California anti-tax groups qualify a November ballot measure to stiffen state and local tax increase procedures, culminating a nearly 50-year conflict. (Shutterstock)

- Californians pay roughly a trillion dollars in federal, state, and local taxes annually.
- California's high-tax status sets the stage for a multi-front war over taxation this year.
- Three statewide ballot measures could dramatically alter the politics of taxation in California.
Share
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
Californians will be coughing up many billions of dollars this month as they file their federal and state income tax returns and pay the second installment on their property taxes.

Dan Walters
CalMatters
Opinion
How much? Annually, individual Californians and California-based businesses pay roughly a half-trillion dollars in federal taxes — personal income taxes, Social Security and Medicare payroll taxes, primarily. They also pay at least another half-trillion dollars to state and local governments — personal income taxes, sales taxes and property taxes, primarily.
By any measure, California is a high-tax state.
The Tax Foundation, a Washington-based organization that tracks nationwide tax trends, recently reported that California’s state government levies the nation’s highest taxes per capita at $7,200, which translates into about $280 billion a year. As a portion of California’s $4 trillion economy, its $540 billion in state and local taxes rank fifth highest at 13.5%.
These numbers — and the state’s multibillion-dollar budget deficit — set the stage for a monumental, multi-front war over taxation this year, including three statewide ballot measures that could dramatically alter the politics of taxation.
The Democratic Party’s progressive wing, strongly backed by public employee unions, contends that new taxes are needed to maintain vital welfare, education and healthcare services. However, Gov. Gavin Newsom has publicly rejected tax hikes and proposes a budget that closes the deficit, at least on paper, with spending deferrals, bookkeeping maneuvers, loans and an injection of money from the state’s rainy day reserves.
Two years ago, California’s two most authoritative polling organizations, UC Berkeley’s Institute of Governmental Studies and the Public Policy Institute of California, asked residents about their tax burdens and both found increasing discontent, in part because they were feeling the pinch of other costs of living.
The polling punctuated voters’ rejection of a tax increase measure on the 2020 ballot that would have changed Proposition 13, the iconic property tax limit approved by voters in 1978, by increasing taxes on commercial property.

Related Story: California Homelessness: $24 Billion Spent, Little to Show for It
Two-Thirds Requirement for Taxes?
Hoping to leverage popular resistance to tax increases, business and anti-tax groups led by the California Business Roundtable have qualified a measure for the November ballot that would make raising state and local taxes much more difficult.
If passed, the measure would require two-thirds votes for any local tax increases, effectively overturning a state Supreme Court ruling that local taxes proposed via initiative require only simple majority votes. It also would subject any state tax increases to voter approval as well as two-thirds votes by the Legislature.
The measure’s qualification has touched off a legal and political war with Newsom, the Legislature and pro-tax interests, such as unions. Newsom and the Legislature have filed suit, hoping to persuade the state Supreme Court that the measure is a constitutional revision, rather than an amendment, and thereby cannot be enacted by initiative.
The contending interests have filed written arguments with the court, which has not formally decided whether to accept the case. If it does, it will have only a few months to declare whether or not the measure goes on the ballot.
The Legislature has also placed its own measure on the ballot that, if passed, would require the business tax limit measure itself to get two-thirds voter approval. And it passed another ballot measure to reduce vote margin for local tax and bond measures that increase spending on housing and infrastructure to 55% from the current two-thirds, potentially nullifying the Business Roundtable measure.
It’s a showdown that’s been building for nearly five decades, ever since Prop. 13 won approval. With countless billions of dollars at stake, hundreds of millions of dollars are likely to be spent for and against the three interrelated measures.
About the Author
Dan Walters has been a journalist for nearly 60 years, spending all but a few of those years working for California newspapers. He began his professional career in 1960, at age 16, at the Humboldt Times. CalMatters is a public interest journalism venture committed to explaining how California’s state Capitol works and why it matters. For more columns by Dan Walters, go to calmatters.org/commentary.
Make Your Voice Heard
GV Wire encourages vigorous debate from people and organizations on local, state, and national issues. Submit your op-ed to bmcewen@gvwire.com for consideration.
RELATED TOPICS:
US-Houthi Ceasefire Deal Does Not Include Israel, Says Houthi Spokesperson
7 hours ago
Iran’s Leader Hopes America Can Save His Faltering Regime
8 hours ago
Syria Has Had Indirect Talks With Israel to Calm Situation, Syrian Leader Says
9 hours ago
Finding New Uses for Farmland in the Heart of Ag Country Is a Daunting Task
10 hours ago
Black Smoke Signals No Pope Elected at First Conclave Vote
10 hours ago
Tulare Murder Case Ends With Woman Sentenced to Life
10 hours ago
Housing Component Halted, but Fresno’s Senior Center Is Moving Forward
10 hours ago

State Center Trustees Turn Deaf Ear to Backers of Downtown Student Housing

Valley Crime Stoppers’ Most Wanted Person of the Day: Douglas Kindle

US-Houthi Ceasefire Deal Does Not Include Israel, Says Houthi Spokesperson

Iran’s Leader Hopes America Can Save His Faltering Regime

Syria Has Had Indirect Talks With Israel to Calm Situation, Syrian Leader Says

Finding New Uses for Farmland in the Heart of Ag Country Is a Daunting Task
