Opinion

California Legislators Whiff on ‘Spiraling Crisis’ in Home Insurance Market

Published

2 months ago

September 25, 2023

Dan Walters, CalMatters Commentary

One by one, insurers have been reducing or eliminating home coverage in California, Dan Walters says. (Shutterstock)

Share with friends

Before the California Legislature adjourned this month, it managed to fulfill most of wishes of majority Democrats’ favorite interest groups, most notably labor unions.

Dan Walters

CalMatters

Opinion

However, legislators left town without doing anything concrete about something that threatens the psychic and economic wellbeing of millions of homeowners and those who aspire to ownership: the rapidly shrinking availability of residential fire insurance.

One by one, insurers have been reducing or eliminating their exposure in California, having paid out billions of dollars to cover losses from years of major wildfires and, they say, facing a fire threat that is likely to increase with climate change.

With Gov. Gavin Newsom and Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara involved in the background, there were weeks of private negotiations among legislators, insurance lobbyists and other stakeholders on how to bolster the state’s insurance market.

However, the negotiations ended a week before the Legislature adjourned without agreement, signaled when state Sen. Bill Dodd, a Democrat whose Napa-centered district is one of the state’s most fire-prone regions, sent a text message: “Deal is dead. Very frustrating.”

The discussions revolved about changing the way insurers calculate risk, from basing it on past experience to including potential future risk. Such a change would probably increase premiums and legislators wanted ironclad assurances that the companies would continue writing policies in fire-prone areas if the change was made.

As the session ended, there were public assurances that the issue would not be forgotten.

“We hear loud and clear from our residents that access to insurance is a problem,” Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas said in a statement.

The Legislature’s departure punted the issue, at least for a few months, to Lara and Newsom, who said, “We can do a lot of things. And I’m very mindful. We can do all of that.”

However, Newsom didn’t list any specifics. Last Thursday, he issued an executive order urging Lara to “take action to stabilize and improve California’s property insurance marketplace.”

Almost immediately, Lara issued new rate-setting regulations, which he had described earlier as “a package of regulatory solutions that will streamline the department’s rate review process, opening it equitably to public input – not just the entrenched interests that have benefited materially from the status quo.”

California Insurance Market in ‘Spiraling Crisis’

Newsom, Lara and the regulations drew praise from the American Property Casualty Insurance Association, which said, “Everyone understands that California’s insurance market is in a spiraling crisis that requires immediate policy solutions to protect consumer access to the coverage they need.”

Given industry support, it’s likely that the new regulations will allow it to include, at least to some extent, estimates of future risk from wildfires in their rates which would probably lead to premium increases.

Newsom stopped short of declaring an emergency in Thursday’s executive order, which would have given Lara the authority to issue new rate-setting rules without going through the usual procedural hoops.

Earlier in the day, Consumer Watchdog, the organization that sponsored a 1988 overhaul of insurance regulation, Proposition 103, and has been a critic of Lara from virtually his first day on the job, issued a warning to Newsom and Lara about proceeding on an emergency basis.

Later, the organization said, Lara’s move “would allow insurance companies to use secret algorithms to set rates for homeowners’ coverage for wildfire and to add reinsurance costs to premiums will lead to higher insurance premiums.”

So there it is, a complex mélange of economic, political and societal factors and a huge tradeoff between the availability of coverage, which is mandatory for anyone having a mortgage, and the costs.

About the Author

Dan Walters has been a journalist for nearly 60 years, spending all but a few of those years working for California newspapers. He began his professional career in 1960, at age 16, at the Humboldt Times. CalMatters is a public interest journalism venture committed to explaining how California’s state Capitol works and why it matters. For more columns by Dan Walters, go to calmatters.org/commentary.

Make Your Voice Heard

GV Wire encourages vigorous debate from people and organizations on local, state, and national issues. Submit your op-ed to rreed@gvwire.com for consideration.

GV Wire – Explore. Explain. Expose

California Legislators Whiff on ‘Spiraling Crisis’ in Home Insurance Market

About the Author

You may like

No Plan B: Democrats Risk All on Biden’s 2024 Bid

Medicare Advantage Increasingly Popular With Seniors — But Not Hospitals and Doctors

Pitching All-Star, Fresno Car Dealer C.J. Wilson Talks Ohtani ‘Sweepstakes’

Bezos-Backed Company Offers a New Way to Invest in the American Dream

The Battle for Gun Control: Newsom’s Proposed Amendment Sparks Controversy

Fresno Smoke Shop Raid Uncovers Illegal Cannabis, Gambling

The Holiday Spirit Is in Full Swing. Check Out This Valley Events Guide.

Fresno Council to Vote on Leasing Bitwise Building for New City Hall Team

GV Wire News Minute: Check Out the Trending Stories of the Week

CA Cities and Farms Will Get 10% of Requested State Water Supplies to Start 2024

Costa Defends His Actions on Reedley Lab Against Claims of Opponent, Right-Wing Activist O’Keefe

Walmart Latest Big Advertiser to Pull Out of Musk’s X Amid Widening Concerns Over Hate Speech, Reach

Zakaria: Another Casualty of War: Free Speech on Campus

Ian Bremmer: Is an Israel-Palestine Two-State Solution Possible?

Ian Bremmer: What’s Iran’s Next Move?

Cowboys vs. Seahawks Game Was a Better Show Than Newsom vs. DeSantis

Newsom vs. DeSantis: A Real Debate on the Issues or Just More Mudslinging?

California’s Utilities Commission, Other Consumer Watchdogs, Often Protect Big Companies

Closed-off Interstate 10 Is No Stranger to Major Damage or Political Attention

California Keeps Expanding School Curricula. What About Improving Key Subjects?

California Will Finally See a Highly Competitive Contest for U.S. Senate

Political and Economic Stakes Are High for San Francisco This Week

What Went Wrong at EDD? An Investigation of Its Managerial Meltdown

Will Gavin Newsom Wind up as One of California’s Unpopular Ex-Governors?

GV Wire News Minute: Check Out the Trending Stories of the Week

The DeSantis-Newsom Debate in Less Than 60 Seconds, Including the Poop Map

Wired Wednesday: The Latest on Income-Based PG&E Charges

You Can Find ‘This n’ That’ at Fresno Collectibles Shop

Actress Cynthia Nixon Leads Hunger Strike Outside White House, Demanding Gaza Ceasefire

Bulldog Volleyball Team Takes MWC Title, Faces Stanford in NCAA Tournament

Operation Christmas Presence Kicks Off Effort to Keep Shoppers Safe This Holiday Season

GV Wire Asks: ‘What Are You Thankful For?’

Wired Wednesday: Is California Putting Nonprofit Mental Health Providers at Risk?

Take a Look Inside the Sparkling New Clovis Senior Center

Tower Restaurant Fire Was Like What You’d See ‘in a Movie,’ Says Owner

Protesters Seeking Gaza Cease-Fire Force Dems to Cancel Convention Events in Sacramento