Share
SACRAMENTO — A three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Friday threw out California’s ban on high-capacity ammunition magazines, saying the law violates the U.S. Constitution’s protection of the right to bear firearms.
“Even well-intentioned laws must pass constitutional muster,” Appellate Judge Kenneth Lee wrote for the panel’s majority. California’s ban on magazines holding more than 10 bullets “strikes at the core of the Second Amendment — the right to armed self-defense.”
He noted that California passed the law “in the wake of heart-wrenching and highly publicized mass shootings,” but said that isn’t enough to justify a ban whose scope “is so sweeping that half of all magazines in America are now unlawful to own in California.”
California Attorney General Xavier Becerra did not immediately say if he would ask the full appellate court to reconsider the ruling by the three judges, or if he would appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.
He also did not immediately say if the state would seek a delay of the ruling to prevent an immediate buying spree. Sales are currently on hold based on a stay by the lower court and cannot immediately resume.
It Was a Fractured Decision
California Rifle & Pistol Association attorney Chuck Michel called it “a huge victory” for gun owners “and the right to choose to own a firearm to defend your family.”
The ruling has national implications because other states have similar restrictions, though it immediately applies only to Western states under the appeals court’s jurisdiction.
It was a fractured decision: Two of the three judges voted to toss out the state’s ban, while the third judge dissented.
U.S. District Court Judge Barbara Lynn of Texas, who had been named the third judge on the appellate panel, said the majority’s ruling conflicts with decisions in six other district courts across the nation.
Gun rights groups have been trying to get such cases before the nation’s high court now that it has a more conservative majority.
Friday’s decision upholds a 2017 ruling by San Diego-based U.S. District Judge Roger Benitez, who blocked a new law that would have barred gun owners from possessing magazines holding more than 10 bullets.
But he and the appeals court went further by declaring unconstitutional a state law that had prohibited buying or selling such magazines since 2000. That law had let those who had the magazines before then keep them, but barred new sales or imports.
RELATED TOPICS:
S&P 500, Nasdaq Approach Record High as Middle East Tensions Ease
47 minutes ago
Trump Declares Iran ‘Victory for Everybody’ Despite Doubts Over Damage
49 minutes ago
Cuomo Concedes to Mamdani in New York City Democratic Mayoral Contest
12 hours ago
Mamdani Holds Lead Over Cuomo in Democratic Primary for NYC Mayor
13 hours ago
Fresno County’s New Breeding Ordinance Could Shut Down 50 Operations
16 hours ago
NATO Leaders Set to Back Trump Defense Spending Goal at Hague Summit
16 hours ago
Lender’s Intervention Halts City of Fresno’s Eviction Attempt at Granite Park
16 hours ago
Clovis Unified Faces Lawsuit Alleging Years of Neglect and Sexual Abuse at Fancher Creek
17 hours ago
US New Home Sales Fall More Than Expected in May, Inventory Rises
1 minute ago
Categories

US New Home Sales Fall More Than Expected in May, Inventory Rises

Seven Israeli Soldiers Killed in Gaza, Pressure on Netanyahu for Ceasefire

Zelenskiy Hails ‘Substantive’ Meeting With Trump

S&P 500, Nasdaq Approach Record High as Middle East Tensions Ease

Trump Declares Iran ‘Victory for Everybody’ Despite Doubts Over Damage

Cuomo Concedes to Mamdani in New York City Democratic Mayoral Contest

Mamdani Holds Lead Over Cuomo in Democratic Primary for NYC Mayor

Fresno County’s New Breeding Ordinance Could Shut Down 50 Operations
