

SJV Water

The Pleasant Valley Groundwater Sustainability Agency board agreed at its Tuesday, July 29, meeting to put the proposed fee hike to a vote of its growers through a Proposition 218 election, which is required before increasing land assessment or pumping fees.

A hearing is scheduled for Oct. 28 at which growers can protest the proposed increase.

If the pumping fee hike succeeds, the Pleasant Valley Water District, which also acts as the GSA, would reduce existing land assessment fees from $6 per acre to $3.25 per acre.

Pumping Fees Will Pay for New Groundwater Plan

The money from the pumping fee is needed, according to GSA board members, to pay for a revised groundwater plan. The Department of Water Resources deemed the region’s existing plan inadequate in February.

That determination kicked the GSA over to the state Water Resources Control Board, the enforcement arm of the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act. If a new plan isn’t approved by the Water Board, it could place the region into probation, which requires growers to pay extra fees and report extractions.

The new plan would cost $493,000 and take about 13 months, according to Amir Mani, a consultant with EKI Environment & Water engineering firm.

The GSA board voted 6-1 to hire EKI for the job.

Pleasant Valley Basin Groundwater Sustainability Agency Map

Board member Craig Finster, voted no, citing the cost of adding another consultant as his reason. The district doesn’t have dedicated staff, instead contracting with outside firms for engineering, administration, and legal consulting.

Cost is a concern, agreed fellow board member Travis Millwee. But farmers will have to pay one way or another.

“Those costs are going to be incurred in the future anyway through this process if we don’t go with EKI,” Millwee said.

Pleasant Valley Water District Board Seats Up for Election

Following the GSA meeting, the Pleasant Valley Water District opened its meeting and announced that all of the district’s seven board seats will be up for grabs at its next election, Nov. 4, 2025.

Most of the current board members have held their positions since 2020, some since 2019. There are five four-year terms and two two-year terms. Candidates with the highest votes are appointed to the four-year terms first, then the two-year-terms.

The filing deadline is Aug. 8. Candidate forms can be accessed on the district’s website.

The Pleasant Valley GSA is the largest of three GSAs in the Pleasant Valley subbasin, which covers about 48,000 acres west of Interstate 5 near Coalinga. The other two GSAs are  the City of Coalinga GSA and Fresno County Pleasant Valley GSA Area.

About the Author

Monserrat Solis covers Kings County water issues for SJV Water through the California Local News Fellowship initiative. 

About SJV Water 

SJV Water is an independent, nonprofit news site covering water in the San Joaquin Valley, www.sjvwater.org. Reach us at sjvwater@sjvwater.org

RELATED TOPICS:

Search

Help continue the work that gets you the news that matters most.

Send this to a friend