Demonstrators rally on Cambridge Common in a protest organized by the City of Cambridge calling on Harvard leadership to resist federal government interference at the university in Cambridge, Massachusetts, U.S. April 12, 2025. (REUTERS/Nicholas Pfosi/File Photo)

- A judge set a fast-track hearing for Harvard’s lawsuit against Trump’s administration over a $2.2 billion grant freeze.
- Harvard sues to block Trump’s funding freeze, calling administration demands unconstitutional and warning of threats to vital research programs.
- Federal funding for Harvard’s research remains frozen as court battle escalates over free speech rights and accusations of antisemitism mishandling.
Share
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
BOSTON (Reuters) – A federal judge agreed on Monday to expedite Harvard University’s lawsuit seeking to block U.S. President Donald Trump’s administration from freezing $2.2 billion in federal grant funding that the Ivy League school has warned will threaten vital medical and scientific research.
U.S. District Judge Allison Burroughs during a brief hearing in Boston set a July 21 hearing for the case after Harvard warned that the freeze and additional threatened cuts were putting research at risk.
Monday’s hearing was the first she has held since Harvard sued last week after refusing to cede to what the Cambridge, Massachusetts-based university’s president said were illegal demands from an administration antisemitism task force “to control whom we hire and what we teach.”
Those demands included calls for the private university to restructure its governance, alter its hiring and admissions practices to ensure an ideological balance of viewpoints, and terminate certain academic programs.
Harvard Said It Is Committed to Combating Antisemitism
Harvard has said that while it is committed to combating antisemitism, the administration’s sweeping demands violate the free speech guarantees of the U.S. Constitution’s First Amendment.
Rather than seek a preliminary injunction blocking the freeze pending the outcome of the litigation, Harvard has opted to skip straight to the merits of the case, which both it and the U.S. Department of Justice asked the judge to quickly address.
“We would welcome oral argument as soon after as your honor is able to accommodate,” Steve Lehotsky, Harvard’s lawyer, told the judge.
Harvard and other universities have seen federal funding threatened by the administration over how they handled pro-Palestinian protests over Israel’s war in Gaza that roiled campuses last year.
The schools have also been in the administration’s crosshairs over other issues such as diversity, equity and inclusion programs and transgender policies.
The Trump administration in late March announced it was launching a review of about $9 billion in grants and contracts with Harvard over what it says is the school’s failure to protect Jewish students from antisemitic discrimination, including during campus protests.
Since then, the Trump administration has frozen $2.3 billion in funding to Harvard and threatened to strip the university of its tax-exempt status and take away its ability to enroll foreign students. It has also demanded information on the university’s foreign ties, funding, students and faculty.
—
(Reporting by Nate Raymond in Boston; Editing by David Gregorio)
RELATED TOPICS:
Newsom’s Budget Cuts Anger Allies and Leave the State’s Chronic Deficit Unresolved
5 hours ago
George Wendt, Who Played a Beloved Barfly on ‘Cheers,’ Dies at 76
8 hours ago
Fresno Supervisors Go After Catalytic Converter Thieves With New Ordinance
9 hours ago
Musk, Republican Party’s Biggest Donor, Says He Will Cut Political Spending
9 hours ago
Fresno Smoke Shops Sue City Hall, Want to Block New Rules
10 hours ago
Why California’s Biggest Local Effort to Fight Homelessness Is Starting All Over Again
10 hours ago

Fresno County Man Charged With Animal Cruelty After Hundreds of Dead Animals Found

The Personal Secretary and Adviser to Mexico City’s Mayor Are Shot Dead
