A coalition of states challenges President Trump's executive order aimed at accelerating energy projects, citing environmental concerns. (AP File)

- Fifteen states file a lawsuit against the Trump administration's 'energy emergency' order for fast-tracking projects.
- The lawsuit alleges the order bypasses crucial environmental laws like the Clean Water Act and Endangered Species Act.
- Attorneys general argue the order unlawfully undermines states' rights to protect their natural resources and water quality.
Share
A coalition of 15 states is suing over President Donald Trump’s efforts to fast-track energy-related projects, saying the administration is bypassing environmental protection laws and threatening endangered species, critical habitat and cultural resources.
Trump issued an executive order declaring a “national energy emergency ” on the first day of his presidency. The order urges oil and gas expansion through federal use of eminent domain and the Defense Production Act, which allows the government to use private land and resources to produce goods deemed to be a national necessity.
Executive Order Declares “National Energy Emergency”
Those kinds of steps are supposed to be reserved for actual emergencies, such as projects needed in the aftermath of disasters like hurricanes, flooding or major oil spills, the attorneys general wrote in the lawsuit filed in Washington state on Friday.
But now, Washington state Attorney General Nick Brown and the other plaintiffs said, agencies like the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Department of Interior are bypassing required reviews under federal laws like the Clean Water Act and the Endangered Species Act.
Agencies Accused of Bypassing Environmental Reviews
The attorneys general said reliable and affordable electricity is of critical importance to the nation, but noted that U.S. energy production is already at an all-time high.
“The Executive Order is unlawful, and its commands that federal agencies disregard the law and in many cases their own regulations to fast-track extensive categories of activities will result in damage to waters, wetlands, critical habitat, historic and cultural resources, endangered species, and the people and wildlife that rely on these precious resources,” they wrote in the lawsuit.
“The shortcuts inherent in rushing through emergency processes fundamentally undermine the rights of States,” the attorneys general said, noting that the federal Clean Water Act grants states the right to protect water quality within their own borders.
States Seek to Block Unlawful Permitting
They want a federal judge to declare the executive order unlawful and bar the agencies from pursuing emergency permitting for non-emergency projects.
The White House was not immediately available for comment.
Brown and California Attorney General Rob Bonta are leading the lawsuit, and the attorneys general of Arizona, Connecticut, Illinois, Massachusetts, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Wisconsin have signed on.
RELATED TOPICS:
PBS Suing Trump Administration Over Defunding, Three Days After NPR Filed Similar Case
9 hours ago
San Francisco 49ers Acquire Eagles Edge Rusher Bryce Huff, AP Source Says
9 hours ago
California Lawmaker Won’t Be Charged After Citation for Suspicion of Impaired Driving
10 hours ago
California School Awards Dinner at Disneyland Comes With Hefty Price Tag
11 hours ago
Oreo Maker Mondelez Sues Aldi, Alleging Grocery Chain Copies Its Packaging to Confuse Customers
12 hours ago
Authorities Seek Help Finding Relatives of Deceased Fresno Man
6 hours ago
Categories

Authorities Seek Help Finding Relatives of Deceased Fresno Man

Valley Crime Stoppers’ Most Wanted Person of the Day: Felecia Johnson

PBS Suing Trump Administration Over Defunding, Three Days After NPR Filed Similar Case

San Francisco 49ers Acquire Eagles Edge Rusher Bryce Huff, AP Source Says

California Lawmaker Won’t Be Charged After Citation for Suspicion of Impaired Driving
