Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
Justices Won’t Hear States’ Appeal Over Planned Parenthood
By admin
Published 7 years ago on
December 10, 2018

Share

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Monday avoided a high-profile case by rejecting appeals from Kansas and Louisiana in their effort to strip Medicaid money from Planned Parenthood, over the dissenting votes of three justices.
The court’s order reflected a split among its conservative justices and an accusation from Justice Clarence Thomas that his colleagues seemed to be ducking the case for political reasons. New Justice Brett Kavanaugh was among the justices who opted not to hear the case.
The two states were appealing lower court rulings that had blocked them from withholding money that is used for health services for low-income women. The money is not used for abortions. Abortion opponents have said Planned Parenthood should not receive any government money because of heavily edited videos that claimed to show the nation’s largest abortion provider profiting from sales of fetal tissue for medical research.
Investigations sparked by the videos in several states didn’t result in criminal charges.

Dispute at the High Court Has Nothing to Do With Abortion

The dispute at the high court has nothing to do with abortion, as Thomas pointed out in a dissent that was joined by Justices Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch. Kavanaugh’s decision not to join the three justices was his first discernible vote on the court. Had he or Chief Justice John Roberts voted to hear the case, there would have been the four votes necessary to set the case for arguments.

“So what explains the court’s refusal to do its job here? I suspect it has something to do with the fact that some respondents in these cases are named ‘Planned Parenthood.’ That makes the Court’s decision particularly troubling, as the question presented has nothing to do with abortion.” — Justice Clarence Thomas 
The issue is who has the right to challenge a state’s Medicaid funding decisions, private individuals or only the federal government. The states say that the Medicaid program, a joint venture of federal and state governments to provide health care to poorer Americans, makes clear that only the Secretary of Health and Human Services can intervene, by withholding money from a state.
Most lower federal courts have found that private parties can challenge Medicaid funding decisions in court, although the federal appeals court in St. Louis rejected a similar court challenge and allowed Arkansas to end its contract with Planned Parenthood. A split among federal appeals courts is often a reason for the Supreme Court to step in.
“So what explains the court’s refusal to do its job here? I suspect it has something to do with the fact that some respondents in these cases are named ‘Planned Parenthood.’ That makes the Court’s decision particularly troubling, as the question presented has nothing to do with abortion,” Thomas wrote.

Dispute Over Funding for Planned Parenthood

The dispute over funding for Planned Parenthood stemmed from the July 2015 release by the anti-abortion group Center for Medical Progress of a series of edited videos purportedly depicting Planned Parenthood of America executives talking about the sale of fetal tissue. Planned Parenthood has said it did not seek any payments beyond legally permitted reimbursement of costs.
Catherine Glenn Foster, president and CEO of the anti-abortion Americans United for Life, said the court should have heard the case. “But the good news is that there are other similar cases pending in lower courts, which may give the Supreme Court another opportunity to decide this important issue. In the meantime, AUL will continue to fight to protect states from being forced to use their limited public funds to subsidize abortion businesses,” Foster said.
Planned Parenthood president Dr. Leana Wen praised the decision to leave the lower court rulings in place. “As a doctor, I have seen what’s at stake when people cannot access the care they need, and when politics gets in the way of people making their own health care choices. We won’t stop fighting for every patient who relies on Planned Parenthood for life-saving, life-changing care,” Wen said.

DON'T MISS

What Are Fresno Real Estate Experts Predicting for 2025 and Beyond?

UP NEXT

US House Passes Trump Cuts of $9.4 Billion for Foreign Aid, Broadcasting

The Best Songs of 2025, So Far

2 hours ago

A Starter Pack for Aspiring Wine Lovers

3 hours ago

Protests, Parades and Pride: One Week in June 2025 Is Drawing Stark American Fault Lines

WASHINGTON — On the first weekend: a vision of the nation built upon inclusivity and the tenets of liberalism — a conception of country that...

36 minutes ago

36 minutes ago

Protests, Parades and Pride: One Week in June 2025 Is Drawing Stark American Fault Lines

44 minutes ago

Former State House Speaker, Husband Killed in Politically Targeted Shooting

1 hour ago

The Latest: Israel Threatens More Attacks on Iran After Tehran Retaliates With Missile Strikes

2 hours ago

The Best Songs of 2025, So Far

3 hours ago

A Starter Pack for Aspiring Wine Lovers

3 hours ago

Does Merced County Need an Independent Commission to Draw Board of Supervisors Districts?

4 hours ago

Israel Had the Courage to Do What Needed to Be Done

4 hours ago

Fresno Arts Council Debuts Gallery on Fulton for July ArtHop

Help continue the work that gets you the news that matters most.

Search

Send this to a friend