Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
Amazon Sued by FTC and 17 States Over Allegations It Inflates Online Prices and Overcharges Sellers
gvw_ap_news
By Associated Press
Published 1 year ago on
September 26, 2023

Share

U.S. regulators and 17 states are suing Amazon over allegations the e-commerce behemoth abuses its position in the marketplace to inflate prices on and off its platform, overcharge sellers and stifle competition.

The lawsuit, filed Tuesday in federal court in Amazon’s home state of Washington, is the result of a yearslong investigation into the company’s businesses and one of the most significant legal challenges brought against it in its nearly 30-year history.

The Allegations

The Federal Trade Commission and states that joined the lawsuit allege Amazon is violating federal and state antitrust laws. They are asking the court to issue a permanent injunction that they say would prohibit Amazon from engaging in its unlawful conduct and loosen its “monopolistic control to restore competition.”

The complaint accuses the company of engaging in anti-competitive practices through measures that deter sellers from offering lower prices for products on non-Amazon sites, an argument mirroring allegations made in a separate lawsuit filed last year by the state of California.

The lawsuit says Amazon buries listings offered at lower prices on other sites. At the same time, it also charges sellers high fees, forcing merchants to raise their prices on the platform, as well as on other e-commerce sites in order to keep their products competitive on Amazon.

Amazon’s Response

Seattle-based Amazon.com Inc. said the FTC is “wrong on the facts and the law” and had departed from its role of protecting consumers and competition.

“If the FTC gets its way, the result would be fewer products to choose from, higher prices, slower deliveries for consumers, and reduced options for small businesses — the opposite of what antitrust law is designed to do,” Amazon General Counsel David Zapolsky said in a prepared statement.

Further Accusations

The lawsuit also accuses Amazon of degrading customers’ experience by replacing relevant search results with paid advertisements, favoring its own brands over other products it knows to be of better quality, and charging heavy fees that force sellers to pay nearly half of their total revenues to Amazon. According to the anti-monopoly organization Institute for Local Self-Reliance, the cut sellers give to Amazon from their revenue is up from 35% in 2020 and 19% in 2014.

The lawsuit also says Amazon compels sellers to use its logistics service, Fulfillment by Amazon, in order to make their products eligible for Amazon Prime, even though many of them would rather use alternative fulfillment services to get orders to customers.

Amazon’s Market Control

Some estimates show Amazon controls about 40% of the e-commerce market. A majority of the sales on its platform are facilitated by independent sellers consisting of small- and medium-sized businesses and individuals. In return for the access it provides to its platform, Amazon rakes in billions through referral fees and other services like advertising, which makes products sold by sellers more visible on the platform.

The vast majority of third-party merchants also use the company’s fulfillment service to store inventory and ship items to customers. Amazon has been consistently raising fees for those reliant on the program and more recently imposed — and then abandoned — another fee on some who don’t, a move that was blasted by the company’s critics. Last quarter, Amazon reported $32.3 billion in revenue from third-party services.

Industry Reaction

Consumer advocacy groups applauded the lawsuit, while an industry group said many large retail businesses have policies that mirror Amazon’s.

There has been speculation the agency would seek to a forced breakup of the retail giant, which is also dominant in cloud computing and has a growing presence in other sectors, like groceries and health care. In a briefing with reporters, Khan dodged questions of whether that will happen.

“At this stage, the focus is more on liability,” she said.

Previous Allegations

Amazon has long faced allegations of undercutting businesses that sell on its platform by assessing merchant data and creating its own competing products that it then boosts on its site. In August, the company said it was eliminating some in-house brands that weren’t resonating with customers and would relaunch some items under existing brands like Amazon Basics and Amazon Essentials. Booksellers and authors have also been urging the Department of Justice to investigate what they’ve called Amazon’s “monopoly power over the market for books and ideas.”

If successful, a court case could be a big boost for the FTC’s Khan, a Big Tech critic who gained prominence as a Yale law student in 2017 for her scholarly work “Amazon’s Antitrust Paradox.” In 2021, Amazon had sought to get her recused from agency probes against the company because of her earlier criticism.

Under Khan’s watch, the FTC has aggressively attempted to blunt Big Tech’s influence but has been unsuccessful recently in some of the most high-profile cases, including its bid to block Microsoft’s takeover of the video game maker Activision Blizzard and Meta’s acquisition of the virtual reality startup Within Unlimited. The agency is now in the middle of a protracted lawsuit against Facebook parent Meta, which it alleges to have engaged in monopolistic behavior. The Justice Department is also challenging Google’s market power in court.

In addition to the lawsuit in California, the District of Columbia has also sued Amazon over its treatment of third-party sellers. That lawsuit was thrown out by a federal judge earlier last year and is currently under appeal.

The federal complaint follows other actions the FTC has taken against Amazon in the past few months. In June, the agency sued the company, alleging it was using deceptive practices to enroll consumers into Amazon Prime and making it challenging for them to cancel their subscriptions. Amazon disputes the allegations.

In late May, the company agreed to pay a $25 million civil penalty to settle allegations that it violated a child privacy law and misled parents about data deletion practices on its popular voice assistant Alexa.

RELATED TOPICS:

DON'T MISS

Dodgers Reward Manager With 4-Year Contract Extension That Runs Through 2029

DON'T MISS

Deals for QBs and Pass Rushers Highlight Start of NFL Free Agency

DON'T MISS

Janz Reveals Treasurer of Group Behind Attack Mailer, Issues $1K Sanction

DON'T MISS

Court Asked to Intervene After Email Tells USAID Workers to Destroy Classified Docs

DON'T MISS

House Passes Funding Bill Until September, Senate Outcome Uncertain

DON'T MISS

Education Dept. Plans to Lay Off 1,300 Employees as Trump Vows to Wind the Agency Down

DON'T MISS

President Trump’s Many Golf Trips Are Costing Taxpayers Millions Per Outing

DON'T MISS

Dogs Suspected of Killing Cats and Terrorizing Fresno-Clovis Are Captured

DON'T MISS

Billy Gunn Not the One as AEW Hits Fresno on Wednesday

DON'T MISS

2 Judges, Appointed by Republicans, Speak Out About Threats Against Federal Judiciary

UP NEXT

California Almond Growers Grapple With Uncertainty as New Tariffs Could Hit Exports

UP NEXT

California Lawmakers Propose Fixes for ‘Insurance Industry in Shambles’

UP NEXT

Southwest Airlines No Longer Will Let Checked Bags Fly for Free

UP NEXT

Stock Market Today: Wall Street Sinks More After Trump Ups the Ante in His Trade War

UP NEXT

Trump Says He’ll Buy a Tesla to Show Support for Musk

UP NEXT

Trump Has Begun Another Trade War. Here’s a Timeline of How We Got Here

UP NEXT

Trump Fertilizer Tariff Exemption Comes as Farmers Prep for Season

UP NEXT

Which US Companies Are Pulling Back on Diversity Initiatives?

UP NEXT

Powell: Federal Reserve to Stay on Hold Amid Widespread Economic Uncertainty

UP NEXT

US Employers Add a Solid 151,000 Jobs Last Month Though Unemployment Up to 4.1%

Court Asked to Intervene After Email Tells USAID Workers to Destroy Classified Docs

5 hours ago

House Passes Funding Bill Until September, Senate Outcome Uncertain

5 hours ago

Education Dept. Plans to Lay Off 1,300 Employees as Trump Vows to Wind the Agency Down

6 hours ago

President Trump’s Many Golf Trips Are Costing Taxpayers Millions Per Outing

6 hours ago

Dogs Suspected of Killing Cats and Terrorizing Fresno-Clovis Are Captured

6 hours ago

Billy Gunn Not the One as AEW Hits Fresno on Wednesday

6 hours ago

2 Judges, Appointed by Republicans, Speak Out About Threats Against Federal Judiciary

7 hours ago

Lake Superior Shipwreck From 1892 Finally Discovered

7 hours ago

US-Ukraine Deal Highlights Ukraine’s Wealth of Critical Minerals

7 hours ago

Tiger Woods Ruptured His Achilles Tendon, Likely Causing Him to Miss the Masters

8 hours ago

Dodgers Reward Manager With 4-Year Contract Extension That Runs Through 2029

GLENDALE, Ariz. — Dave Roberts has a signed a four-year contract extension to manage the defending World Series champion Los Angeles Dodgers...

4 hours ago

4 hours ago

Dodgers Reward Manager With 4-Year Contract Extension That Runs Through 2029

5 hours ago

Deals for QBs and Pass Rushers Highlight Start of NFL Free Agency

5 hours ago

Janz Reveals Treasurer of Group Behind Attack Mailer, Issues $1K Sanction

5 hours ago

Court Asked to Intervene After Email Tells USAID Workers to Destroy Classified Docs

5 hours ago

House Passes Funding Bill Until September, Senate Outcome Uncertain

6 hours ago

Education Dept. Plans to Lay Off 1,300 Employees as Trump Vows to Wind the Agency Down

6 hours ago

President Trump’s Many Golf Trips Are Costing Taxpayers Millions Per Outing

6 hours ago

Dogs Suspected of Killing Cats and Terrorizing Fresno-Clovis Are Captured

Help continue the work that gets you the news that matters most.

Search

Send this to a friend