Trump’s Quiet Power Grab
Share
[aggregation-styles]
The Atlantic Subscription
Throughout the federal government are thousands of officials who do not direct courtrooms, but who are, in a sense, judges. They are federal employees who preside over trial-like disputes, hear evidence and testimony, and make decisions that can deeply shape people’s lives, such as the granting of asylum and veterans benefits.
These executive-branch employees are administrative adjudicators.
The Trump administration has launched an obscure but dangerous effort to undermine this system, and to dictate both the appropriate circumstances for commencing adjudication and the rules that govern how disputes with agencies are resolved.
If the Trump administration’s strategy works, it will have steered the federal bureaucracy further toward an authoritarian future in which all executive-branch policy making must bend to the whims of a single individual, the president.
Although precise data are hard to find, recent work by two leading administrative-law scholars suggests there are roughly 12,000 of these agency adjudicators of various types across the federal bureaucracy, as compared with about 870 permanently authorized federal-court judges.
Read More →
The Atlantic Subscription
Throughout the federal government are thousands of officials who do not direct courtrooms, but who are, in a sense, judges. They are federal employees who preside over trial-like disputes, hear evidence and testimony, and make decisions that can deeply shape people’s lives, such as the granting of asylum and veterans benefits.
These executive-branch employees are administrative adjudicators.
The Trump administration has launched an obscure but dangerous effort to undermine this system, and to dictate both the appropriate circumstances for commencing adjudication and the rules that govern how disputes with agencies are resolved.
If the Trump administration’s strategy works, it will have steered the federal bureaucracy further toward an authoritarian future in which all executive-branch policy making must bend to the whims of a single individual, the president.
Although precise data are hard to find, recent work by two leading administrative-law scholars suggests there are roughly 12,000 of these agency adjudicators of various types across the federal bureaucracy, as compared with about 870 permanently authorized federal-court judges.
Read More →
By Peter M. Shane | 26 Feb 2020
RELATED TOPICS:
Sweet Lola on the Mend, Ready for a Forever Home
Animals /
19 hours ago
Clovis Daytime Burglary: 2 Suspects Arrested, 1 at Large
Crime /
1 day ago
Trump Stalled California Wildfire Aid? Ex-Aide Reveals Political Motive
Politics /
1 day ago
Russia Urges Citizens to Leave Israel as Tensions with Hezbollah Escalate
Russia has advised its citizens to leave Israel amid rising tensions with Hezbollah and Iran, reports Newsweek.
Moscow’s ambassador to...
World /
16 hours ago
Categories
Latest
Videos
World /
16 hours ago
Russia Urges Citizens to Leave Israel as Tensions with Hezbollah Escalate
Economy /
19 hours ago
Taxpayers in 24 States Will Be Able to File Their Returns Directly With the IRS in 2025
Business /
19 hours ago
California Collects Millions in Stolen Wages, but Can’t Find Many Workers to Pay Them
Animals /
19 hours ago