Share
OAKLAND — A U.S. judge in California on Sunday blocked Trump administration rules, which would allow more employers to opt out of providing women with no-cost birth control, from taking effect in 13 states and Washington, D.C.
But Gilliam limited the scope of the ruling to the plaintiffs, rejecting their request that he block the rules nationwide.
The changes would allow more employers, including publicly traded companies, to opt out of providing no-cost contraceptive coverage to women by claiming religious objections. Some private employers could also object on moral grounds.
California and the other states argue that women would be forced to turn to state-funded programs for birth control and experience unintended pregnancies.
“The law couldn’t be more clear — employers have no business interfering in women’s healthcare decisions,” California Attorney General Xavier Becerra said in a statement Sunday. “Today’s court ruling stops another attempt by the Trump Administration to trample on women’s access to basic reproductive care. It’s 2019, yet the Trump Administration is still trying to roll back women’s rights. Our coalition will continue to fight to ensure women have access to the reproductive healthcare they are guaranteed under the law.”
Substantial Number of Women Losing Birth Control Coverage
The U.S. Department of Justice said in court documents the rules “protect a narrow class of sincere religious and moral objectors from being forced to facilitate practices that conflict with their beliefs.”
At issue is a requirement under President Barack Obama’s health care law that birth control services be covered at no additional cost. Obama officials included exemptions for religious organizations. The Trump administration expanded those exemptions and added “moral convictions” as a basis to opt out of providing birth control services.
At a hearing on Friday, Gilliam said the changes would result in a “substantial number” of women losing birth control coverage, which would be a “massive policy shift.”
The judge previously blocked an interim version of the rules — a decision that was upheld in December by an appeals court.
The ruling affects California, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, Minnesota, New York, North Carolina, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, and the District of Columbia.
Dollar Doubts Dominate Gathering of Global Economic Leaders
18 hours ago
Shedeur Sanders’ Long Wait Ends When Browns Take Him in the 5th Round of the NFL Draft
19 hours ago
Only About Half of Republicans Say Trump Has Focused on the Right Priorities
22 hours ago
Shedeur Sanders Is Still Waiting for a Call as the NFL Draft Enters the Final Day
22 hours ago
Paul Skenes Strikes Out 9, Wins Duel With Yamamoto in Pirates’ Victory Over Dodgers
23 hours ago
Eovaldi Outlasts Verlander as Rangers Beat Giants
23 hours ago
Will California Meet Newsom’s 2035 EV Deadline? It Won’t Even Hit the 2026 Target
2 hours ago
Categories

Will California Meet Newsom’s 2035 EV Deadline? It Won’t Even Hit the 2026 Target

Is It Bad to Chew Gum All Day?

Dollar Doubts Dominate Gathering of Global Economic Leaders

Shedeur Sanders’ Long Wait Ends When Browns Take Him in the 5th Round of the NFL Draft

Only About Half of Republicans Say Trump Has Focused on the Right Priorities

Wired Wednesday: What’s the Future of Fresno Unified and the Superintendent Position?

Zakaria Draws Parallels Between Trump’s Tariffs, Failed 1930s Economic Policies
