Gov. Kathy Hochul of New York responds to questions from Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-N.Y.) during a hearing of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform on state immigration policies on Capitol Hill in Washington, on Thursday, June 12, 2025. (Kenny Holston/The New York Times)

- House Republicans grill Democratic governors on immigration amid protests and troop deployment, escalating tensions over sanctuary laws and enforcement limits.
- GOP-led hearing targets Walz, Pritzker, and Hochul’s immigration stances as Trump pushes federal crackdown and criticizes sanctuary policies.
- Democratic governors defend state laws as House Republicans cite Los Angeles unrest to attack immigration protections and demand federal compliance.
Share
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
WASHINGTON — Congressional Republicans are set on Thursday to question three Democratic governors about their states’ immigration policies, amplifying a partisan clash as President Donald Trump continues a showdown with California officials and anti-deportation protests spread across the country.
The three governors — Tim Walz of Minnesota, JB Pritzker of Illinois and Kathy Hochul of New York — were called to testify before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform long before the unrest in Los Angeles, which began last week with protests over workplace raids and escalated after Trump sent Marines and National Guard troops to the city.
But House Republicans are all but certain to point to the scenes of violent clashes in California and elsewhere as they seek to vilify Democratic officials over immigration policies that Trump and his allies in Congress claim shield criminals.
Democrats Remain Divided Over Immigration Enforcement
Democrats have remained divided over their party’s stance on immigration enforcement; some recent polls have shown them to be politically vulnerable on the issue compared to Republicans. But they are united in their efforts to cast Trump’s large-scale immigration crackdown and deployment of troops as an abuse of presidential power and a violation of the Constitution.
Thursday’s hearing reflects a larger Republican effort to harness voters’ anxieties over immigration and crime for political gains. Trump during his campaign last year broadly depicted immigrants who are in the country illegally as violent and dangerous, blaming Democrats for encouraging a “migrant crime wave” that was contradicted by statistics.
This year, the president issued executive orders targeting so-called sanctuary cities, jurisdictions that limit their cooperation with federal immigration authorities or have policies explicitly intended to protect immigrants living in the country without permanent legal status against detention or deportation. One order directs the withholding of federal funds from cities and counties that do not cooperate with federal immigration enforcement efforts.
Republicans in Congress also have advanced bills that have taken aim at those states and localities. And Rep. James Comer, R-Ky., the chair of the oversight panel, has promised to use the committee’s investigatory powers to explore the effects of sanctuary laws.
The committee, the House’s principal investigative panel, is one of its most confrontational, stacked with vocal ideologues. The tense and sometimes theatrical hearings often reemerge as viral moments delivered to supporters on social media.
Comer’s summoning of the three Democratic governors seems designed to generate maximum political impact, even if they can avoid a gaffe. Walz, who is weighing a reelection campaign, was the Democratic vice-presidential nominee last year and one of his party’s highest-profile representatives fighting Trump. Both he and Pritzker, who has called on Democrats to adopt a more unflinching, aggressive approach to Trump, are among those floated as potential 2028 presidential contenders.
Hochul has sought to strike a more moderate posture. After initially clashing with Trump over congestion pricing, the brash president and unassuming governor have built something of a rapport. In just the past month, Trump reversed course to approve a wind farm crucial to the state’s climate goals, and Hochul signaled openness to a new gas pipeline that the president has pushed for.
But the relationship remains a high-wire act for Hochul, who is seeking reelection next year. Two House Republicans, Reps. Mike Lawler and Elise Stefanik, are weighing running against her, and both have criticized Hochul’s stance on immigration for years. Hochul has defended New York’s immigration laws, which prohibit arrests in state buildings and require agents to seek judicial warrants before detaining residents.
Even so, it could be difficult for House Republicans to portray her as an open-borders radical. A centrist from Buffalo, Hochul garnered some of the first headlines of her career back in 2007, when as a county clerk she refused to provide driver’s licenses to immigrants living in the country without permanent legal status. And while her stance has evolved on the issue — her prepared testimony for the committee includes a line on the importance of everyone being able to obtain a license — she has remained, rhetorically at least, more open to working with federal immigration officials than other Democrats in her state.
“Someone breaks the law, I’ll be the first one to call up ICE and say, ‘Get them out of here,’” she told reporters late last year.
Even so, in her prepared testimony, which was obtained by The New York Times, she invoked New York’s storied history as a city of immigrants and her family’s migration from Ireland to put forward her own vision for immigration reform, prioritizing work authorization.
“Let them work; let them contribute,” she wrote. “Let them chase the American dream — just like my grandparents, and many of yours.”
Pritzker has sought to turn Illinois into a “firewall” against Trump’s deportation efforts, signing some of the nation’s most robust legislation in defiance of federal immigration enforcement. Where New York law only restricts officials from sharing information with federal agents, giving localities some discretion, Illinois forbids local authorities from engaging with immigration enforcement actions.
In his written testimony to the oversight committee, Pritzker blamed federal inaction by Democrats and Republicans for an influx of migrants into his state. He also implicated former President Joe Biden, saying, “the federal government’s lack of intervention and coordination at the border exacerbated the crisis.”
—
This article originally appeared in The New York Times.
By Michael Gold and Grace Ashford/Kenny Holston
c. 2025 The New York Times Company
RELATED TOPICS:
Oil Dips Ahead of Expected OPEC+ Output Increase
14 hours ago
613 Killed at Gaza Aid Distribution Sites, Near Humanitarian Covoys, Says UN
14 hours ago
Fresno County Authorities Investigating Suspicious Death of Transient Man
15 hours ago
Israeli Military Kills 20 in Gaza as Trump Awaits Hamas Reply to Truce Proposal
15 hours ago
Valley Crime Stoppers’ Most Wanted Person of the Day: Rachelle Maria Blanco
15 hours ago
Russia Pounds Kyiv With Largest Drone Attack, Hours After Trump-Putin Call
15 hours ago
Markets’ 90-Day Tariff Pause Rollercoaster Nears an Uncertain End
15 hours ago
Trump to Sign Tax-Cut and Spending Bill in July 4 Ceremony
13 hours ago
Categories

Trump to Sign Tax-Cut and Spending Bill in July 4 Ceremony

Clovis, Sanger, Madera, and Bass Lake Will Light the Sky With Fireworks Shows Tonight

Oil Dips Ahead of Expected OPEC+ Output Increase

613 Killed at Gaza Aid Distribution Sites, Near Humanitarian Covoys, Says UN

Fresno County Authorities Investigating Suspicious Death of Transient Man

Israeli Military Kills 20 in Gaza as Trump Awaits Hamas Reply to Truce Proposal
