California’s Progressive War on Suburbia
By Opinion
Published 4 years ago on
February 21, 2020
Share
[aggregation-styles]
California Globe
For three years in a row, California’s progressive lawmakers have attempted to legislate higher density housing by taking away the ability of cities and counties to enforce local zoning laws. And for the third year in a row, the proposed law, Senate Bill 50, was narrowly defeated. But eventually, inevitably, something like SB 50 is going to passed into law.
In opposition were homeowners who understandably don’t want their single family home neighborhoods subjected to random demolitions in order to replace single family homes with construction subsidized fourplexes to be filled with rent subsidized tenants. These homeowners, and the local elected officials who represent them, were joined by “housing justice advocates” who claimed the law didn’t adequately address the gentrification effect, whereby higher density developments often displace existing residents to construct luxury condominiums that only the wealthy can afford.
There’s a lot going on here, and it seems that very little in the way of analysis can support a dogmatic ideological perspective. For example, from a property rights perspective, you can argue that people who purchase homes have a right to expect the zoning density of the neighborhood to be respected, since that’s what they relied on when they invested their life savings and lifetime earnings. But a property rights perspective might also have one argue that each individual home owner has the right to do whatever they wish with their property, even if that means demolishing the home to construct a multi-story apartment building. These unresolved and conflicting interpretations of property rights prevent consensus and delay action.
Read More →
California Globe
For three years in a row, California’s progressive lawmakers have attempted to legislate higher density housing by taking away the ability of cities and counties to enforce local zoning laws. And for the third year in a row, the proposed law, Senate Bill 50, was narrowly defeated. But eventually, inevitably, something like SB 50 is going to passed into law.
In opposition were homeowners who understandably don’t want their single family home neighborhoods subjected to random demolitions in order to replace single family homes with construction subsidized fourplexes to be filled with rent subsidized tenants. These homeowners, and the local elected officials who represent them, were joined by “housing justice advocates” who claimed the law didn’t adequately address the gentrification effect, whereby higher density developments often displace existing residents to construct luxury condominiums that only the wealthy can afford.
There’s a lot going on here, and it seems that very little in the way of analysis can support a dogmatic ideological perspective. For example, from a property rights perspective, you can argue that people who purchase homes have a right to expect the zoning density of the neighborhood to be respected, since that’s what they relied on when they invested their life savings and lifetime earnings. But a property rights perspective might also have one argue that each individual home owner has the right to do whatever they wish with their property, even if that means demolishing the home to construct a multi-story apartment building. These unresolved and conflicting interpretations of property rights prevent consensus and delay action.
Read More →
By Edward Ring | 21 Feb 2020
RELATED TOPICS:
After Losing Population in Recent Years, California Grows Again. Is That a Good Thing?
Opinion /
9 hours ago
Yellen Says Threats to Democracy Risk US Economic Growth, an Indirect Jab at Trump
Politics /
1 day ago
New Sea Route for Gaza Aid on Track. Treating Starving Children Is a Priority
World /
1 day ago
At Time of Rising Antisemitism, Holocaust Survivors Take on Denial and Hate in New Digital Campaign
Inspire /
1 day ago
Gov. Newsom Appoints Judges for Fresno, Merced Counties
Local /
2 days ago
Israel Briefs US on Evacuation Plan for Palestinians Ahead of Planned Rafah Assault
World /
2 days ago
Israel Orders Al Jazeera to Close Its Local Operation, Seizes Some Equipment
TEL AVIV, Israel — Israel ordered the local offices of Qatar’s Al Jazeera satellite news network to close Sunday, escalating a long-ru...
World /
4 hours ago
Categories
Latest
Videos
World /
4 hours ago
Israel Orders Al Jazeera to Close Its Local Operation, Seizes Some Equipment
World /
4 hours ago
Israel Vows Military Operation ‘in the Very Near Future’ After Latest Hamas Attack
Opinion /
9 hours ago
After Losing Population in Recent Years, California Grows Again. Is That a Good Thing?
Politics /
1 day ago
Yellen Says Threats to Democracy Risk US Economic Growth, an Indirect Jab at Trump
World /
1 day ago