SHARE THIS ARTICLE:

Six Flags Discovery Kingdom in Vallejo describes itself as the “Thrill Capital of Northern California featuring a unique combination of animal attractions, thrilling rides, exciting shows and wildlife presentations.”

But a report in the Marin Independent Journal newspaper this week explored speculation from various unnamed sources that the “Thrill Capital” might soon relocate to the Central Valley — specifically Fresno.

Vallejo Mayor Robert McConnell confirmed to the paper that he had seen a “report” of the rumored move two weeks ago. He said park management had also heard the rumor from from a “trusted source.”

McConnell said he was told that the report ‘had no validity to it,” the newspaper noted. “At this point we understand that there is no move. There is no move planned,” the mayor told the paper.

Six Flags spokesman Marc-Angelo Merino responded to the Journal inquiry, saying the park’s policy is “that we don’t comment on rumors.”

Response from Fresno Mayor Jerry Dyer

GV Wire℠ wanted to find out what local officials thought about the possibility of a major theme park coming to the Fresno area.

A request for comment to the Fresno County Economic Development Corporation — responsible for recruiting new businesses and assisting with relocations — was quickly and directly referred to the office of Fresno Mayor Jerry Dyer.

The mayor’s office provided a rapid response, as well, via email.

“The City of Fresno continues to explore ways to boost our economy and serve as the entertainment hub for Central California,” the email said, in a comment attributed to Dyer . “Should Six Flags be interested in relocating to our city, we will roll out the red carpet for them and treat them like royalty.”

“Should Six Flags be interested in relocating to our city, we will roll out the red carpet for them and treat them like royalty.”Fresno Mayor Jerry Dyer

Six Flags is the No. 2 employer in Vallejo during non-pandemic summer seasons, “and a welcome member of this community,” said Michael Browne, CEO of Vallejo’s tourism agency, in response to the newspaper’s inquiries.

“It (the theme park) delivers significant tourism and economic development in the form of the Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) to the City’s general fund and the Vallejo Tourism Business Improvement District (VTBID) assessment by the lodging community,” Browne told the paper.

“It is our understanding that they are happy here in Vallejo and look forward to making Vallejo their home for many years to come,” Browne is quoted as saying.

However, based on the company’s history, a relocation to a new home would not be unprecedented. The theme park has moved before.

“The originally-called Marine World Africa U.S.A. and its 500 animals outgrew its 62-acre home in Redwood City in 1985 after 17 years, choosing Vallejo over Mountain View and Oakland,” the Journal reports. The new Vallejo park opened in 1986.

Disney Once Considered Sequoia National Park

It’s not so far fetched to think a major amusement park wouldn’t at least consider all that Central California has to offer.

Walt Disney once explored building a massive ski resort in Sequoia National Park.

According to PBS station KCET, in February 1965, the Forest Service issued a prospectus inviting proposals for a ski resort in the valley, then part of Sequoia National Forest. Six proposals answered the call, and in December 1965 the Forest Service announced the winner: a bold plan from the company that created Mickey Mouse and Disneyland.

The proposal by Walt Disney Productions (today, the Walt Disney Company) envisioned an “American Alpine Wonderland” on the floor of Mineral King Valley: a five-story hotel with 1,030 rooms, a movie theater, general store, pools, ice rinks, tennis courts, and a golf course. Twenty-two lifts and gondolas would scale the eight glacial cirques above the village, leading to ski runs four miles long with drops of 3,700 feet.

But, when the Forest Service and Disney announced their plans for the valley in 1965, activists leaped into action, led by the Sierra Club. After battling a lawsuit for about a decade, Disney’s leadership had lost interest in Mineral King.

Congress finally killed the project with the National Parks and Recreation Act of 1978. With President Carter’s signature on Nov. 10, 1978, the Mineral King area became part of Sequoia National Park.

Today, Mineral King Valley is a remote hideaway within California’s Sequoia National Park, accessible only by foot-trail or a winding, treacherous automobile road.

11 Responses

  1. Mindy

    Don’t forget to mention; in regards to Six Flaggs Discovery Kingdom; that we have an Amtrak Station here in Fresno.

    Reply
  2. Valerie Lord

    I wish they would come to Vegas instead. It’s disappointing that we don’t have a single successful large theme park. Especially considering we are the entertainment capital of the world. Js

    Reply
  3. Cynthia L Quintana

    I was a teacher in Vallejo when Six Flags came to town. It was fun to hear the seals squawking early in the morning. Six Flags was a great partner in allowing me to work with their HR department to hire my SPED students in jobs that would allow them to be successful. This is a great opportunity for Fresno.

    Reply
  4. Ron Sherrin

    Is this the same Jerry Dyer that has nothing good to say about the High Speed Rail project? I don’t recall the red carpet being rolled out for the High Speed Rail, in fact angry Jim Patterson never wastes an opportunity to criticize the infrastructure project. This project will bring more esteem to Fresno then an amusement park, and if this town cared about recreation than the City Council would have found the $500,000 needed to repair the Airways Pool. Now it just rots from Republican rule, and neglect. Sad.

    Reply
    • Ryan

      From republican rule? The nowhere train is a waste of money. Will you seriously drive up to merced to then go to Bakersfield? The slow train still has no train or what tracks it will use. You sir sound like a liberal who just wants to spend money. Now that is sad

      Reply
  5. BC

    It wouldn’t make sense. They’re in a large metro area with 8 million people and where tourists visit. Besides just the size of the space, one reason why Marine World relocated was that the land value was too high. I don’t see the incentive to move. Especially not to Fresno. It’s not quite a destination on its own like Disney or Universal theme parks. They get some coaster enthusiasts, but mostly it’s a locals’ park.

    Reply
  6. Noreen

    It would be cool I worked at the original Marine World back in the 70s in Redwood city.I guess I’m to old for a job there but my greatgrandkids would love go I’m sure.

    Reply
  7. DM

    I wish we would decrease the smog….not sure bringing more cars and people here would do the trick.

    Reply
  8. LR

    The sad part is not liberal or republican, but in fact the constant failure to lift Fresno, that has a population more than the capital and rivals many cities in the country. However because of people that think like you, Fresno will forever stay poor, undesirable, overlooked and seen as just a farm town. People that think like you, lack vision, motivation, and the courage to move into the 21st century and beyond. The complacency of damaged roads, and an airport that lacks customers, a tech hub, a horrible and unattractive downtown, seems to be more satisfying than the grand vision to be and do better. That is what is sad.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

We've got issues, and we're willing to share
(but only if you want them in your inbox).