Predicting the Next Pandemic
By News
Published 4 years ago on
July 27, 2020
Share
[aggregation-styles]
Foreign Affairs Subscription
Political systems matter a great deal when it comes to disaster response. In general, democracies are better than autocracies at managing early warning systems: it is harder to suppress reports of an impending crisis in an open and transparent political system than in a closed system that incentivizes withholding unpleasant truths. In China, the central government sanctions local officials who fail to keep infectious disease rates below a prescribed level, thus encouraging them to underreport cases.
That is what happened last December, when officials in Wuhan—the city where the novel coronavirus originated—kept quiet and punished the doctors who first reported the outbreak. No bureaucrat likes delivering bad news to superiors, but officials in democracies are more likely to do so because they know that if they don’t, the legislative branch, civil society, think tanks, and media could publicize their failure to report.
It was this general logic that led the Nobel Prize–winning economist Amartya Sen to argue that no famine had ever taken place in a democracy. This claim has invited skepticism and critique, but Sen’s point that data collection and communications tend to be better in democracies was spot-on.
Read More →
Foreign Affairs Subscription
Political systems matter a great deal when it comes to disaster response. In general, democracies are better than autocracies at managing early warning systems: it is harder to suppress reports of an impending crisis in an open and transparent political system than in a closed system that incentivizes withholding unpleasant truths. In China, the central government sanctions local officials who fail to keep infectious disease rates below a prescribed level, thus encouraging them to underreport cases.
That is what happened last December, when officials in Wuhan—the city where the novel coronavirus originated—kept quiet and punished the doctors who first reported the outbreak. No bureaucrat likes delivering bad news to superiors, but officials in democracies are more likely to do so because they know that if they don’t, the legislative branch, civil society, think tanks, and media could publicize their failure to report.
It was this general logic that led the Nobel Prize–winning economist Amartya Sen to argue that no famine had ever taken place in a democracy. This claim has invited skepticism and critique, but Sen’s point that data collection and communications tend to be better in democracies was spot-on.
Read More →
By Andrew S. Natsios | 14 July 2020
RELATED TOPICS:
Did Arias ‘Weaponize’ City Attorney’s Office by Requesting Documents from Smittcamp?
Politics /
15 hours ago
Google Parent Reports Another Quarter of Robust Growth, Rolls Out First-Ever Quarterly Dividend
Economy /
15 hours ago
US Growth Slows Sharply Amid High Interest Rates and Inflation
Economy /
17 hours ago
Lawyer Says Iran Rapper Famous for Songs After 2022 Killing of Mahsa Amini Sentenced to Death
World /
18 hours ago
Key Questions About CA Budget Deficit Unanswered as Deadlines Loom
The must-follow website this month among California’s politicians, bureaucrats, and interest group lobbyists is the “California Personal Inc...
Opinion /
42 mins ago
Categories
Latest
Videos
Opinion /
42 mins ago
Key Questions About CA Budget Deficit Unanswered as Deadlines Loom
Animals /
1 hour ago
Is This Your Next BFF? Meet Girlfriend, a Professionally Trained Adventure Dog!
Politics /
14 hours ago
Tennessee Lawmakers Pass Bill Criminalizing Adults Assisting Minors in Gender-Affirming Care
Politics /
15 hours ago
Did Arias ‘Weaponize’ City Attorney’s Office by Requesting Documents from Smittcamp?
Economy /
15 hours ago