Share
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
SACRAMENTO — California cannot ban gun owners from having detachable magazines that hold more than 10 rounds, a federal judge ruled Friday.
The decision from U.S. District Judge Roger Benitez won’t take effect immediately. Democratic U.S. Attorney General Rob Bonta has already promised to appeal the ruling. The ban is likely to remain in effect while the case is still pending.
Previous Rulings
This is the second time Benitez has struck down California’s law banning high-capacity magazines. The first time he struck it down — way back in 2017 — an appeals court ended up reversing his decision.
But last year, the U.S. Supreme Court set a new standard for how to interpret the nation’s gun laws. The new standard relies more on the historical tradition of gun regulation rather than public interests, including safety.
Supreme Court Intervention
The Supreme Court ordered the case to be heard again in light of the new standards. It’s one of three high-profile challenges to California gun laws that are getting new hearings in court. The other two cases challenge California laws banning assault-style weapons and limiting purchases of ammunition.
Benitez ruled “there is no American tradition of limiting ammunition capacity.” He said detachable magazines “solved a problem with historic firearms: running out of ammunition and having to slowly reload a gun.”
“There have been, and there will be, times where many more than 10 rounds are needed to stop attackers,” Benitez wrote. “Yet, under this statute, the State says ‘too bad.’”
Reactions to the Ruling
Bonta, California’s attorney general, said large-capacity magazines are also important to mass shooters, allowing them to fire quickly into crowds of people without reloading. He said the U.S. Supreme Court made it clear the new standard for reviewing gun laws “did not create a regulatory straitjacket for states.”
“We believe that the district court got this wrong,” Bonta said. “We will move quickly to correct this incredibly dangerous mistake.”
Chuck Michel, president of the California Rifle and Pistol Association, praised Benitez for a “thoughtful and in-depth approach.”
“Sure, the state will appeal, but the clock is ticking on laws that violate the Constitution,” Michel said.
RELATED TOPICS:
Trump Poised to Offer Saudi Arabia Over $100 Billion Arms Package, Sources Say
7 hours ago
Lights, Camera, Board Vote: Fresno Unified’s Carefully Choreographed Production
7 hours ago
On Major Economic Decisions, Trump Blinks, and Then Blinks Again
8 hours ago
Tulare Man Sentenced to State Prison for DUI Crash That Injured Two Women
10 hours ago
Two From Search Group That Uncovered Mexico’s ‘Ranch of Horror’ Killed
10 hours ago

Fresno City Council Finally Passes a Tough Smoke Shop Ordinance

Trump Poised to Offer Saudi Arabia Over $100 Billion Arms Package, Sources Say

Lights, Camera, Board Vote: Fresno Unified’s Carefully Choreographed Production

On Major Economic Decisions, Trump Blinks, and Then Blinks Again

Wired Wednesday: What’s the Future of Fresno Unified and the Superintendent Position?

Zakaria Draws Parallels Between Trump’s Tariffs, Failed 1930s Economic Policies
