Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
California’s Messier, but Fairer, Redistricting Process
dan_walters
By Dan Walters, CalMatters Commentary
Published 3 years ago on
November 15, 2021

Share

For many decades, the decennial chore of redrawing California’s congressional and legislative districts was relatively simple.

Dan Walters

Opinion

Every 10 years, following the census, legislative and congressional leaders would hire some knowledgeable number-crunchers and privately divvy up the districts for purely political purposes.

If one party controlled both the Legislature and the governorship, it would maximize its ability to remain in power. The maps that the dominant Democrats drew up after the 1980 census was the last time California saw a blatantly partisan gerrymander.

Republicans howled and persuaded voters to overturn the plan via a referendum, but the state Supreme Court ordered that the rejected maps be used anyway for the 1982 elections, in which Democrats retained their control of the Legislature and the congressional delegation.

Assembly Speaker Willie Brown publicly thanked “Sister Rose and the Supremes” for helping his party overcome the referendum, referring to Chief Justice Rose Bird. It fueled a successful drive to oust Bird and two other justices when they stood for re-election four years later.

Redrawn Districts Favored Democrats

After the 1982 election, Democrats enacted a slightly altered version of the gerrymander and then-Gov. Jerry Brown signed it just before leaving office. The congressional map was particularly slanted toward Democrats and its primary creator, San Francisco Congressman Phil Burton, laconically called it “my contribution to modern art.”

Control of redistricting was the primary, if unspoken, issue of the 1990 campaign for governor, and after Republican Pete Wilson won he vetoed a new set of maps drawn by Democrats, throwing the issue into the state Supreme Court. The court generated maps of its own that allowed the Republicans to make some gains in the 1992 and 1994 elections.

Democrats once again controlled the Legislature and the governorship after the 2000 census, but a partisan gerrymander was blunted by other factors, including an implicit threat of intervention by the U.S. Department of Justice under President George W. Bush.

The upshot was a bipartisan gerrymander aimed at protecting all incumbents and preserving the partisan status quo in both the Legislature and Congress, while ignoring dramatic demographic shifts, including a big surge in Latino population.

Independent Commission Created

Overt gerrymandering ended a decade later, after voters approved two initiatives — hated by leaders of both parties — to shift the decennial mapmaking to an independent commission that would ignore partisan considerations, draw districts to follow, where possible, city and county boundaries and preserve “communities of interest.”

On the whole, the commission was faithful to its mission, but nevertheless, Democrats made big gains in congressional and legislative seats — eventually winning three-fourths of both as GOP voter strengthen plummeted.

With data from a new census — much delayed due to the COVID-19 pandemic — a new commission is working on new maps under a very tight deadline. It’s been a rather messy process — a “hot mess,” in the recent words of one commission member. Drafts of the new maps were released last week and it’s apparent that they are likely to change quite a bit before the Dec. 27 deadline.

That said, it’s obvious that Democrats will retain their overwhelming legislative and congressional supermajorities and could gain a few more seats simply because demographic trends continue to run their way.

Most of the uncertainty is in the 52 congressional districts — one fewer than before due to California’s slow population growth. Democrats are struggling to retain their paper-thin control of Congress, and a handful of toss-up seats in California could be the difference.

However, until the final maps are filed six weeks hence, no one can truly predict who will survive and whose careers will end.

About the Author

Dan Walters has been a journalist for nearly 60 years, spending all but a few of them working for California newspapers. He now writes for CalMatters, a public interest journalism venture committed to explaining how California’s state Capitol works and why it matters.  For more columns by Dan Walters, go to calmatters.org/commentary.

RELATED TOPICS:

DON'T MISS

Fashion Fair’s Forever 21 to Close. ‘Still a Ways to Go,’ Says Employee

DON'T MISS

Who Runs Elon Musk’s DOGE? Not Musk, the White House Says.

DON'T MISS

New Self-Pollinating Almond Tree Could Be Huge for a Big Fresno Cash Crop

DON'T MISS

Madera County Secures First Fentanyl-Related Homicide Conviction

DON'T MISS

Musk Team Seeks Access to IRS System With Taxpayers’ Records

DON'T MISS

Bannon Calls Musk a ‘Parasitic Illegal Immigrant’

DON'T MISS

Fresno Weather Forecast: Pretty as a Postcard

DON'T MISS

Kennedy Says ‘Nothing’ Off-Limits in Scrutinizing Chronic Disease

DON'T MISS

Judge Declines to Immediately Block Elon Musk or DOGE From Federal Data or Layoffs

DON'T MISS

NBA Playoff Race Heats Up as All-Star Break Ends

UP NEXT

California’s Aging Population Will Test Whether Its Demography Is Destiny

UP NEXT

CA Schools Still Fall Behind Despite Big Increases in Spending

UP NEXT

Editorials of The Times: Now Is Not the Time to Tune Out

UP NEXT

Look Past Elon Musk’s Chaos. There’s Something More Sinister at Work.

UP NEXT

The Deadly Truth: Record Number of Journalists Killed in 2024

UP NEXT

Will ‘Too Many Cooks’ Complicate LA’s Recovery From Deadly Fires?

UP NEXT

I Miss the Old Kanye, Not This Antisemitic Crashout

UP NEXT

This Isn’t the Donald Trump America Elected

UP NEXT

Trump Targets Troubled CA Bullet Train Project. Will He Kill It, Too?

UP NEXT

CA School Test Scores Trail Those of States Newsom Considers Culturally Backward

Madera County Secures First Fentanyl-Related Homicide Conviction

10 hours ago

Musk Team Seeks Access to IRS System With Taxpayers’ Records

11 hours ago

Bannon Calls Musk a ‘Parasitic Illegal Immigrant’

11 hours ago

Fresno Weather Forecast: Pretty as a Postcard

11 hours ago

Kennedy Says ‘Nothing’ Off-Limits in Scrutinizing Chronic Disease

11 hours ago

Judge Declines to Immediately Block Elon Musk or DOGE From Federal Data or Layoffs

11 hours ago

NBA Playoff Race Heats Up as All-Star Break Ends

11 hours ago

NASCAR’s Jeff Gordon Talks ‘Days of Thunder’ Sequel With Tom Cruise

12 hours ago

Adames Joins Giants, Excited to Team Up With Gold Glover Chapman

12 hours ago

Leonard Peltier Released After Biden Commuted Sentence in FBI Agents’ Killings

13 hours ago

Fashion Fair’s Forever 21 to Close. ‘Still a Ways to Go,’ Says Employee

Signs hung throughout fast-fashion clothing store Forever 21 show discounts ranging from 10% to 40% off the “entire store.” And,...

8 hours ago

8 hours ago

Fashion Fair’s Forever 21 to Close. ‘Still a Ways to Go,’ Says Employee

9 hours ago

Who Runs Elon Musk’s DOGE? Not Musk, the White House Says.

10 hours ago

New Self-Pollinating Almond Tree Could Be Huge for a Big Fresno Cash Crop

Fentanyl M30 Pills
10 hours ago

Madera County Secures First Fentanyl-Related Homicide Conviction

11 hours ago

Musk Team Seeks Access to IRS System With Taxpayers’ Records

FILE — Steve Bannon speaks to reporters outside State Supreme Court in Manhattan, Feb. 11, 2025. Stephen Bannon, a top adviser during President Trump’s first term and a key figure among his supporters, said Elon Musk wants to “play-act as God” as part of his push to overhaul the federal government. (Jefferson Siegel/The New York Times)
11 hours ago

Bannon Calls Musk a ‘Parasitic Illegal Immigrant’

11 hours ago

Fresno Weather Forecast: Pretty as a Postcard

11 hours ago

Kennedy Says ‘Nothing’ Off-Limits in Scrutinizing Chronic Disease

Help continue the work that gets you the news that matters most.

Search

Send this to a friend