Members of the California National Guard stand guard outside of the Metropolitan Detention Center in Los Angeles, on Tuesday, June 10, 2025. After a night of small and mostly peaceful protests in Los Angeles, the Marines deployed by the Trump administration arrived in the area on Tuesday. (Alex Welsh/The New York Times)

- Military leaders testify Monday in court that the LA protests generated little danger to federal property and employees.
- Trump administration officials say violence from the protests justified the deployment of troops there.
- State of California lawsuit seeks a declaration that Trump's action was illegal.
Share
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
Troops were used to protect federal property and personnel in Los Angeles in recent months even though intelligence assessments showed little danger, two military officials testified on Monday at a landmark trial over President Donald Trump’s authority to use soldiers to police American streets.
The three-day non-jury trial before San Francisco-based U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer will determine whether the government violated a 19th-century law that bars the military from civil law enforcement when Trump deployed the troops in June, as the state of California claims in its legal challenge.
Los Angeles experienced days of unrest and protests sparked by mass immigration raids at places where people gather to find work, like Home Depot stores, a garment factory and a warehouse.
Republican president Trump ordered 700 Marines and 4,000 National Guard troops to Los Angeles in June, against the wishes of its Democratic governor Gavin Newsom.
The administration denies that troops were used in civil law enforcement and plans to show that they were protecting federal property and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents.
The trial kicked off hours after Trump said he was taking the extraordinary step of deploying National Guard troops to fight crime in Washington and suggested he could take similar measures in other U.S. cities.
Testimony of Army Major General Scott Sherman
Much of Monday’s testimony came from U.S. Army Major General Scott Sherman, who until recently commanded the military operations in Los Angeles.
Under questioning from a lawyer for California, he testified about an internal military intelligence assessment that concluded there would be little risk to federal property and personnel during a July 7 immigration enforcement operation at a Los Angeles park.
Sherman said a DHS official criticized him and questioned his loyalty to the country after he denied an initial request for military assistance for the operation. A different request for assistance was later approved by U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, Sherman said.
Later during Sherman’s testimony, Judge Breyer asked the general whether the military can deploy troops to incidents even if it has determined there is low risk to federal property or personnel.
“If it is not seen as a situation in which there is a threat, then is it your testimony you can still deploy the military because there may be a threat in carrying out the operation?” Breyer asked.
“That’s correct, Your Honor,” Sherman said.
Trump Administration Witnesses
The Trump administration’s witnesses also described more chaotic situations in which protesters threw Molotov cocktails and damaged federal buildings, justifying the initial use of the military to protect government property.
Many of the troops have been withdrawn from Los Angeles, but California’s Attorney General Rob Bonta said on Monday that 300 National Guard members are still going on immigration raids and restricting civilian movements in the state.
The Trump administration last week extended the activation of troops in the Los Angeles area through November 6, according to a court filing by Newsom.
“The federal government deployed military troops to the streets of Los Angeles for the purposes of political theater and public intimidation,” Bonta said in a statement. “This dangerous move has no precedent in American history.”
California and Newsom, a prominent Democrat, have asked Breyer to prohibit the troops from directly participating in domestic law enforcement activities.
They say the National Guard is accompanying ICE agents on raids and assisting in arrests, in violation of the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878 and other laws that forbid the U.S. military from taking part in civilian law enforcement.
California’s lawsuit ultimately seeks a ruling that would return its National Guard troops to state control and a declaration that Trump’s action was illegal.
— —
(Reporting by Dietrich Knauth and Jack Queen in New York and Jan Wolfe in Washington; Editing by Tom Hals, Tom Hogue, Will Dunham, Andrea Ricci and Nia Williams)
RELATED TOPICS:
What Deal Might Emerge From Trump-Putin Summit and Could It Hold?
45 minutes ago
Madera County Authorities Seek Family of Deceased Coarsegold Man
2 hours ago
Fresno Police Plan DUI Checkpoints, Increased Patrols Throughout August
2 hours ago
Valley Crime Stoppers’ Most Wanted Person of the Day: Twanisha Madonna Lee
2 hours ago
Trump Administration Says George Washington University Violated Law Over Jewish Students, Faculty
3 hours ago
US Court Says Trump’s DOGE Team Can Access Sensitive Data
3 hours ago
The Trump Administration Tried to Silence Mahmoud Khalil, So I Asked Him to Talk
3 hours ago
AI Startup Perplexity Makes Bold $34.5 Billion Bid for Google’s Chrome Browser
27 minutes ago
Categories

AI Startup Perplexity Makes Bold $34.5 Billion Bid for Google’s Chrome Browser

Newsom’s Congressional Redistricting Drive in California Faces Tall Hurdles

Democrat Sherrod Brown to Seek a Return to US Senate in 2026 Election, Media Reports Say

What Deal Might Emerge From Trump-Putin Summit and Could It Hold?

Madera County Authorities Seek Family of Deceased Coarsegold Man
