Judge Orders Boswell, Vidovich Back to Their Corners in Ditch Bank Battle - GV Wire - Explore. Explain. Expose
Connect with us


Judge Orders Boswell, Vidovich Back to Their Corners in Ditch Bank Battle



A Boswell excavator stands guard on the Tulare Lake Canal bank earlier this year to prevent a pipeline from being trenched beneath the ditch . (SJV Water/Lois Henry
Share with friends


Heavy equipment preventing a pipeline from cutting through a canal was ordered removed and the project was halted temporarily by a Kings County Superior Court judge on March 4.

Lois Henry

SJV Water

The fight between the Tulare Lake Canal Company, controlled by the J.G. Boswell Company, and Sandridge Partners, controlled by John Vidovich, will be back in court on March 23 when Judge Valerie Chrissakis will decide whether the Sandridge pipeline is subject to review under the California Environmental Quality Act If so, it would mean the pipeline would have to undergo a full-blown EIR with multiple public hearings.

So far, the 48-inch pipeline has been trenched and laid out for more than 10 miles from north of Lemoore to near the community of Stratford on private land with no public notice or oversight. Typically, irrigation pipelines taking water from one portion of a farmer’s land to another don’t require permitting.

The trenching was blocked in late January by heavy equipment bearing the diamond “B” Boswell logo after negotiations between Sandridge and the Tulare Lake Canal Company stalled over an operating agreement. Sandridge has since installed “coffer dams” in the canal to dry a section in anticipation of cutting through the banks, but otherwise construction has stopped.

The project was ordered to remain in stasis until the issue comes back to court.

Potential Participation by Two Public Agencies

Judge Chrissakis found the potential involvement of two public entities, the Stratford Public Utilities District and Angiola Water District, could take the line out of the private realm and require a study of potential environmental impacts.

Sandridge has said in court filings it intends to include a smaller “sleeve” within its larger pipeline to potentially take sewage water from Stratford PUD.

Strafford PUD attorney Ray Carlson said during the hearing that the district had been in very preliminary talks with Sandridge about the future possibility of moving its wastewater through the pipeline.

“It’s a concept, at best,” he said.

To bring it to fruition the district would have to apply to the U.S. Department of Agriculture or the state of California for funding, then build a new treatment facility and construct a line to get its wastewater to the Sandridge line. Every step would require environmental oversight, permitting, and public hearings.

None of that has been discussed yet, Carlson stressed.

But a portion of the Sandridge pipeline has been laid on land owned by Stratford PUD, Chrissakis noted.

Judge Wonders If Letter Is ‘Smoking Gun’

As for Angiola’s involvement, Chrissakis found a Jan. 17 letter to Tulare Lake Canal Company “highly relevant.” In the letter, Angiola says it will use the pipeline and indemnify the canal company for any damage from the pipeline.

Attorneys for Sandridge and Angiola argued the pipeline isn’t an Angiola project as it lies outside the district’s boundaries. Angiola also doesn’t own any water. It is an administrator, delivering supplies at the direction of its landowners, such as Sandridge, said Sandridge attorney Marshall Whitney.

That struck Chrissakis as inconsistent.

“I’m at a loss to understand why Angiola would execute a hold harmless agreement, putting its funds at risk and opening the district to liability, but then says the pipeline isn’t on our property so it’s not our project,” Chrissakis said during Friday’s hearing.

Whitney said the letter wasn’t an actual agreement, but part of a back and forth between Sandridge and Tulare Lake Canal Company that was never accepted nor executed.

But the letter continued to intrigue Chrissakis.

“It shows something about the thought process that we don’t usually get to see,” she said, wondering if the letter is a kind of “smoking gun” that exposes the true intent of the pipeline as a public project that’s “being hidden.”

“It’s an unusual letter and I was surprised to see it,” Chrissakis added.

While the letter was “improvident,” attorney Whitney said, it certainly wasn’t any kind of “peak behind the curtain.” He maintained that it wasn’t an official indemnification by Angiola.

“This is privately owned water being moved on private land,” Whitney said, warning that requiring an irrigation pipeline to undergo CEQA review could impact irrigation projects on a wide scale throughout the San Joaquin Valley.

Either way, Judge Chrissakis ordered the pipeline halted until she decides whether it should come under CEQA review at a March 23 hearing.

She also found that Tulare Lake Canal Company did not have the right under its easement to block the pipeline with heavy equipment and ordered the tractors off the canal banks.

About SJV Water

SJV Water is an independent, nonprofit news site dedicated to covering water in the San Joaquin Valley.

Continue Reading
Advertisement GVwire