Share
Courthouse News Service
OAKLAND, Calif. (CN) — A federal judge found California’s ban on “offensive” personalized license plates unconstitutional Tuesday, ruling it constitutes viewpoint discrimination under the First Amendment.
State regulations require the bureaucracy to refuse configurations that are “offensive to good taste and decency,” based on criteria that includes obscene, vulgar, or sexual language, or has “a negative connotation to a specific group.”
Lead plaintiff Paul Ogilvie, a disabled army veteran, sued the DMV in March after it rejected his request for a plate stating “OGWOOLF,” a military nickname that the DMV construed as a reference to a gang affiliation. The DMV also rejected a request for a “SLAAYR” plate, paying homage to the California rock band, because it was deemed “threatening, aggressive, or hostile.” A gay man had his request for a “QUEER” plate rejected as well.
RELATED TOPICS:
Categories
From Blue Cheese to Bacon: Peanut Butter Pairings That Will Shock You
Challengers Seek Seats on Tulare County Irrigation District Boards
Shy Pup Finds Hope with Foster Family, Evasion from Euthanasia
Does Dill Have Magical Powers? What People Once Believed Food Could Do
Let’s Keep Innovative Partnerships Crucial to Combating Climate Change: Fresno Dairy Manager
