Trump’s Quiet Power Grab
Share
[aggregation-styles]
The Atlantic Subscription
Throughout the federal government are thousands of officials who do not direct courtrooms, but who are, in a sense, judges. They are federal employees who preside over trial-like disputes, hear evidence and testimony, and make decisions that can deeply shape people’s lives, such as the granting of asylum and veterans benefits.
These executive-branch employees are administrative adjudicators.
The Trump administration has launched an obscure but dangerous effort to undermine this system, and to dictate both the appropriate circumstances for commencing adjudication and the rules that govern how disputes with agencies are resolved.
If the Trump administration’s strategy works, it will have steered the federal bureaucracy further toward an authoritarian future in which all executive-branch policy making must bend to the whims of a single individual, the president.
Although precise data are hard to find, recent work by two leading administrative-law scholars suggests there are roughly 12,000 of these agency adjudicators of various types across the federal bureaucracy, as compared with about 870 permanently authorized federal-court judges.
Read More →
The Atlantic Subscription
Throughout the federal government are thousands of officials who do not direct courtrooms, but who are, in a sense, judges. They are federal employees who preside over trial-like disputes, hear evidence and testimony, and make decisions that can deeply shape people’s lives, such as the granting of asylum and veterans benefits.
These executive-branch employees are administrative adjudicators.
The Trump administration has launched an obscure but dangerous effort to undermine this system, and to dictate both the appropriate circumstances for commencing adjudication and the rules that govern how disputes with agencies are resolved.
If the Trump administration’s strategy works, it will have steered the federal bureaucracy further toward an authoritarian future in which all executive-branch policy making must bend to the whims of a single individual, the president.
Although precise data are hard to find, recent work by two leading administrative-law scholars suggests there are roughly 12,000 of these agency adjudicators of various types across the federal bureaucracy, as compared with about 870 permanently authorized federal-court judges.
Read More →
By Peter M. Shane | 26 Feb 2020
RELATED TOPICS:
Caitlin Clark Will Miss at Least Two Weeks With Quad Strain
Sports /
2 hours ago
Valley Crime Stoppers’ Most Wanted Person of the Day: David Sanchez Montes
Latest /
2 hours ago
Trump Threatens Action as Clovis Prepares for CIF State Track Championships
Local /
2 hours ago
Fresno Police Arrest 20 for DUI During Enforcement Operation
Local /
2 hours ago
Ireland to Press Ahead With Trade Ban on Israeli-Occupied Areas
World /
3 hours ago
FBI Announces New Probes Into Dobbs Supreme Court Leak, White House Cocaine Incident
Crime /
3 hours ago
Latest
Videos

Water /
49 minutes ago
Eight More Drowning Deaths Added to Kern River Warning Signs

Sports /
2 hours ago
Caitlin Clark Will Miss at Least Two Weeks With Quad Strain

Latest /
2 hours ago
Valley Crime Stoppers’ Most Wanted Person of the Day: David Sanchez Montes

Local /
2 hours ago
Trump Threatens Action as Clovis Prepares for CIF State Track Championships

Local /
2 hours ago