Trump’s Middle East Plan: Starting Point or Dead End?
Share
[aggregation-styles]
The New York Times Subscription
Of the many proposals for an Israeli-Palestinian peace rolled out over the decades, circumstances made the one President Trump announced on Tuesday the hardest to take seriously.
While Mr. Trump outlined what he described as his “vision” for a Mideast peace in the gilded East Room of the White House to waves of applause from a selected audience, his impeachment trial was droning on in the Capitol. And as Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel, standing by his side, proclaimed Mr. Trump “the greatest friend Israel has ever had in the White House,” Israel was reverberating from Mr. Netanyahu’s surprising decision to drop his request for immunity and to face trial on three corruption charges.
From all appearances, the “deal of the century,” as it was touted, seemed nothing more than a cynical attempt at a diversion by two politicians in trouble, a sop to their right-wing bases as each leader vies for re-election — Mr. Netanyahu in early March, Mr. Trump in November. A chorus of analysts declared the deal dead on arrival and worse, an American abdication of any mediating role in the future.
Read More →
The New York Times Subscription
Of the many proposals for an Israeli-Palestinian peace rolled out over the decades, circumstances made the one President Trump announced on Tuesday the hardest to take seriously.
While Mr. Trump outlined what he described as his “vision” for a Mideast peace in the gilded East Room of the White House to waves of applause from a selected audience, his impeachment trial was droning on in the Capitol. And as Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel, standing by his side, proclaimed Mr. Trump “the greatest friend Israel has ever had in the White House,” Israel was reverberating from Mr. Netanyahu’s surprising decision to drop his request for immunity and to face trial on three corruption charges.
From all appearances, the “deal of the century,” as it was touted, seemed nothing more than a cynical attempt at a diversion by two politicians in trouble, a sop to their right-wing bases as each leader vies for re-election — Mr. Netanyahu in early March, Mr. Trump in November. A chorus of analysts declared the deal dead on arrival and worse, an American abdication of any mediating role in the future.
Read More →
By The New York Times Editorial Board | 30 Jan 2020
RELATED TOPICS:
Soviet-Era Spacecraft Plunges to Earth After 53 Years Stuck in Orbit
Science /
5 hours ago
Tax the Rich? Slash Spending? Republicans Wrestle With Economic Priorities in the Trump Era
Politics /
5 hours ago
Experts Call Kennedy’s Plan to find Autism’s Cause Unrealistic
Politics /
5 hours ago
Trump’s Trip to Saudi Arabia Raises the Prospect of US Nuclear Cooperation With the Kingdom
World /
5 hours ago
Oh Ohtani! Dodgers Star Hits 3-Run Homer in Late Rally Victory Over Diamondbacks
Sports /
5 hours ago
Tariff Talks Begin Between US and Chinese Officials in Geneva
Economy /
5 hours ago
Summer Movie Guide 2025: Here’s What’s Coming to Theaters and Streaming From May to August
Latest /
6 hours ago
Latest
Videos

Local /
4 hours ago
Two Teens Charged in Shooting Death of Caleb Quick

Science /
5 hours ago
Soviet-Era Spacecraft Plunges to Earth After 53 Years Stuck in Orbit

Politics /
5 hours ago
Tax the Rich? Slash Spending? Republicans Wrestle With Economic Priorities in the Trump Era

World /
3 days ago