From Atwood to Chomsky, Intellectuals Come Out Against Cancel Culture
Share
[aggregation-styles]
Haaretz
Margaret Atwood, Noam Chomsky, Garry Kasparov, J.K. Rowling, Salman Rushdie and Wynton Marsalis are just a handful of over 150 intellectuals and cultural figures who signed an open “Letter on Justice and Debate,” published Tuesday on the Harper’s Magazine website.
Perhaps under normal times, such a letter wouldn’t be noteworthy. Then again, in normal times, few would likely see the need for such a letter, which bemoans the fact that the current wave of social protest in the United States is being accompanied by “an intolerance of opposing views, a vogue for public shaming and ostracism, and the tendency to dissolve complex policy issues in a blinding moral certainty.”
The letter concludes: “As writers we need a culture that leaves us room for experimentation, risk taking, and even mistakes. We need to preserve the possibility of good-faith disagreement without dire professional consequences. If we won’t defend the very thing on which our work depends, we shouldn’t expect the public or the state to defend it for us.”
Read More →
Haaretz
Margaret Atwood, Noam Chomsky, Garry Kasparov, J.K. Rowling, Salman Rushdie and Wynton Marsalis are just a handful of over 150 intellectuals and cultural figures who signed an open “Letter on Justice and Debate,” published Tuesday on the Harper’s Magazine website.
Perhaps under normal times, such a letter wouldn’t be noteworthy. Then again, in normal times, few would likely see the need for such a letter, which bemoans the fact that the current wave of social protest in the United States is being accompanied by “an intolerance of opposing views, a vogue for public shaming and ostracism, and the tendency to dissolve complex policy issues in a blinding moral certainty.”
The letter concludes: “As writers we need a culture that leaves us room for experimentation, risk taking, and even mistakes. We need to preserve the possibility of good-faith disagreement without dire professional consequences. If we won’t defend the very thing on which our work depends, we shouldn’t expect the public or the state to defend it for us.”
Read More →
By David B. Green | 8 July 2020
RELATED TOPICS:
New California Environmental Rollbacks Could Boost Housing Projects in Fresno
Housing /
12 hours ago
Iran Made Preparations to Mine the Strait of Hormuz, US Sources Say
World /
13 hours ago
Trump Floats Daughter-in-Law Lara Trump for Senate Run in North Carolina
Politics /
13 hours ago
Google Hit With $314 Million US Verdict in Cellular Data Class Action
Courts /
14 hours ago
Trump Says US Could Reach Trade Deal With India, Casts Doubt on Deal With Japan
World /
14 hours ago
Jury Reaches Verdict on Some Counts at Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs’ Sex Trafficking Trial
Courts /
14 hours ago
How Wimbledon Is Tackling Its Hottest Opening on Record
Sports /
15 hours ago
Latest
Videos

World /
12 hours ago
Trump Says Israel Has Agreed to Conditions to Finalize 60-Day Gaza Ceasefire

Housing /
12 hours ago
New California Environmental Rollbacks Could Boost Housing Projects in Fresno

World /
13 hours ago
Iran Made Preparations to Mine the Strait of Hormuz, US Sources Say

Politics /
13 hours ago
Trump Floats Daughter-in-Law Lara Trump for Senate Run in North Carolina

Courts /
14 hours ago
Google Hit With $314 Million US Verdict in Cellular Data Class Action

Video /
15 hours ago