Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
Californians Who Illegally Divert Water Face Massive Fines Under New Legislation
gvw_calmatters
By CalMatters
Published 3 months ago on
September 4, 2024

New legislation in California aims to deter water scofflaws with hefty fines, addressing enforcement gaps exposed by recent drought violations. (CalMatters/Martin do Nascimento)

Share

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

California lawmakers last week approved a massive increase in fines for water scofflaws after ranchers intentionally defied state orders and pumped water from the drought-plagued Shasta River for eight days.

Author Profile Picture

Rachel Becker

CalMatters

Two years ago, state officials imposed the maximum fine allowed under law — $4,000, or roughly $50 per rancher, causing outrage among tribes and conservationists. The river provides vital habitat for salmon, and California was experiencing its driest three-year stretch on record.

The new legislation, which is now awaiting Gov. Gavin Newsom’s signature, would double daily fines for water rights holders who commit minor violations. Those violating curtailment orders could face fines of up to $10,000 per day — a 20-fold increase — plus $2,500 for every acre-foot of water taken. Had it been in place at the time, the Siskiyou County ranchers could have faced total fines exceeding $1.2 million.

As climate change intensifies droughts, “people are going to be, unfortunately, put in situations where they might feel that they need to take water, regardless of what the curtailment order is,” said Analise Rivero of California Trout, a conservation group and sponsor of the bill. Now, she said, “they will think twice.”

The legislation sailed through its final votes with little controversy, which is notable given that the state’s complex, gold-rush era system governing water rights often pits farmers and other water users against environmentalists.

State Standoff With Ranchers Inspired Stiffer Penalties

Assembly Bill 460 was introduced in 2023 after CalMatters reported extensively on the standoff with Siskiyou County ranchers and the penalties imposed by the State Water Resources Control Board. It cleared the Senate in a 38 to 2 vote with no debate, before heading back to the Assembly, which approved the amendments with a final vote tally of 65 to 5.

The goal is “to make sure that we’re all playing by the rules — that we don’t have a tragedy of the commons, where some are taking more and others have none,” Assemblymember Rebecca Bauer-Kahan, a Democrat from San Ramon who authored the bill, said at a June hearing.

California’s powerful farm organization did not oppose the legislation after Bauer-Kahan removed provisions that would have allowed state officials to intervene more swiftly to halt “irreparable injury” to rivers, ecosystems and other water users. Opponents said those expanded powers could ensnare law-abiding water users.

With the changes, all the opposition from growers, irrigation districts, major urban water agencies and even San Francisco Mayor London Breed fell away.

The final version is what the bill should have been all along, said Alexandra Biering, the California Farm Bureau’s senior policy advocate: a strong deterrent to taking water illegally. “We have no problem with increased penalties,” she said.

The goal is “to make sure that we’re all playing by the rules — that we don’t have a tragedy of the commons, where some are taking more and others have none.”

ASSEMBLYMEMBER REBECCA BAUER-KAHAN

California water watchers and regulators have long bemoaned the state’s limited powers to police its water rights system, which establishes priority among users of finite supply of water from rivers and streams.

Difficult to Monitor Illegal Diversions: State

State officials say a lack of resources to monitor streams for illegal diversions and unclear information about who has rights to the water complicate enforcement.

“Knowing who’s allowed to take what and how much, and trying to administer that, can be very difficult,” said Yvonne West, director of the water board’s office of enforcement. “It’s time consuming. It is usually very investigative and labor intensive, and there are some ambiguities in the law that we can spend a lot of time arguing over.”

The bill aims to address some of the enforcement gaps laid bare in the Shasta Valley two years ago. With thirsty cattle, drying stock ponds and bills from buying water and hay mounting, a rural water association serving about 80 farmers and ranchers bucked state curtailment orders meant to protect flows in the Shasta River.

“We said, ‘To hell with it,'” Jim Scala, board president of the Shasta River Water Association at the time, told CalMatters in August 2022. “We’re starting the pumps.”

Flows in the river dropped for about a week — plummeting by nearly two-thirds in a single day, which wildlife officials and Tribes feared would jeopardize salmon in the Shasta River and the bigger Klamath River that it feeds. The water board warned the ranchers to stop the diversions, then imposed the maximum fine of $500 per day for eight days, or $4,000 divided among about 80 ranchers.

For tribes and conservationists, the fine didn’t fit the crime. “We’re trying to protect the culture and the livelihood of people downstream,” Kenneth Brink, vice chairman of the Karuk Tribal Council, said at the June Senate hearing. “The salmon is a big part of our culture and our ceremonies, it’s not just a fish that swims up the river.”

Only if the violation had continued after a finalized cease and desist order — which requires a 20-day waiting period and the opportunity for a hearing — could the board have raised the fines to $10,000 a day. By then, the pumps had long been turned off.

Ranchers Oppose Restrictions on Pumping Groundwater

One of the ranchers told CalMatters at the time that, weighing the threat to his cattle and the expenses of ranching without enough water, violating the drought order “was the cheapest way I could have got by … When you’re to a point where you have no other choice, you do what you have to do.”

In California’s far north, some farmers and ranchers relying on the Shasta River and the neighboring Scott River for irrigating crops still face water curtailments under emergency measures approved in December. The rules are aimed at protecting their imperiled fish, such as salmon.

Those restrictions on water pumping are a bigger concern than the increased fines, said Siskiyou County Farm Bureau President Ryan Walker. “Whether it’s $500 or $10,000, it’s the underlying curtailment that’s grossly unfair. The penalty is simply something that goes along with it,” Walker said.

The growers and ranchers need the river’s water for irrigation of crops during a critical time in the season, he said. “It really could have made the difference between a profitable and nonprofitable year.”

The bill represents the last of a trio of bills that emerged after the most recent drought tackling California’s water priority system One clarifying the state’s authority to investigate longstanding water rights claims was approved, while another, which would have expanded the state’s powers to restrict pumping from rivers and streams, stalled.

California’s water watchers are celebrating the cooperation that smoothed the passage of Bauer-Kahan’s bill. But they say more needs to be done to bolster policing of the state’s most precious resource.

“History has shown that the board’s current tools are not sufficient,” said Jennifer Harder, a professor at the University of the Pacific’s McGeorge School of Law. “But I’m very encouraged by the water users and the environmental interests coming together and hope that they can build on that relationship in future.”

About the Author

Rachel Becker is a journalist reporting on California’s complex water challenges and water policy issues for CalMatters. She’s covered drought, water standoffs, groundwater depletion, water quality and the world’s biggest dam removal.

About CalMatters

CalMatters is a nonprofit, nonpartisan newsroom committed to explaining California policy and politics.

RELATED TOPICS:

DON'T MISS

How About an Honest Conversation About the Range of Light Monument Proposal?

DON'T MISS

UConn Coach Geno Auriemma Breaks NCAA Wins Record With 1,217th Victory

DON'T MISS

Fresno Doctors Will Pay $2.4 Million to Settle Kickback Allegations, DOJ Says

DON'T MISS

Warriors Guard De’Anthony Melton to Undergo Season-Ending Knee Surgery

DON'T MISS

Massive Ground Beef Recall Affects Restaurants Nationwide, USDA Warns

DON'T MISS

Chris Stapleton Wins 4 CMA Awards, but Morgan Wallen Is Entertainer of the Year

DON'T MISS

These Fresno Schools Are Unsafe and in Bad Condition. And No One Is Complaining

DON'T MISS

Putin Says Russia Has Tested a New Intermediate Range Missile in a Strike on Ukraine

DON'T MISS

SEC Chair Gary Gensler, Who Led US Crackdown on Cryptocurrencies, to Step Down

DON'T MISS

Is Fresno Mobile Home Park Controversy Over? Tenants Applaud Federal Judge’s Ruling

UP NEXT

Newsom Heads to Fresno, a County That Voted for Trump

UP NEXT

Conservative Professors and Students Are Beating CA Community Colleges in Court

UP NEXT

Thousands of University of California Workers Go on 2-Day Strike Over Wages, Staff Shortages

UP NEXT

Demography Drives Destiny and Right Now California Is Losing

UP NEXT

Gavin Newsom Pledged to Release His Tax Returns Every Year. The Last One Was for 2020.

UP NEXT

California Governor Will Not Make Clemency Decision for Menendez Brothers Until New DA Reviews Case

UP NEXT

Fewer Kids Are Going to California Public Schools. Is There a Right Way to Close Campuses?

UP NEXT

California Voters Reject Measure That Would Have Raised Minimum Wage to Nation-High $18 Per Hour

UP NEXT

With Democracy Supposedly at Stake, California Voters Stayed Away in Droves

UP NEXT

How Three Trump Policy Decrees Could Affect California Farmers

Warriors Guard De’Anthony Melton to Undergo Season-Ending Knee Surgery

2 hours ago

Massive Ground Beef Recall Affects Restaurants Nationwide, USDA Warns

2 hours ago

Chris Stapleton Wins 4 CMA Awards, but Morgan Wallen Is Entertainer of the Year

2 hours ago

These Fresno Schools Are Unsafe and in Bad Condition. And No One Is Complaining

2 hours ago

Putin Says Russia Has Tested a New Intermediate Range Missile in a Strike on Ukraine

2 hours ago

SEC Chair Gary Gensler, Who Led US Crackdown on Cryptocurrencies, to Step Down

2 hours ago

Is Fresno Mobile Home Park Controversy Over? Tenants Applaud Federal Judge’s Ruling

2 hours ago

Wiggins, Curry Power Warriors to Dominant Win Over Hawks

3 hours ago

Sale and Skubal Claim Cy Young Awards After Historic Pitching Triple Crown Seasons

3 hours ago

What Will Happen to CNBC and MSNBC When They No Longer Have a Corporate Connection to NBC News?

3 hours ago

How About an Honest Conversation About the Range of Light Monument Proposal?

It sometimes seems that we have lost the ability to truly communicate with one another. It is not so much what we say to one another, but ho...

48 minutes ago

48 minutes ago

How About an Honest Conversation About the Range of Light Monument Proposal?

1 hour ago

UConn Coach Geno Auriemma Breaks NCAA Wins Record With 1,217th Victory

1 hour ago

Fresno Doctors Will Pay $2.4 Million to Settle Kickback Allegations, DOJ Says

2 hours ago

Warriors Guard De’Anthony Melton to Undergo Season-Ending Knee Surgery

2 hours ago

Massive Ground Beef Recall Affects Restaurants Nationwide, USDA Warns

2 hours ago

Chris Stapleton Wins 4 CMA Awards, but Morgan Wallen Is Entertainer of the Year

2 hours ago

These Fresno Schools Are Unsafe and in Bad Condition. And No One Is Complaining

2 hours ago

Putin Says Russia Has Tested a New Intermediate Range Missile in a Strike on Ukraine

Help continue the work that gets you the news that matters most.

Search

Send this to a friend