Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
Walters: State Tax Reforms or State Tax Increases?
dan_walters
By Dan Walters, CalMatters Commentary
Published 6 years ago on
January 16, 2019

Share

There is a substantial list of governance issues that former Gov. Jerry Brown said were important, but that he left on his desk for successor Gavin Newsom.


Opinion
Dan Walters
CALmatters Commentary

As Brown annually introduced new state budgets, he would warn about the state’s precarious dependence on a very narrow and volatile revenue source – income taxes on California’s most affluent residents.
For instance, although he and the Legislature enacted a very modest reform of public employee pensions, he repeatedly said it was only a first step and more was needed to make pension systems financially sound.
Brown never returned to the issue, however, and unfunded pension liabilities remain stubbornly high, forcing state and local governments to cough up ever-greater amounts of money to keep the pension systems afloat.
Early in his second stint as governor, Brown called reforming the California Environmental Quality Act “the Lord’s work,” because it was being misused to block badly needed public and private projects. However, Brown never made a serious effort at reform while granting specific projects, particularly professional sports arenas, CEQA relief.
And then there’s tax reform.
As Brown annually introduced new state budgets, he would warn about the state’s precarious dependence on a very narrow and volatile revenue source – income taxes on California’s most affluent residents.
Tax reform was needed, he would acknowledge to reporters, while adding, in effect, that it was too difficult politically for him to make it happen.

Problem Worsened During Brown’s Second Governorship

In fact, the problem worsened markedly during Brown’s second governorship, thanks to a very progressive income tax system and his persuading voters to raise tax rates on high-income Californians.
When Brown reoccupied the office in 2011, income taxes accounted for about half of the state’s general fund revenues, but by the time he departed eight years later, they supplied 70 percent. The share of revenue from capital gains – the most unpredictable income – doubled during the period to nearly 10 percent. The top 1 percent of taxpayers generate nearly half of state income taxes.
It’s why Newsom, in his 2019-20 budget, projects that a moderate recession would cost the state about $25 billion a year in lost revenue.
Instead of reforming taxes to make the state’s revenue stream more dependable, Brown established a “rainy day fund” and other reserves to cushion the impact of a recession. But at best, they would cover about a quarter of the projected $70-75 billion in revenue losses over three years of recession.
Newsom says he’s “concerned about what’s on the horizon” and reiterates both the perils of revenue volatility and his interest in overhauling the state’s tax system.

Politically Difficult to Lower State’s Dependence on the Rich

It would, as Brown often said, be politically difficult to lower the state’s dependence on the rich and, implicitly, shift a greater share of the revenue stream to those in lower income brackets.

While Newsom, unlike Brown, says he will try to make tax reform happen, he also may need a net increase in revenues to finance the promises he’s made on health care, early childhood education and other expensive entitlements.
During Arnold Schwarzenegger’s governorship, he and legislative leaders appointed a blue-ribbon commission to study revenue volatility and recommend ways to reduce it. A very divided commission recommended to shift some burden to a broader version of the sales tax, but its report was quickly relegated to the political dust bin.
Meanwhile, a coalition of liberal groups has qualified a measure for the 2020 ballot that would remove Proposition 13’s property tax limits from commercial property, generating perhaps $10 billion more in annual revenue. Business groups are vowing to spend $100 million on an opposition campaign.
While Newsom, unlike Brown, says he will try to make tax reform happen, he also may need a net increase in revenues to finance the promises he’s made on health care, early childhood education and other expensive entitlements.
So would a Newsom tax plan really be reform, or just a way to increase Californians’ tax bite which, in overall terms, is already one of the nation’s highest?
CALmatters is a public interest journalism venture committed to explaining how California’s state Capitol works and why it matters. For more stories by Dan Walters, go to calmatters.org/commentary.

DON'T MISS

Elon Musk Sells X to His Own xAI for $33 Billion in All-Stock Deal

DON'T MISS

US Naval Academy Ends Affirmative Action in Admissions

DON'T MISS

Elon Musk Backtracks on a Legally Questionable Plan to Pay Voters

DON'T MISS

Appeals Court Clears Way for DOGE to Keep Operating at USAID

DON'T MISS

Trump Pledges US Aid for Asia Quake Despite Former Official Saying System in ‘Shambles’

DON'T MISS

Is Fresno Political Consultant Alex Tavlian Behind Election Attack Mailer?

DON'T MISS

Gronk-a-Mania Set to Run Wild Over WrestleMania Weekend

DON'T MISS

Federal Judge Blocks Trump From Dismantling Consumer Financial Protection Bureau

DON'T MISS

St. Agnes’ Newest Robot Promises Less Invasive Surgeries, Faster Recoveries

DON'T MISS

California Food Banks Brace for Funding Cuts, and Not Only From the Trump Administration

UP NEXT

If California Bails Out LA’s $1 Billion Budget Deficit, Beware the Slippery Slope

UP NEXT

Trump Has Had Enough. He Is Not Alone.

UP NEXT

The Real Crisis in California Schools Is Low Achievement, Not Cultural Conflicts

UP NEXT

Trump and Musk Are Suffering From Soros Derangement Syndrome

UP NEXT

CA Politicians Have an Irritating Habit of Ignoring the Downsides

UP NEXT

If Pete Hegseth Had Any Honor, He Would Resign

UP NEXT

If Zero-Emission Cars Cut Gasoline Sales and Tax Revenue, How Will California Replace Them?

UP NEXT

How Israel Divides the Right

UP NEXT

Under Pressure From Trump, UC Abandons ‘Diversity Statement’ Requirement for Faculty

UP NEXT

California Seniors Are Paying the Price for Lawsuit Abuse 

Appeals Court Clears Way for DOGE to Keep Operating at USAID

16 hours ago

Trump Pledges US Aid for Asia Quake Despite Former Official Saying System in ‘Shambles’

16 hours ago

Is Fresno Political Consultant Alex Tavlian Behind Election Attack Mailer?

16 hours ago

Gronk-a-Mania Set to Run Wild Over WrestleMania Weekend

17 hours ago

Federal Judge Blocks Trump From Dismantling Consumer Financial Protection Bureau

17 hours ago

St. Agnes’ Newest Robot Promises Less Invasive Surgeries, Faster Recoveries

17 hours ago

California Food Banks Brace for Funding Cuts, and Not Only From the Trump Administration

18 hours ago

Why the Nation Would Be Wise to Support a Third Term Amendment for Donald Trump

18 hours ago

RIP, Bill Lyles: One of Fresno’s Most Iconic Builders and Philanthropists

19 hours ago

Madera Authorities Seize 80 Pounds of Meth, Arrest Two Suspects

19 hours ago

Elon Musk Sells X to His Own xAI for $33 Billion in All-Stock Deal

JACKSONVILLE, Mi — Elon Musk has sold social media site X to his own xAI artificial intelligence company in a $33 billion all-stock deal, th...

15 hours ago

15 hours ago

Elon Musk Sells X to His Own xAI for $33 Billion in All-Stock Deal

15 hours ago

US Naval Academy Ends Affirmative Action in Admissions

15 hours ago

Elon Musk Backtracks on a Legally Questionable Plan to Pay Voters

16 hours ago

Appeals Court Clears Way for DOGE to Keep Operating at USAID

16 hours ago

Trump Pledges US Aid for Asia Quake Despite Former Official Saying System in ‘Shambles’

16 hours ago

Is Fresno Political Consultant Alex Tavlian Behind Election Attack Mailer?

17 hours ago

Gronk-a-Mania Set to Run Wild Over WrestleMania Weekend

17 hours ago

Federal Judge Blocks Trump From Dismantling Consumer Financial Protection Bureau

Help continue the work that gets you the news that matters most.

Search

Send this to a friend