A portion of our electric and gas bills pays for energy efficiency programs. A state audit says the CPUC needs to improve its oversight. (GV Wire Composite/Paul Marshall)
- The California Public Utilities Commission needs to strengthen its oversight of energy efficiency programs, a state audit says.
- Such programs are paid for by utility customers in their monthly bills.
- The audit questions whether ratepayers have been getting the biggest bang for our bucks.
Share
|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
A recent report by the California State Auditor’s office says that the California Public Utilities Commission needs to do a better job making sure that the state’s utility companies are spending money on energy efficiency programs that are cost-effective and also do the best job of helping the state meet its energy-reduction goals.
Energy efficiency programs such as light bulb and thermostat replacements are paid for by utility customers in rates separate from their electric and natural gas usage, and total billions of dollars.
The state audit, which was requested by the Joint Legislative Audit Committee, reviewed the portfolios of energy efficiency programs for Pacific Gas & Electric, San Diego Gas & Electric, Southern California Edison, and Southern California Gas Company from 2012 through 2022 and targeted 20 efficiency programs.
The audit’s main takeaways: The portfolios did not achieve their goals and were “rarely” cost-effective, and the 20 programs reviewed did not achieve energy savings and also were not cost-effective for the most part.
Related Story: CA Bill Would Stop PG&E From Sticking Ratepayers With Ad and Lobbying
Programs not Cost Effective
Over the decade studied, state auditors found that utility company spending on efficiency programs continued to decrease. When there is less spending on energy efficiency programs, the CPUC reduces the amount that the utility companies collect from customers.
But even though the CPUC spends millions in ratepayer dollars on independent evaluations of efficiency programs, the agency does not follow up to make sure the utilities follow resulting recommendations for improving the programs’ performance, the audit found.
A key finding of the state audit is that the CPUC has allowed the utilities to operate energy efficiency programs for years that are not meeting energy-savings goals and are not cost effective according to its formula of costs and benefits.
That formula, however, does not fully capture non-energy benefits to participants, such as cleaner air or increased property values, state auditors said.
The CPUC’s response to the audit was to agree with all but one of the auditor’s recommendations and pledge to engage regularly with the utility companies to review and discuss the performance of efficiency programs and also consider how to add non-energy benefits into calculations.
Audit Report
RELATED TOPICS:
Categories
Trump Says Musk Relationship Over, Warns of ‘Serious Consequences’ if He Funds Democrats
Trump Has Options to Punish Musk Even if His Federal Contracts Continue
Ukrainian Attack Damaged 10% of Russia’s Strategic Bombers, Germany Says
Why Reforming California’s Bedrock Environmental Law Is Good for the Environment
