Can I just call in Jack Nicholson to give Steve Brandau and Garry Bredefeld the full “You Can’t Handle the Truth” treatment?

If anyone deserves a big-league butt-chewing from the fictional Col. Nathan Jessup, it’s the north Fresno councilmen who find themselves buffeted by the city’s newly liberal political winds.

Portrait of GV Wire News Director/Columnist Bill McEwen

Opinion

Bill McEwen

A New Council Majority Calls the Shots

Now that the shoe’s on the other foot and their progressive colleagues are calling the shots, Brandau and Bredefeld suddenly are all about equality and staunch opponents of class warfare.

Tell that to south Fresno residents who were abandoned long ago by a City Hall that pointed in one direction — north — and never much concerned itself with figuring out how to pay for parks, sidewalks, roads, sewers, and storm drains — in any part of town.

In the name of affordability (Hey, folks! Fresno is cheaper than everywhere else!) our city chewed through land with nary a look in the rear-view mirror. Meanwhile, Doc Buchanan had figured out that families would pay a lot more to live in a city (Clovis) with really good schools.

The Trump Economy is booming. The city budget is growing. Yet, the city’s roads are in worse shape than they were a decade ago.

Toss in Fresno’s long history of segregation and decades of failed Fresno Unified leadership and our once friendly farm town morphed into an urban economic train wreck.

“Is it right for us to make the citizens of north Fresno to pay for the sins of the past?” asked Brandau on Monday.

Well, if not north Fresno residents, then who, Steve-o?

Day of Atonement

That’s the problem with sins. It’s all fun and games until the Day of Atonement.

Fresno is staring into the mouth of a lion. Think about it. The city’s unemployment rate has been below double digits for nearly two years. The Trump Economy is booming. The city budget is growing.

Yet, the city’s roads are in worse shape than they were a decade ago. About $600 million in repairs are needed. Thanks to the state gas hike, Fresno has an extra $12 million this year and will get $9 million more annually over the next four years.

What we have here is progressives and conservatives locked up in a street fight for scraps of funding. Expect many more — over parks, hiring cops, and development.

No Vote for Brandau But Plenty of Theatrics

But this particular fight is over already.

Mayor Lee Brand pulled the rug on the lame-duck Brandau by delaying the vote on the spending plan a week.

It’s off to the Fresno County Board of Supervisors for Brandau, who spent his last weeks on the council trying to criminalize residents for giving a homeless person a bottle of water and muttering such inanities as “South Fresno already receives a crapload of money unavailable to north Fresno.”

As councilman Miguel Arias points out, while Brandau repeatedly cites $70 million in state Transformative Climate Communities funding coming to downtown, Chinatown, and southwest Fresno, he fails to mention the $139 million Veterans Boulevard project underway in northwest Fresno.

There’s a term for such an oversight: political amnesia.

Brandau exits thoroughly thrashed on his last two hot-button issues. Not that he cares. All the insults tossed at his colleagues achieved their intended purpose: feeding red meat to his conservative base. Probably his only regret is that he forgot to throw in a couple of “poverty pimps” for extra measure.

Brand, Progressives Will Work Out a Deal

Mayor Brand now has a week to do what he does best: pore through the numbers, consult with experts, hash out a compromise, and declare a “win-win” when it’s all over. Unlike Brandau and Bredefeld, the mayor is a realist and disinterested in feeding the social media beast.

Brand knows that the progressives, with Arias leading the charge, have the wind at their backs, are well-organized, and eager for public tussles. The mayor knows, too, that his path to re-election is making good on the promise he made in 2016: He, the kid who grew up on McKenzie Avenue in the rough part of town, will do what’s best for all of Fresno.

If not for November’s election results, Brand likely could’ve skated on that promise in 2020. But two of his endorsed candidates lost — Arias beating Tate Hill and Nelson Esparza clipping Brian Whelan — and the often ignored side of the city suddenly had City Hall clout.

Legislation Calls for Fair Distribution of Funds

Arias told me that he’s “95% confident” the councilmembers and the mayor will arrive at a satisfactory solution. In the best-case scenario, they’ll agree on the outline of a plan for future years, too.

But I will also remind Arias and others that the gas tax hike legislation included this clause: “Fairly distribute the economic impact of increased funding.” Meaning: Everybody who fills their gas tanks gets something.

In my book, neighborhoods in south Fresno annexed back in 1913 deserve sidewalks before a north Fresno street gets a median repair.

Equity or equality?

In my book, neighborhoods in south Fresno annexed back in 1913 deserve sidewalks before a north Fresno street gets a median repair. And kids who walk to school on dirt or in the street anywhere should get sidewalks ASAP. Muir Elementary School, near Palm and Belmont avenues, opened decades ago and there are still no sidewalks.

However, I concur with Fresno Public Works Director Scott Mozier that it’s best not to let streets deteriorate to the point a complete rebuild is needed.

It’s always a juggling act, more so in Fresno, where the sins of the past haunt us each and every day.

Does North Fresno Really Want Equality?

If equality, not equity, between north and south Fresno is what Brandau, Bredefeld, and others want, they best be prepared to handle the truth.

Along with the arrival of more industrial plants, landfills, recycling centers, affordable housing projects, dirt paths, and liquor stores.

Watch: Jack Nicholson’s Oscar Nominated Performance

2 Responses

  1. Myron Ybarra

    Maintaining roads and infrastructure should be done on as an as need basis and I believe it’s appropriate to use city funds to cover the expense of maintenance however I agree w/Brandau, expense of upgrading these areas should be borne by private investment (ensuring no gentrification through established laws) and the people in those communities. Likewise, IMHO new developments in the North and West communities should not be able to dip into the coffers for new infrastructure (roads, water/sewage, utilities, fire & police stations and schools) at the cost of all Fresno taxpayers. A Mello Roos tax should be levied on those businesses, people and families who purchase homes and/or parcels in the new area which would fund building and staffing of new infrastructure.

    It’s evident you have a partisan liberal view however city governance isn’t political, it’s done for the good of the people in the community and should be bipartisan.

    Reply
  2. Martin Querin

    Veterans Blvd is the key to Southwest Economic Revitalization

    Understanding Bill McEwen’s perspective regarding south and north investment, I don’t agree with his characterization of Veterans Boulevard as funding simply to benefit northwest Fresno; I think it is imperative to put Veterans in its proper perspective…it is not a Northwest entitlement. People in north Fresno are not looking to use Veterans Boulevard to drive to southwest Fresno. Veterans Boulevard will connect southwest and west Fresno residents to jobs, shopping, medical services and other services that are located primarily in north Fresno. It also provides the catalyst and a part of the solution to finally remove the south-north and east-west disconnects that exists in our community. It should also be noted that Veterans Boulevard is nearly 100% funded and that without any funding from SB-1 gas tax.

    Re-development (Brownfield vs greenfield) is the most expensive form of development. The only way that works economically is with land values that are high enough to warrant the additional development costs. Veterans Blvd allows the development on the west to continue to extend south. It provides the economic vehicle to raise property values all along the western fringe and as development moves south it will positively impact the value of property in southwest Fresno.

    It has been a long time since anything has had a significant impact on southwest property values, isolating the southwest homeowners from the same level of value increase seen in other areas of the Fresno-Clovis Metro region. It’s time to build this major roadway and provide the access and circulation that is available in the rest of the Metro Region. We are only $10 million short of $139-million to fund this project and there is an upcoming push at both the Federal and State level to get the funding.

    Access is what breaks down the walls that divide us, Veterans Blvd will provide better circulation and access and help ensure that an isolated part of our City has the same level of access you have along Friant, or in the northeast on the 168 and east on the 180. Access is the key to economic revitalization. Every leader in the City and County should be doing all they can to get this moved forward. Every resident west of the 99 should be talking to their local and State elected representatives so that they hear us with one voice – build this road.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

We've got issues, and we're willing to share
(but only if you want them in your inbox).