Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
Newsom's Homeless Court Plan Allowing Compulsory Treatment Advances
gvw_ap_news
By Associated Press
Published 3 years ago on
August 31, 2022

Share

 

Gov. Gavin Newsom’s controversial proposal to steer homeless people with severe mental disorders into treatment cleared the state Assembly on Tuesday and is on its way to becoming law despite objections from civil liberties advocates who fear it will be used to force unhoused residents into care they don’t want.

Homeless people with severe mental health disorders often cycle among the streets, jail and hospitals, with no one entity responsible for their well-being. They can be held against their will at a psychiatric hospital for up to 72 hours. But once stabilized, a person who agrees to continue taking medication and follow up on services must be released.

The bill the state Assembly approved on Tuesday by a 60-2 vote would require counties to set up a special civil court to process petitions brought by family, first responders and others on behalf of an individual diagnosed with specified disorders, such as schizophrenia and other psychiatric disorders.

The court could order a plan lasting up to 12 months, and renewable for another 12 months. An individual facing a criminal charge could avoid punishment by completing a mental health treatment plan. A person who does not agree to a treatment plan could be compelled into it. Newsom has said he hopes these courts catch people before they fall into the criminal court system.

The bill represents a new approach for California to address homelessness, a crisis the state has struggled with for decades. The state government spends billions of dollars on the issue each year, only for the public to perceive little progress on the streets.

“I believe that this bill is an opportunity for us to write a new narrative,” said Assemblymember Mike Gipson, a Democrat who voted for the bill.

The bill has now passed both houses of the state Legislature and needs one more vote in the state Senate before it will go to Newsom’s desk. Newsom has until the end of September to sign it into law.

The proposal had broad support from lawmakers who said it was clear California had to do something about the mental health crisis visible along highways and in city streets. Supporters relayed harrowing tales of watching loved ones cycle in and out of temporary psychiatric holds, without a mechanism to stabilize them in a long-term treatment plan.

Republican Assemblymember Suzette Martinez Valladares said her cousin, a Vietnam War veteran, had been living on the streets in a homeless camp before his death.

“I wish that my family had the tools that this bill is going to bring forward so that he might still be alive and with us,” she said. “This is going to save lives. It’s about time.”

Critics of the legislation have maintained that the state lacks enough homes, treatment beds, outreach workers and therapists to care for those who want help, never mind people compelled to take it. They say that people who choose to accept treatment are much more likely to succeed than those coerced into it.

“At what point does compassion end and our desire to just get people off the streets and out of our public sight begins?” said Assemblymember Al Muratsuchi, a Democrat who said he reluctantly supported the bill on Tuesday. “I don’t think this is a great bill. But it seems to be the best idea that we have at this point to try to improve a godawful situation.”

The bill says Glenn, Orange, Riverside, San Diego, San Francisco, Stanislaus, and Tuolumne counties must establish courts by Oct. 1, 2023, with the remainder by Dec. 1, 2024.

Courts could fine counties up to $1,000 a day for non-compliance, which counties believe is unfair if they don’t have enough support from the state in the way of housing and behavioral health workers.

“There will be no perfect solution to this problem. But this is better than doing nothing and it is too easy in a democracy to kick a problem down the road and do nothing,” said Assemblymember Steve Bennett, a Democrat who voted for the bill.

RELATED TOPICS:

DON'T MISS

What Are Fresno Real Estate Experts Predicting for 2025 and Beyond?

UP NEXT

US Marines Carry out First Known Detention of Civilian in Los Angeles, Video Shows

Nippon Steel’s Purchase of US Steel Closes, With Big Role for Trump

17 minutes ago

US to Drop Guidance to Limit Alcohol to One or Two Drinks per Day, Sources Say

1 hour ago

EV Maker VinFast Sets Up First Dealership in California

VinFast said on Wednesday its first dealership in San Diego, California, is set to begin operations this month, as the Vietnamese electric-v...

3 minutes ago

3 minutes ago

EV Maker VinFast Sets Up First Dealership in California

6 minutes ago

US Labor Market Softening; Single-Family Building Permits Slump

Peter DA Vang is Valley Crime Stoppers' Most Wanted Person of the Day for June 18, 2025. (Valley Crimes Stoppers)
11 minutes ago

Valley Crime Stoppers’ Most Wanted Person of the Day: Peter DA Vang

17 minutes ago

Nippon Steel’s Purchase of US Steel Closes, With Big Role for Trump

Cans of Budweiser brand beer are pictured at a liquor store in Washington, D.C. U.S., September 1, 2024. (Reuters File)
1 hour ago

US to Drop Guidance to Limit Alcohol to One or Two Drinks per Day, Sources Say

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth attends a Senate Appropriations Committee hearing on U.S. President Donald Trump's budget request for the Department of Defense, on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., U.S., June 11, 2025. (Reuters File)
1 hour ago

US Military “Prepared to Execute” Any Trump Decisions on War and Peace, Hegseth Says

Traders work on the main trading floor of the New York Stock Exchange shortly after the opening bell of the trading session in New York, January 15, 2016. (Reuters File)
1 hour ago

Wall Street Indexes Edge Higher Ahead of Fed’s Interest Rate Verdict

People gather and react outside the U.S. Supreme Court on the day it heard arguments over an appeal by U.S. President Joe Biden's administration of a lower court's decision upholding a Republican-backed ban in Tennessee on gender-affirming medical care for transgender minors, in Washington, U.S., December 4, 2024. (Reuters File)
1 hour ago

US Supreme Court Upholds Tennessee Law Banning Youth Transgender Care

Help continue the work that gets you the news that matters most.

Search

Send this to a friend