Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Gavin Newsom’s Redistricting Plan Is on Its Way to Voters. What You Need to Know

15 hours ago

CARB Executive Leader Rips Trump’s EPA for Seeking to Kill Proven Climate Science

18 hours ago

California Lawmakers Advance First Two Bills in Democrats’ Redistricting Plan

18 hours ago

Judge Rules Alina Habba Was Unlawfully Appointed as US Attorney in New Jersey

19 hours ago

Trump Say He Will Go on Patrol in Washington With Police, Military

21 hours ago

Gov. Gavin Newsom’s Latest Role Is Social Media Troll

24 hours ago

California Supreme Court Paves the Way for Democrats’ Redistricting Plan

1 day ago

Why COVID Is Spreading Again This Summer

2 days ago

Most Americans Believe Countries Should Recognize Palestinian State, Reuters/Ipsos Poll Finds

2 days ago
California’s Pollution Enforcers Want to Save Tropical Forests. But at What Cost?
gvw_calmatters
By CalMatters
Published 6 years ago on
July 9, 2019

Share

California’s climate change enforcers are grappling with the thorniest of controversies: how to prevent the planet’s tropical forests from disappearing. The question they aren’t ready to answer — at least not yet — is what focusing on far-away forests could mean for pollution at home.


by Rachel Becker
CALmatters

Lawmakers made clear in a June letter reported by ProPublica that they’d like the California Air Resources Board to endorse something called the Tropical Forest Standard. It’s a playbook, still in draft form, for how to evaluate international states or provinces on their efforts to curb tropical deforestation. The guide is intended to direct investments to governments that monitor results, obtain public input, and protect the rights of indigenous peoples.
The stakes are higher than they’d seem for a playbook that California may not even use. Observers worry if California — the world’s fifth largest economy — puts its stamp of approval on the standard, it will send a signal to other governments to do the same. The concern is this might pave the way for land decisions that hurt forest-dwelling and indigenous peoples. It also might allow more pollution at home as industries use tropical forest investments to shield themselves from reducing their own emissions.
Even the lawmakers acknowledge in their letter that an endorsement will send “a green light” to companies and governments that hope to use tropical forest conservation credits as part of their broader mitigation strategies. The idea is that forests store carbon, and preserving them also prevents agriculture and industry from using the land to produce even more greenhouse gases.

The Practice Is Controversial

California’s greenhouse gas producers already can offset some emissions by investing in domestic forest conservation and methane capture from mining and manure. Saving tropical forests isn’t currently on that list — and given opposition, the air board is quick to say it might never be. Tropical forest investments might also come from carbon-trading systems outside California, government grants, or even from companies voluntarily looking to buy goodwill.
The oil and gas industry, for one, is a fan of offsets. Catherine Reheis-Boyd, president of the Western States Petroleum Association, said they’ve “proven critical” to California’s cap-and-trade program. “We support exploring and studying offset and other programs that could help our state meet its climate goals,” she said in an email.
But the practice is controversial and, as a ProPublica investigation recently revealed, has a long track record of failure. “You’d be trading certain, increased emissions for very uncertain, hoped-for reductions,” Kathleen McAfee, a professor of international relations at San Francisco State University, told CALmatters. A fire or political reversal, for instance, could undo years of forest preservation in an instant.
“We’re all on this planet, right?”
“Wouldn’t you be worried?” Mari Rose Taruc, climate justice coordinator for the California Environmental Justice Alliance, said. “We’re all on this planet, right? Shouldn’t we be doing the best we can, rather than a program that is full of holes?”

Impinging on Human Rights Abroad

The Environmental Defense Fund, a non-profit advocacy organization, is a major supporter of the tropical forest standard. The organization paid for three of the lawmakers who wrote to the air board  — Assemblymembers Richard Bloom, Ash Kalra, and Eloise Reyes — to travel to Acre, Brazil, to observe first-hand the state’s work to curb tropical deforestation. (The fourth assemblyman to sign the letter is Eduardo Garcia; staffer Katie Valenzuela went on the EDF-funded trip in his place.)

“We thought it would be important to give people the opportunity to see for themselves what this state has done—and to hear directly from indigenous and local leaders what their experience has been.” — Steve Schwartzman, Environmental Defense Fund
“We thought it would be important to give people the opportunity to see for themselves what this state has done — and to hear directly from indigenous and local leaders what their experience has been,” said Steve Schwartzman, senior director of tropical forest policy for EDF. Schwartzman helped translate for lawmakers during the trip, alongside translators provided by the Acre government. “I think they got a clear sense in Acre that the idea of a whole tropical forest jurisdiction being able to reduce its statewide emissions by reducing deforestation is feasible.”
None of the four lawmakers talked to CALmatters for this story despite repeated requests. In their letter, however, they, acknowledged several concerns raised by those who oppose the tropical forest playbook because they think it won’t work. Key among those is a phenomenon known as leakage — that saving one forest will lead to deforestation in another. It also can be difficult to tell whether investments will preserve vulnerable stretches of forest or just pour money into land that would have been protected anyway. And the environmental justice community is worried about impinging on human rights abroad while allowing industries to continue polluting their neighborhoods at home.
That’s why the lawmakers who wrote the letter advocated caution. “We think ARB should endorse the (tropical forest standard) while committing to vigorous and proactive monitoring of any jurisdiction that decides to utilize it,” the letter said. “There is still a lot of uncertainty on whether (it) will be successful in protecting forests and the people who inhabit them.”

Concerns About a Land Grab

Barbara Haya, a research fellow at the University of California, Berkeley and expert in forest offsets, suspects that kind of monitoring will be impossible for California. “It cannot be, should not be the role of California to monitor programs around the world that use the standard it puts out,” she said.
Taruc is concerned a California endorsement of the standard would set the stage for a carbon market that incentivizes land grabs from indigenous peoples. “It’s introducing another way for foreign companies and foreign investors to occupy the land that [indigenous peoples] have, for thousands of years, lived on,” she said.
Jason Gray, chief of the air board’s climate change program evaluation branch, contends the goal would be to work with governments, not companies. “The standard is developed so there is that transparency and oversight,” he said. “This is not a land sale or land grab approach.”
He points to a recent letter from José Gregorio Diaz Mirabal on behalf of the Coordinating Body for Indigenous Organizations of the Amazon. Mirabel said the organizations support the tropical forest standard, “not only to recognize the value of the service we provide as defenders of the forests, which are our life, but also to push tropical forest governments to respect the rights of indigenous communities.”
Ultimately, it will be up to the air board whether to endorse the tropical forest standard — and weeks after receiving the letter, they’re still weighing their next move.
“We’re working on how we guarantee to those legislators that we’re doing what they ask,” Dave Clegern, a spokesperson for the air board, told CALmatters“Of course, the clock is ticking. We are ultimately running out of time on these things.”
CALmatters.org is a nonprofit, nonpartisan media venture explaining California policies and politics.
[activecampaign form=19]

DON'T MISS

What Are Fresno Real Estate Experts Predicting for 2025 and Beyond?

DON'T MISS

First California EV Mandates Hit Automakers This Year. Most Are Not Even Close

DON'T MISS

Gavin Newsom’s Redistricting Plan Is on Its Way to Voters. What You Need to Know

DON'T MISS

Singer Lil Nas X Arrested After Charging at Officers, Police Say

DON'T MISS

Fresno Doctor on Bubonic Plague: It’s Rare But It’s Out There. Prevention Is Key

DON'T MISS

My Friend Joseph Castro, Former Fresno State President and CSU Chancellor, Is Receiving Hospice Care

DON'T MISS

More Americans Applying for Refugee Status in Canada, Data Shows

DON'T MISS

US Supreme Court Lets Trump Cut Diversity-Related NIH Grants

DON'T MISS

CARB Executive Leader Rips Trump’s EPA for Seeking to Kill Proven Climate Science

DON'T MISS

California Lawmakers Advance First Two Bills in Democrats’ Redistricting Plan

DON'T MISS

US State Department Says Continuous Vetting Covers 55 Million Visa Holders

DON'T MISS

Judge Rules Alina Habba Was Unlawfully Appointed as US Attorney in New Jersey

UP NEXT

California’s Finances Face a Perfect Storm. It Could Eventually Lead to Another Tax Hike

UP NEXT

What Trump Is Really Up to With the Military Occupation of DC

UP NEXT

Immigrant Students Shape California’s Future. Don’t Close the Door on Them

UP NEXT

Trump’s Domestic Deployments Are Dangerous. For the Military

UP NEXT

How Do We Bridge America’s New Segregation?

UP NEXT

California Legislature’s Final Weeks Could Decide Delta Water Tunnel’s Fate

UP NEXT

Outside Lands 2025: Where Music, Love, and Community Collide

UP NEXT

California Was a Model for Transparency. Now the Capitol Operates in the Dark

UP NEXT

It’s Not Too Late for Islas and Levine to ‘Get in Good Trouble’

UP NEXT

Newsom’s Congressional Redistricting Drive in California Faces Tall Hurdles

My Friend Joseph Castro, Former Fresno State President and CSU Chancellor, Is Receiving Hospice Care

17 hours ago

More Americans Applying for Refugee Status in Canada, Data Shows

17 hours ago

US Supreme Court Lets Trump Cut Diversity-Related NIH Grants

18 hours ago

CARB Executive Leader Rips Trump’s EPA for Seeking to Kill Proven Climate Science

18 hours ago

California Lawmakers Advance First Two Bills in Democrats’ Redistricting Plan

18 hours ago

US State Department Says Continuous Vetting Covers 55 Million Visa Holders

18 hours ago

Judge Rules Alina Habba Was Unlawfully Appointed as US Attorney in New Jersey

19 hours ago

Fresno Man with Prior Felonies Charged with Meth, Fentanyl, and Ammunition

19 hours ago

Fresno Goes to Court to Fight Trump Rule Stripping Grants Over Woke Language

19 hours ago

‘Where’s the Humanity in This?’ Hear ICE Detainee Describe Being Ripped From Family

19 hours ago

Gavin Newsom’s Redistricting Plan Is on Its Way to Voters. What You Need to Know

This story was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters. Gov. Gavin Newsom’s plan to counter President Donald Trump...

15 hours ago

California State Sen. Christopher Cabaldon
15 hours ago

Gavin Newsom’s Redistricting Plan Is on Its Way to Voters. What You Need to Know

Lil Nas X attends the Vanity Fair Oscars party after the 97th Academy Awards, in Beverly Hills, California, U.S., March 2, 2025. (Reuters File)
16 hours ago

Singer Lil Nas X Arrested After Charging at Officers, Police Say

bubonic plague squirrel
16 hours ago

Fresno Doctor on Bubonic Plague: It’s Rare But It’s Out There. Prevention Is Key

Joseph Castro (right), former Fresno State president and CSU chancellor, is receiving hospice care, with his family requesting privacy and prayers while community members can share messages of support online. (Special to GV Wire)
17 hours ago

My Friend Joseph Castro, Former Fresno State President and CSU Chancellor, Is Receiving Hospice Care

Flags fly above the Peace Arch, at a Canada-U.S. border crossing known as the Peace Arch Border Crossing in Blaine, Washington, U.S. April 2, 2025. (Reuters File)
17 hours ago

More Americans Applying for Refugee Status in Canada, Data Shows

General view shows The United States Supreme Court, in Washington, U.S., February 8, 2024. (Reuters File)
18 hours ago

US Supreme Court Lets Trump Cut Diversity-Related NIH Grants

Dr. Steven Cliff
18 hours ago

CARB Executive Leader Rips Trump’s EPA for Seeking to Kill Proven Climate Science

California Governor Gavin Newsom speaks to the press after a hearing on the use of National Guard troops amid federal immigration sweeps, at the California State Supreme Court in San Francisco, California, U.S., June 12, 2025. (Reuters FIle)
18 hours ago

California Lawmakers Advance First Two Bills in Democrats’ Redistricting Plan

Search

Help continue the work that gets you the news that matters most.

Send this to a friend