Donald Trump Wants to Curb Iran. Has He Gone About It the Right Way?
Share
[aggregation-styles]
The Economist Subscription
Masterstroke or madness?
The Killing of Qassem Suleimani by an American drone on January 3rd threatened to bring the United States and Iran closer to war than at any time since the hostage crisis in 1979. In a part of the world that has lost the power to shock, the audacious killing of Iran’s most important general, ordered by President Donald Trump, sent Iran reeling. In public ceremonies millions of Iranians put aside their discontent with the regime to mark General Suleimani’s death. Blood-curdling threats of destruction issued from the Middle East, echoed by warnings of mayhem from Western experts. And yet a retaliatory missile strike on two American bases in Iraq five days later killed nobody. It looked like a face-saving attempt by Iran to wind the crisis down.
If that were the end of it, Mr Trump would be right to say that his strike had worked, as he suggested on January 8th. Ridding the world of a baleful individual and forcing Iran to curb its aggression really would be worthwhile achievements. In the coming months, that may indeed be how things turn out. The trouble is that nobody, including Mr Trump, can count on it.
Two tests will define whether the killing of the general was a success—its effect on deterrence and on Iran’s regional power. For the past year Mr Trump has stood by as Iran and its proxies attacked merchant shipping in the Strait of Hormuz, two American drones, oil facilities in Saudi Arabia and military bases in Iraq. Because it had concluded that there was no price to pay, Iran was becoming more brazen and belligerent. The beneficial effect of the drone strike on January 3rd is to re-establish the idea that America is willing to hit back. Iran’s restraint on Tuesday this week signals that it does not want to face an aerial onslaught by America. Another Iranian missile strike is less likely today than it was just weeks ago.
Read More →
The Economist Subscription
Masterstroke or madness?
The Killing of Qassem Suleimani by an American drone on January 3rd threatened to bring the United States and Iran closer to war than at any time since the hostage crisis in 1979. In a part of the world that has lost the power to shock, the audacious killing of Iran’s most important general, ordered by President Donald Trump, sent Iran reeling. In public ceremonies millions of Iranians put aside their discontent with the regime to mark General Suleimani’s death. Blood-curdling threats of destruction issued from the Middle East, echoed by warnings of mayhem from Western experts. And yet a retaliatory missile strike on two American bases in Iraq five days later killed nobody. It looked like a face-saving attempt by Iran to wind the crisis down.
If that were the end of it, Mr Trump would be right to say that his strike had worked, as he suggested on January 8th. Ridding the world of a baleful individual and forcing Iran to curb its aggression really would be worthwhile achievements. In the coming months, that may indeed be how things turn out. The trouble is that nobody, including Mr Trump, can count on it.
Two tests will define whether the killing of the general was a success—its effect on deterrence and on Iran’s regional power. For the past year Mr Trump has stood by as Iran and its proxies attacked merchant shipping in the Strait of Hormuz, two American drones, oil facilities in Saudi Arabia and military bases in Iraq. Because it had concluded that there was no price to pay, Iran was becoming more brazen and belligerent. The beneficial effect of the drone strike on January 3rd is to re-establish the idea that America is willing to hit back. Iran’s restraint on Tuesday this week signals that it does not want to face an aerial onslaught by America. Another Iranian missile strike is less likely today than it was just weeks ago.
Read More →
9 Jan 2020
RELATED TOPICS:
Clovis, Sanger, Madera, and Bass Lake Will Light the Sky With Fireworks Shows Tonight
Events /
1 day ago
Oil Dips Ahead of Expected OPEC+ Output Increase
Economy /
1 day ago
613 Killed at Gaza Aid Distribution Sites, Near Humanitarian Covoys, Says UN
World /
1 day ago
Fresno County Authorities Investigating Suspicious Death of Transient Man
Crime /
1 day ago
Israeli Military Kills 20 in Gaza as Trump Awaits Hamas Reply to Truce Proposal
World /
1 day ago
Valley Crime Stoppers’ Most Wanted Person of the Day: Rachelle Maria Blanco
Local /
1 day ago
Russia Pounds Kyiv With Largest Drone Attack, Hours After Trump-Putin Call
World /
1 day ago
How Trump’s ‘Big, Beautiful Bill’ Will Make China Great Again
Can you hear it — that loud roar coming from the East? It’s the sound of 1.4 billion Chinese laughing at us.
Thomas L. Friedman
The New Yo...
Opinion /
11 hours ago
Categories
Latest
Videos

Opinion /
11 hours ago
How Trump’s ‘Big, Beautiful Bill’ Will Make China Great Again

Sports /
11 hours ago
What’s Caitlin Clark Worth to the WNBA? A Lot More Than Her $78,066 Salary.

Politics /
1 day ago
Trump to Sign Tax-Cut and Spending Bill in July 4 Ceremony

Events /
1 day ago
Clovis, Sanger, Madera, and Bass Lake Will Light the Sky With Fireworks Shows Tonight

Economy /
1 day ago
Oil Dips Ahead of Expected OPEC+ Output Increase

World /
1 day ago
613 Killed at Gaza Aid Distribution Sites, Near Humanitarian Covoys, Says UN

Crime /
1 day ago
Fresno County Authorities Investigating Suspicious Death of Transient Man

Video /
2 days ago