Share
Courthouse News Service
OAKLAND, Calif. (CN) — A federal judge found California’s ban on “offensive” personalized license plates unconstitutional Tuesday, ruling it constitutes viewpoint discrimination under the First Amendment.
State regulations require the bureaucracy to refuse configurations that are “offensive to good taste and decency,” based on criteria that includes obscene, vulgar, or sexual language, or has “a negative connotation to a specific group.”
Lead plaintiff Paul Ogilvie, a disabled army veteran, sued the DMV in March after it rejected his request for a plate stating “OGWOOLF,” a military nickname that the DMV construed as a reference to a gang affiliation. The DMV also rejected a request for a “SLAAYR” plate, paying homage to the California rock band, because it was deemed “threatening, aggressive, or hostile.” A gay man had his request for a “QUEER” plate rejected as well.
RELATED TOPICS:
Categories
Fresno Approves $2.4 Billion Budget. What’s In, What’s Out?
The S&P 500 Is Nearing a Record. Really.
Only Nonviolence Will Beat Trump
Obama Steps Back Into Public Eye at a Stormy Political Moment
Remains of 796 Babies Feared Buried at Former Irish Catholic Home
Newsom Gave Political Rival a $380K Job. See the Special Interests Who Paid for It
