US agency rules Amazon liable for hazardous third-party products, ordering recalls and customer notifications. (AP File)

- CPSC unanimously labels Amazon as a "distributor" of faulty items sold and shipped through its platform.
- Amazon plans to appeal the decision, having fought the "distributor" label since being sued in 2021.
- Agency criticizes Amazon's response to deficient products, citing inadequate steps to encourage returns or destruction.
Share
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
SOUTH GATE — Amazon is responsible under federal safety law for hazardous products sold on its platform by third-party sellers and shipped by the company, a U.S. government agency ordered Tuesday.
In a unanimous vote, the Consumer Product Safety Commission said it determined that the e-commerce company was a “distributor” of faulty items sold on its site and packed and shipped through its fulfillment service.
That means the company is on the hook, legally, for the recalls of more than 400,000 products, including hairdryers and defective carbon monoxide detectors, the agency said. It ordered Amazon to come up with a system for notifying customers who purchased faulty items and to remove the products from circulation by offering incentives for their return or destruction.
Amazon said it planned to appeal the decision in court.
Related Story: California Fines Amazon Nearly $6M, Alleging Illegal Work Quotas at 2
Amazon’s Dominant Market Share
Overall, Amazon accounts for roughly 40% of e-commerce sales in the U.S., according to the market research firm Emarketer. The company sells many items directly to consumers and also partners with nearly 2 million third-party sellers, who drive the majority of the sales on the platform.
The online retailer has fought the “distributor” label since 2021, when it was sued by the Consumer Product Safety Commission for allegedly distributing hazardous items.
Related Story: Amazon Joins Exclusive Club, Crossing $2 Trillion in Stock Market Value for the ...
Amazon’s Response to Deficient Products
When Amazon was notified about the deficient products three years ago, the company “swiftly” notified customers, told them to stop using the items and issued refunds, Amazon spokesperson Tim Doyle said.
But the agency said the company “did not take adequate steps to encourage” customers to return or destroy the products, leaving them at risk of injury. In the messages it sent, the company claimed the faulty products had “potential” safety issues and provided customers with Amazon.com credits rather than refunds, the agency said.
Related Story: Amazon Labor Union Workers Vote Overwhelmingly in Favor of an Affiliation with ...
Amazon had argued before an administrative law judge and the five-person commission that it shouldn’t be classified as a distributor under the Consumer Product Safety Act. The commission said the judge rejected the company’s argument, and Tuesday’s order was an affirmation of that decision.
RELATED TOPICS:
Dollar Doubts Dominate Gathering of Global Economic Leaders
18 hours ago
Shedeur Sanders’ Long Wait Ends When Browns Take Him in the 5th Round of the NFL Draft
19 hours ago
Only About Half of Republicans Say Trump Has Focused on the Right Priorities
22 hours ago
Shedeur Sanders Is Still Waiting for a Call as the NFL Draft Enters the Final Day
22 hours ago
Paul Skenes Strikes Out 9, Wins Duel With Yamamoto in Pirates’ Victory Over Dodgers
23 hours ago
Eovaldi Outlasts Verlander as Rangers Beat Giants
23 hours ago
Will California Meet Newsom’s 2035 EV Deadline? It Won’t Even Hit the 2026 Target
2 hours ago
Categories

Will California Meet Newsom’s 2035 EV Deadline? It Won’t Even Hit the 2026 Target

Is It Bad to Chew Gum All Day?

Dollar Doubts Dominate Gathering of Global Economic Leaders

Shedeur Sanders’ Long Wait Ends When Browns Take Him in the 5th Round of the NFL Draft

Only About Half of Republicans Say Trump Has Focused on the Right Priorities

Wired Wednesday: What’s the Future of Fresno Unified and the Superintendent Position?

Zakaria Draws Parallels Between Trump’s Tariffs, Failed 1930s Economic Policies
