Predicting the Next Pandemic
Share
[aggregation-styles]
Foreign Affairs Subscription
Political systems matter a great deal when it comes to disaster response. In general, democracies are better than autocracies at managing early warning systems: it is harder to suppress reports of an impending crisis in an open and transparent political system than in a closed system that incentivizes withholding unpleasant truths. In China, the central government sanctions local officials who fail to keep infectious disease rates below a prescribed level, thus encouraging them to underreport cases.
That is what happened last December, when officials in Wuhan—the city where the novel coronavirus originated—kept quiet and punished the doctors who first reported the outbreak. No bureaucrat likes delivering bad news to superiors, but officials in democracies are more likely to do so because they know that if they don’t, the legislative branch, civil society, think tanks, and media could publicize their failure to report.
It was this general logic that led the Nobel Prize–winning economist Amartya Sen to argue that no famine had ever taken place in a democracy. This claim has invited skepticism and critique, but Sen’s point that data collection and communications tend to be better in democracies was spot-on.
Read More →
Foreign Affairs Subscription
Political systems matter a great deal when it comes to disaster response. In general, democracies are better than autocracies at managing early warning systems: it is harder to suppress reports of an impending crisis in an open and transparent political system than in a closed system that incentivizes withholding unpleasant truths. In China, the central government sanctions local officials who fail to keep infectious disease rates below a prescribed level, thus encouraging them to underreport cases.
That is what happened last December, when officials in Wuhan—the city where the novel coronavirus originated—kept quiet and punished the doctors who first reported the outbreak. No bureaucrat likes delivering bad news to superiors, but officials in democracies are more likely to do so because they know that if they don’t, the legislative branch, civil society, think tanks, and media could publicize their failure to report.
It was this general logic that led the Nobel Prize–winning economist Amartya Sen to argue that no famine had ever taken place in a democracy. This claim has invited skepticism and critique, but Sen’s point that data collection and communications tend to be better in democracies was spot-on.
Read More →
By Andrew S. Natsios | 14 July 2020
RELATED TOPICS:
Former Bulldog QB Jake Haener: I Have a ‘Rare Form of Skin Cancer’
Sports /
4 hours ago
The Many Names of GOP Vice Presidential Nominee JD Vance
Latest /
4 hours ago
Companies Cut Prices to Boost Sales, Consumers Respond
Business /
5 hours ago
Warner Bros. Discovery Sues NBA for Not Accepting Its Matching Offer
Sports /
6 hours ago
Will Bonta Election Lawsuit Reverse the Will of Fresno County Voters?
Politics /
6 hours ago
Latest
Videos
Crime /
3 hours ago
Fresno Man Sentenced to 29 Years for Sexually Assaulting Children and Dog
Sports /
3 hours ago
Bulldogs’ Two-Position Standout Tommy Hopfe Signs With Rockies
Sports /
4 hours ago
Former Bulldog QB Jake Haener: I Have a ‘Rare Form of Skin Cancer’
Latest /
4 hours ago