SHARE THIS ARTICLE:

Some lawmakers and mayors expressed skepticism Thursday over Gov. Gavin Newsom’s proposal to give $750 million to regional administrators, selected by the state, rather than to local governments to address homelessness, signaling a potential budget fight.

The comments were made at a budget subcommittee hearing that came on the heels of a critical review of the plan by the nonpartisan Legislative Analyst’s Office. An LAO report said the proposal does not articulate “a clear strategy for curbing homelessness.”

Assembly budget chairman Phil Ting, a Democrat from San Francisco, said he needed many more specifics from the governor before green-lighting a “$750 million check without a lot of balances.”

California Homelessness Up 16%

While homelessness has decreased in other states, the homeless population in California grew 16% to more than 150,000 people in January 2019. State government has taken a more active role in trying to combat growing homelessness in the nation’s most populous state, sending $1.2 million in one-time funding to cities and counties over the last two budget years.

Saying that he’s “treating homelessness like the emergency it is,” Newsom is deploying travel trailers throughout the state to provide temporary shelter, including a first wave of 10 to Los Angeles County on Thursday.

The $750 million proposed by Newsom could go toward rent vouchers, legal support and mediation services, but it would be handled by organizations selected through the state’s Department of Social Services and not by cities, counties or other established local groups that have traditionally delivered the bulk of services to the homeless.

State Administrator Unable to Provide Plan Specifics

Jennifer Troia, a chief deputy director at the California Department of Social Services, said the crisis demands regional, coordinated responses but did not have specifics on how the regions would be divided or which entities might serve as administrators.

“I appreciate your desire for more specificity,” she said. “I hear you.”

Ting responded: “OK. It sounds like we’re going to have more hearings.”

Assemblymembers David Chiu and Richard Bloom, both Democrats, also expressed reservations over the lack of specifics and the method of delivering funding.

The report by the Legislative Analyst’s Office dinged the proposal for using one-time money, which means it won’t be available next year, and for going around cities and counties.

Newsom’s office objected to the legislative analysis and on Thursday, press secretary Jesse Melgar said the “comprehensive” proposal would link resources and “calls for greater coordination between all levels of government.”

“Simply repeating the same responses of the past will only produce the same results — and that’s unacceptable,” he said. “We look to forward working with the Legislature to advance this new strategy and achieve much greater progress on this critical issue.”

Mayors Want Flexibility on Spending

The mayors of Oakland and San Jose also testified at Thursday’s hearing, saying they absolutely need help from the state but want flexibility to use the money as they deem fit as they know the needs and are the ones held accountable by voters.

Other experts on homelessness speaking at the hearing said they are housing people but can’t keep up with demand as more people lose homes due to the state’s outrageously high housing costs.

Ting said afterward that the amount of money is not the issue, although he noted that they have not yet spent the $650 million appropriated in last year’s budget.

“The lack of clarify and specifics around where the money’s going, how it’s being spent, what it’s being spent on, but also what specifically is the issue that we need to create a whole new bureaucratic approach to do this?” Ting said.

“The public will want to know.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

We've got issues, and we're willing to share
(but only if you want them in your inbox).