Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
Walters: Bill Reduces Ballot Measure Transparency
dan_walters
By Dan Walters, CalMatters Commentary
Published 6 years ago on
June 19, 2019

Share

Given their druthers, many government officials would prefer to do their business – our business, actually – behind closed doors and provide sanitized, self-serving versions of their actions after the fact.


Dan Walters
CALmatters

Journalists and governmental watchdogs struggle constantly to overcome the tendency toward secrecy and obfuscation, sometimes winning and often losing.
Two years ago, in a rare display of support for transparency in governmental finance, the Legislature and then-Gov. Jerry Brown required local governments and school districts to tell voters how proposed bond and tax issues would affect constituents’ tax bills.
That’s common sense and good government, but local officials complained that the new law, Assembly Bill 195, would be too difficult to implement.
More likely, however, they feared that including an estimate of tax consequences in the brief ballot summary would crowd out their pitches for passage and that telling voters that their tax bills would increase might discourage them from approving the measures.

Local Officials Still Don’t Like the Law

Last year, the disdain of local officials for the law manifested itself in a budget “trailer bill” that would suspend the transparency law for two years – thereby exempting hundreds of 2018 bond and tax measures.
The author of AB 195, Assemblyman Jay Obernolte, a Big Bear Lake Republican, said the trailer bill was drafted by the Legislature’s Democratic leadership without his knowledge.
For whatever reason, the exemption bill was not taken to a floor vote. Therefore, Obernolte’s disclosure law remained in effect for local tax and bond measures in 2018.
Local officials still don’t like the law and have waged a low-profile drive in the Legislature to get it repealed or watered down and, not surprisingly, a new bill has popped up to fulfill their hopes.
Last week, Sen. Scott Wiener, a San Francisco Democrat, did a “gut-and-amend” maneuver on one of his bills, Senate Bill 268. The measure, which had dealt with welfare benefits and already had passed the Senate, was stripped of its contents and a new bill was inserted.
It would allow local officials to remove the required information about tax consequences from the ballot summary that voters read before casting their votes and place it, instead, in the voter pamphlet or another separate statement, where it would get much less attention.
[activecampaign form=19]  

SB 268 Is Just What Local Officialdom Wants

Moreover, the bill declares, “Failure to comply with this chapter shall not affect the validity of any bond issue following the sale and delivery of the bonds,” which basically lets local officials entirely off the hook.

SB 268 is just what local officialdom wants – a new law that purports to give voters vital information about tax and bond measures but ensures that the data will be buried in official paperwork and that failure to provide it won’t be penalized.
SB 268 is just what local officialdom wants – a new law that purports to give voters vital information about tax and bond measures but ensures that the data will be buried in official paperwork and that failure to provide it won’t be penalized.
A Wiener spokesman, however, said the senator’s motive is “to make it clear what they (voters) are voting on,” asserting that the 75-word limit on ballot summaries isn’t enough space to adequately explain tax consequences of ballot measures and thus voters might reject taxes and bonds they otherwise would support. “A 75-word limit confuses voters,” he said.
That rationale parrots what local officials have been saying. One might suspect that Wiener is carrying the bill to placate those officials because they had been angered by his authorship of a highly controversial housing bill. That measure, Senate Bill 50, would have overridden local zoning laws to authorize high-density housing near public transit services but was buried in an avalanche of local government opposition.
CALmatters is a public interest journalism venture committed to explaining how California’s state Capitol works and why it matters. For more stories by Dan Walters, go to calmatters.org/commentary.

DON'T MISS

What Are Fresno Real Estate Experts Predicting for 2025 and Beyond?

DON'T MISS

First California EV Mandates Hit Automakers This Year. Most Are Not Even Close

DON'T MISS

Biden’s IRS Doubled Audits on the Wealthy, Data Shows

DON'T MISS

Millions Would Lose Their Obamacare Coverage Under Trump’s Bill

DON'T MISS

New CA Bill Would Streamline Solar Conversion for Dry Farmland

DON'T MISS

Supreme Court Rules Catholic Charity Exempt From State Unemployment Taxes

DON'T MISS

Alonso Muscles Up With 2 HRs, 5 RBIs as Mets Belt Dodgers

DON'T MISS

Valley Crime Stoppers’ Most Wanted Person of the Day: Fermin Solorzano

DON'T MISS

Supreme Court Rejects Mexico’s $10B Gun Lawsuit Against American Gun Manufacturers

DON'T MISS

Trump Says After Xi Call That US and China Will Resume Trade Talks

DON'T MISS

Procter & Gamble Slashes Workforce as Tariffs Drive Up Costs

DON'T MISS

Giants Score 6 Runs! Ramos Delivers Key Double in Win Over Padres

UP NEXT

Really, Secretary Rubio? I’m Lying About the Kids Dying Under Trump?

UP NEXT

After Years of Undrinkable Water, Our Rural California Community Finally Has Hope

UP NEXT

Why Trump Is Mad at ‘Sleazebag’ Leonard Leo

UP NEXT

Newsom Tussles With Local Officials Over Homelessness

UP NEXT

California’s War Over Charter Schools Rages On in Court

UP NEXT

Why Did the California Senate Shunt a Cost-Cutting Housing Bill?

UP NEXT

Fresno’s Crime Beat Didn’t Prepare Me for What I Saw on a Ride Along

UP NEXT

The MAGA Revolution Threatens America’s Most Innovative Place

UP NEXT

California’s High Living Costs and Rampant Poverty Sharpen Its Economic Divide

UP NEXT

Three Well-Tested Ways to Undermine an Autocrat

Were Cuts in Rooftop Solar Payments Legal? CA Supreme Court Hears Arguments

3 hours ago

Fresno Rainbow Pride Marks 35th Year with Saturday Parade and Festival

4 hours ago

Did That Clint Eastwood Interview Happen? Yes, Kind Of.

4 hours ago

Biden’s IRS Doubled Audits on the Wealthy, Data Shows

4 hours ago

Millions Would Lose Their Obamacare Coverage Under Trump’s Bill

4 hours ago

New CA Bill Would Streamline Solar Conversion for Dry Farmland

5 hours ago

Supreme Court Rules Catholic Charity Exempt From State Unemployment Taxes

5 hours ago

Alonso Muscles Up With 2 HRs, 5 RBIs as Mets Belt Dodgers

5 hours ago

Valley Crime Stoppers’ Most Wanted Person of the Day: Fermin Solorzano

5 hours ago

Supreme Court Rejects Mexico’s $10B Gun Lawsuit Against American Gun Manufacturers

5 hours ago

Fresno Police Want Your Tips to Solve Taylor Washington Homicide

Fresno police detectives want the community’s help to solve the shooting death of 24-year-old Taylor Washington on April 10. When offi...

1 hour ago

1 hour ago

Fresno Police Want Your Tips to Solve Taylor Washington Homicide

3 hours ago

Derek Carr Explains Mysterious Retirement. He Didn’t Want to ‘Just Take the Saints’ Money’

3 hours ago

What Do Valley Leaders Say About Trump’s Threat to Yank High-Speed Rail Funding?

3 hours ago

Were Cuts in Rooftop Solar Payments Legal? CA Supreme Court Hears Arguments

4 hours ago

Fresno Rainbow Pride Marks 35th Year with Saturday Parade and Festival

4 hours ago

Did That Clint Eastwood Interview Happen? Yes, Kind Of.

4 hours ago

Biden’s IRS Doubled Audits on the Wealthy, Data Shows

4 hours ago

Millions Would Lose Their Obamacare Coverage Under Trump’s Bill

Help continue the work that gets you the news that matters most.

Search

Send this to a friend