Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
Walters: Court Upbraids Jerry Brown on Ballot Measure
dan_walters
By Dan Walters, CalMatters Commentary
Published 4 years ago on
January 5, 2021

Share

A political saga that began more than four decades ago came full circle last week when the state Supreme Court, including four Jerry Brown appointees, indirectly upbraided the former governor.

Unanimously, the court declared that Proposition 57, a major criminal justice overhaul sponsored by Brown and overwhelmingly passed by voters in 2016, did what its critics said it would do, not what Brown told voters.

Dan Walters

Opinion

Brown portrayed the measure, which lightened sentences for some felons, as a common sense reform to give nonviolent felons a better chance at rehabilitation by allowing them to earn earlier releases on parole. He wanted to undo, he said, a torrent of lock-‘em-up sentencing laws that began during his first governorship four decades earlier, when crime rates were peaking and voters were demanding harsher punishment.

However, Proposition 57 did not specify which felonies would be deemed nonviolent, but indirectly relied on a Penal Code list of 23 violent crimes. The list excluded quite a few felonies, such as sex crimes, that most of us would deem to be violent — and, in fact, are counted as violent offenses by the state Department of Justice.

It Could Shorten the Terms of Some Vicious Predators

Critics of Brown’s measure — the state’s prosecutors, particularly — pointed out the anomaly, and complained that if passed, it could shorten the terms of some vicious predators.

Brown responded by promising that by regulation, state prison officials would prohibit sex criminals from being paroled under Proposition 57 and voters apparently believed him.

As promised, regulations promulgated by the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation excluded many sex offenders from Proposition 57’s softer parole provisions. But attorneys for those offenders quickly disputed the rules’ legality and they scored victories in trial and appellate courts.

The lawsuits contended that the agency could not, by regulation, modify the wording of a voter-approved ballot measure and eventually the issue wound up in the state Supreme Court, which set aside the regulations.

“The initiative’s language provides no indication that the voters intended to allow the (Corrections) department to create a wholesale exclusion from parole consideration based on an inmate’s sex offense convictions when the inmate was convicted of a nonviolent felony,” wrote Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye in the unanimous decision.

Cantil-Sakauye subtly but unmistakably criticized Brown for sloppy drafting of the ballot measure.

The State’s Lawyers Attempted to Defend the Disputed Rules by Citing Brown’s Sponsorship

“Had the drafters of Proposition 57, and by extension the voters, intended to exclude inmates from nonviolent offender parole consideration based on prior or current sex offense convictions, it would have been a simple matter to say so explicitly,” she said.

The state’s lawyers attempted to defend the disputed rules by citing Brown’s sponsorship, but that also drew the court’s scorn. “Our analysis of the voters’ intent does not change merely because the proponents of the initiative here included the governor,” Cantil-Sakauye wrote.

The ruling upholds the critics of Proposition 57, who warned in 2016 that it was hastily and sloppily drafted and could allow sex predators to win paroles and once again prowl for victims.

Ironically and perhaps tragically, it was issued just weeks after voters rejected a measure, Proposition 20, that would have corrected the gaps in Proposition 57.

Thus, there is an indelible stain on what Brown had said was one of his proudest achievements.

CalMatters is a public interest journalism venture committed to explaining how California’s state Capitol works and why it matters. For more stories by Dan Walters, go to calmatters.org/commentary.

[activecampaign form=19]

RELATED TOPICS:

DON'T MISS

What Are Fresno Real Estate Experts Predicting for 2025 and Beyond?

UP NEXT

Tulare County Authorities Search for Man Missing in Tule River

SF-Based Salesforce Is Buying Informatica in $8 Billion Deal

2 hours ago

Fresno Unified Safety Officer Alleges Battery by District Exec. What Does PD Say?

3 hours ago

Westlands Leader Calls Slight Water Boost ‘Disappointing’

Westlands Water District leader Allison Febbo characterized Tuesday’s announced 5% federal water allocation increase as “disappo...

1 hour ago

1 hour ago

Westlands Leader Calls Slight Water Boost ‘Disappointing’

U.S. Senator Tommy Tuberville (R-AL) speaks at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) annual meeting in National Harbor, Maryland, U.S., February 22, 2024. REUTERS/Amanda Andrade-Rhoades/File Photo
1 hour ago

Republican Tuberville Announces Bid for Alabama Governor

Residents walk by power grid towers at Bair Island State Marine Park in Redwood City, California, United States, January 26, 2022. REUTERS/Carlos Barria/File Photo
1 hour ago

PG&E Sees Surge in AI Data Center Interest With Fresno Area Emerging as New Hotspot

Salesforce Tower in New York
2 hours ago

SF-Based Salesforce Is Buying Informatica in $8 Billion Deal

3 hours ago

Fresno Unified Safety Officer Alleges Battery by District Exec. What Does PD Say?

Authorities arrested 45 people and seized guns and drugs during a multi-agency parole and probation sweep across Tulare County over the past two weekends. (Tulare County SO)
4 hours ago

Tulare County Authorities Arrest 45 in Parole, Probation Sweep

Students walk on the campus of Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts, U.S., May 23, 2025. REUTERS/Faith Ninivaggi/File Photo
4 hours ago

Trump Administration Halts Scheduling of New Student Visa Appointments

4 hours ago

Trump Pardons Tax Cheat After Mother Attends $1 Million Dinner

Help continue the work that gets you the news that matters most.

Search

Send this to a friend