Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
Walters: Legislating by Whim
dan_walters
By Dan Walters, CalMatters Commentary
Published 5 years ago on
November 11, 2019

Share

The Democrats who dominate the state Legislature have developed a very bad habit — legislating by whim.
If they take a dislike to something or someone, they ban it. If they like something, they impose it on everyone and/or give it taxpayers’ money.


Dan Walters
Opinion
However, their whims, awash in self-righteousness, often violate not only common sense, but existing laws and even constitutional rights.
An excellent example was a law that required clinics offering non-abortion alternative services to pregnant women to post notices telling them about the availability of abortions.
Unfettered — and unquestioned — access to abortion is a Democratic Party shibboleth, so anything or anyone expressing an alternative viewpoint is, in the minds of legislators, an evil to be suppressed.
However — and predictably — the U.S. Supreme Court slapped it down as a violation of the U.S. Constitution’s right to free speech.
“By compelling petitioners to speak a particular message, it alters the content of (their) speech” and thus violates a previously enunciated judicial principle, the majority opinion declared.

One of the Legislature’s Evident Dislikes Is President Donald Trump

As that case illustrates, when the Legislature acts on one of its collective whims, it invites adult supervision. The Supreme Court provided it on the abortion notice law, and although he signed that law, former Gov. Jerry Brown vetoed some of the Legislature’s more immature outbursts.
Things changed when Gavin Newsom became governor this year. He has his own streak of impulsiveness, and has been willing, even eager, to tread where Brown did not.
One of the Legislature’s evident dislikes is President Donald Trump, so it passed a bill last year declaring that to appear on California’s presidential primary ballot, a candidate had to release his or her income tax returns.
However, Brown, who shares legislators’ disdain for Trump but had refused to release his own income tax returns, vetoed the measure.
“While I recognize the political attractiveness — even the merits — of getting President Trump’s tax returns … it may not be constitutional,” Brown warned, adding, “Today we require tax returns, but what would be next? Five years of health records? A certified birth certificate? High school report cards? And will these requirements vary depending on which political party is in power?”
Undeterred by Brown’s common sense, the Legislature passed a virtually identical bill this year. Newsom signed it, and — of course — characterized it as an expression of moral principle, rather than a constitutionally dubious and petty hit job.

Constitutionality Is Never a Barrier

In “extraordinary times,” Newsom declared, state officials “have a legal and moral duty to do everything in their power to ensure leaders seeking the highest offices meet minimal standards, and to restore public confidence.”

“The Legislature can then tack on any number of additional requirements? Where does it end? Do we get all their high school report cards?” — Justice Ming W. Chin
A federal judge quickly declared that the law violates the U.S. Constitution and last week, justices of the state Supreme Court questioned the measure’s logic and legality and signaled its doom.
“Would the Legislature be entitled to impose requirements that candidates produce birth certificate or psychotherapy records or affidavits that they have never committed adultery or been a member of the Communist Party?” Justice Joshua Groban asked the hapless state lawyer trying to defend the law’s legitimacy.
“The Legislature can then tack on any number of additional requirements?” asked Justice Ming W. Chin. “Where does it end? Do we get all their high school report cards?”
Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye made the most telling point — that the court searched the records to determine if the Legislature even consulted the state constitution before acting and “We didn’t find anything.”
The unspoken answer was that when the Legislature — and now the governor — enact one of their whims, constitutionality is never a barrier.
CalMatters is a public interest journalism venture committed to explaining how California’s state Capitol works and why it matters. For more stories by Dan Walters, go to calmatters.org/commentary
[activecampaign form=31]

DON'T MISS

Fashion Fair’s Forever 21 to Close. ‘Still a Ways to Go,’ Says Employee

DON'T MISS

Who Runs Elon Musk’s DOGE? Not Musk, the White House Says.

DON'T MISS

New Self-Pollinating Almond Tree Could Be Huge for a Big Fresno Cash Crop

DON'T MISS

Madera County Secures First Fentanyl-Related Homicide Conviction

DON'T MISS

Musk Team Seeks Access to IRS System With Taxpayers’ Records

DON'T MISS

Bannon Calls Musk a ‘Parasitic Illegal Immigrant’

DON'T MISS

Fresno Weather Forecast: Pretty as a Postcard

DON'T MISS

Kennedy Says ‘Nothing’ Off-Limits in Scrutinizing Chronic Disease

DON'T MISS

Judge Declines to Immediately Block Elon Musk or DOGE From Federal Data or Layoffs

DON'T MISS

NBA Playoff Race Heats Up as All-Star Break Ends

UP NEXT

California’s Aging Population Will Test Whether Its Demography Is Destiny

UP NEXT

CA Schools Still Fall Behind Despite Big Increases in Spending

UP NEXT

Editorials of The Times: Now Is Not the Time to Tune Out

UP NEXT

Look Past Elon Musk’s Chaos. There’s Something More Sinister at Work.

UP NEXT

The Deadly Truth: Record Number of Journalists Killed in 2024

UP NEXT

Will ‘Too Many Cooks’ Complicate LA’s Recovery From Deadly Fires?

UP NEXT

I Miss the Old Kanye, Not This Antisemitic Crashout

UP NEXT

This Isn’t the Donald Trump America Elected

UP NEXT

Trump Targets Troubled CA Bullet Train Project. Will He Kill It, Too?

UP NEXT

CA School Test Scores Trail Those of States Newsom Considers Culturally Backward

Madera County Secures First Fentanyl-Related Homicide Conviction

4 hours ago

Musk Team Seeks Access to IRS System With Taxpayers’ Records

5 hours ago

Bannon Calls Musk a ‘Parasitic Illegal Immigrant’

5 hours ago

Fresno Weather Forecast: Pretty as a Postcard

5 hours ago

Kennedy Says ‘Nothing’ Off-Limits in Scrutinizing Chronic Disease

5 hours ago

Judge Declines to Immediately Block Elon Musk or DOGE From Federal Data or Layoffs

5 hours ago

NBA Playoff Race Heats Up as All-Star Break Ends

5 hours ago

NASCAR’s Jeff Gordon Talks ‘Days of Thunder’ Sequel With Tom Cruise

5 hours ago

Adames Joins Giants, Excited to Team Up With Gold Glover Chapman

5 hours ago

Leonard Peltier Released After Biden Commuted Sentence in FBI Agents’ Killings

6 hours ago

Fashion Fair’s Forever 21 to Close. ‘Still a Ways to Go,’ Says Employee

Signs hung throughout fast-fashion clothing store Forever 21 show discounts ranging from 10% to 40% off the “entire store.” And,...

1 hour ago

1 hour ago

Fashion Fair’s Forever 21 to Close. ‘Still a Ways to Go,’ Says Employee

3 hours ago

Who Runs Elon Musk’s DOGE? Not Musk, the White House Says.

4 hours ago

New Self-Pollinating Almond Tree Could Be Huge for a Big Fresno Cash Crop

Fentanyl M30 Pills
4 hours ago

Madera County Secures First Fentanyl-Related Homicide Conviction

5 hours ago

Musk Team Seeks Access to IRS System With Taxpayers’ Records

FILE — Steve Bannon speaks to reporters outside State Supreme Court in Manhattan, Feb. 11, 2025. Stephen Bannon, a top adviser during President Trump’s first term and a key figure among his supporters, said Elon Musk wants to “play-act as God” as part of his push to overhaul the federal government. (Jefferson Siegel/The New York Times)
5 hours ago

Bannon Calls Musk a ‘Parasitic Illegal Immigrant’

5 hours ago

Fresno Weather Forecast: Pretty as a Postcard

5 hours ago

Kennedy Says ‘Nothing’ Off-Limits in Scrutinizing Chronic Disease

Help continue the work that gets you the news that matters most.

Search

Send this to a friend